Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Housing Bubble Correction

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Housing Bubble Correction

    This piece was originally posted to the AlwaysOn Network, January 20, 2005. It was re-published on iTulip.com March 2006. We are re-publishing it on the forums Sept. 5 in order for members to comment on it.

    Fifteen Years to Revert to the Mean


    January 20, 2005
    "If there is a real shift downward in housing demand, it would have a dramatic impact across the entire economy," said John Benjamin, a professor of finance and real estate at American University.

    Millions of Americans have become dependent upon rising home values to support home-equity loans and mortgage refinancings, which can be used to pay for cars, remodeling projects, clothes and more.

    "We live in a consumption economy that is financed by debt," which in turn largely rests upon our home foundations, Benjamin said.

    The labor market, too, depends upon feeding the hunger for housing.

    Since the beginning of the economic recovery in November 2001, employment in housing and housing-related industries has accounted for 43% of the increase in private-sector payrolls, according to Asha Bangalore, an economist for Northern Trust Corp.

    - Experts ask: Is there a housing bubble?

    Housing bubbles don't collapse suddenly. They go through a long series of self-reinforcing deflationary stages that typically last five to seven years. Given the extreme and unprecedented nature of the current housing bubble, I expect a ten- to fifteen-year downturn to follow this boom. The government will step in with all manner of supports and bailouts along the way, similar to those that created the bubble in the first place, so the exact trajectory of the decline is impossible to predict. Here I estimate how and over what time period the decline may occur.



    Chart 1: Correlation of Housing Prices to Employment

    Chart 1 above shows that housing prices are strongly correlated to the unemployment rate. Housing prices fall as unemployment rises, and vice versa. Given that 43% of all jobs created since 2001 are housing (bubble)-related, a decline in housing-related payrolls can be expected to reinforce housing price declines in the bust part of the cycle. The rate of home equity extraction is a good proxy for the housing market itself. Home equity extraction tends to rise in line with property values and declines on the way down; no home owner wants to borrow against a deflating asset, and no bank wants to secure a loan against one either.



    Chart 2: Home Equity Extraction - Past and Predicted

    We'll use home equity extraction as our yardstick to project the bust. Thanks to my friend Paul Kasriel at Northern Trust for the original of Chart 2, which shows home equity extraction from 1950 until 2005. I have modified it to show a possible trajectory of home equity extraction decline in seven steps, A through G, from now until 2020. While I'm fairly confident in the length of the entire process, the length and timing of each step is subject to a wide range of error.

    Step A: You are here. Whether the rate of home equity extraction implodes from here (as shown) or decreases more gradually is a matter of debate, although in past boom-bust cycles, the bust rate of decline has been significantly more rapid than the boom rate of growth. What is not debatable is whether the rate of home equity extraction will revert to the mean rate of about zero, from the current rate of more than $250 billion annually. It will.

    In fact, the rate of home equity extraction will tend to overshoot the mean to reach an extreme negative rate of equity extraction (building equity) that's twice the rate of positive extraction that occurred during the boom phase. This relationship occurred in the previous two cycles, which bottomed in 1982 and 1995, respectively. This implies negative equity extraction of minus $500 billion per year at the cycle trough. Chart 2 shows a more optimistic prediction of negative $250 billion occurring between 2015 and 2020. This more prosaic estimate accounts for government efforts to mitigate the impact and minimize the overshoot, by offering specialized loans, making direct purchases of securitized mortgage debt, and so on.

    Step B: As housing prices begin to decline, sales will continue, though more slowly and less frequently. Old habits die slowly. One year into the decline, housing speculators will have left the market, but home owners will generally still believe that prices will either resume their rise or at least flatten out, not continue to decline. Remember the first year of the stock market bubble decline, when most people hung in there until they'd lost all of their money? The first lesson of behavioral finance is that the most common mistake made by market participants is to hang on too long and fail to cut losses.

    While home owners at this stage will borrow less against their houses, and loans will be more difficult to come by, the average home owner will still make frequent trips to Home Depot or hire contractors to make home repairs and improvements, believing they'll "get their money back" in an increase in the value of their home at least equal to the cost of fixing it. Some home owners will put their home up for sale—if they purchased early enough in the boom so that they can still realize a profit, even selling at five to twenty percent below the peak price.

    Step C: After prices have declined for two years, large numbers of buyers who purchased near the top of the market will begin to feel the psychological effects of being underwater on their mortgage. They will be less inclined to borrow money, or to spend money fixing up their home, as home improvement value increases will be swallowed up by general market price declines. There will still be profits to be made by those who bought very early in the previous boom cycle, but fewer people will have this option.

    As transaction volumes continue to fall, demand for housing-related employment will decline too. The first signs of labor market distress will start to show up, as more and more of that 43% of the private sector who found jobs in the housing industry are no longer needed. Coincidentally, major employers—such as the U.S. auto industry—will be going through major restructuring, adding to pressures on housing prices in some areas. Some home owners will need to sell at a loss in order to move to regions of the country where the labor picture is better, and will do this if they have enough equity and are not paying cash out of pocket to cover their remaining mortgage obligations. These sales will further depress home prices.

    Step D: Three years into the decline, marginal home buyers will learn what owning a home really costs, versus renting when housing prices are declining and jobs are more scarce. Rent is a fixed cost, whereas home ownership presents many variable costs, including increased interest payments on ARMs, and rising tax, insurance, and energy costs. Also, upkeep for the average home typically costs five to ten percent of the price of the home, annually. As prices fall, homeowners will have less access to home equity loans. Many will not be able to afford repair and maintenance expenses. Homes in some neighborhoods—and in some cases, entire neighborhoods—will begin to look neglected, further depressing prices.

    Step E: Five years into the downturn, rising unemployment will begin to more seriously affect the market, as indicated in Chart 1. As unemployment rises, homeowners will leave housing bust regions to move to areas where there are more jobs. Many houses will be sold at a loss, or even abandoned, as the market price falls below the loan value. Given the choice between paying cash out of pocket to sell their home or leaving the keys with the bank, many home owners will make the latter choice.

    Step F: Ten years into the downturn, real estate will be widely regarded as a terrible, "can't win" investment. McMansions will be subdivided for rental as multi-family homes.

    Step G: Ten to fifteen years after the start of the decline in housing values, prices will bottom out, setting the stage for the next boom. Time to buy.

    Ed.

  • #2
    Re: Housing Bubble Correction

    Received this today...
    About two and half years ago I referenced this article on a thread dealing with how severe and how protracted a down cycle in residential real estate could be.

    Since I can't find my original post, I've taken the liberty of finding the article online. Here is the scenario, first offered back in January of 2005.
    Ed.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Housing Bubble Correction

      Originally posted by Fred View Post
      This piece was originally posted to the AlwaysOn Network, January 20, 2005. It was re-published on iTulip.com March 2006. We are re-publishing it on the forums Sept. 5 in order for members to comment on it.
      I'll focus on how things are locally here in Portland, Oregon. A combination of steps B and C.

      As of June and July (the latest numbers I have), overall metro prices are still going up, or at least have gone flat. August may be the first sign of a downturn for us. The YOY% has been going down since spring of 2006. I expect it to hit zero by the end of this year (using the median and average numbers published by the local MLS), or possibly even September (using the Case/Shiller index).

      A couple charts I maintain to illustrate this:




      Summer of 2006, lines at the local Home Depot were unbearably long. On one occasion I waited half an hour to check out with some lumber. By spring of 2007, the crowds had subsided for the most part. This summer, it's been quiet most times I've been there. The home improvement frenzy has definitely ground to a near-halt.

      Inventory has steadily gone up, sales have slowed down, but asking prices have remained pretty stable thus far. See Housingtracker.net for a chart of this. However, lots of "Priced Reduced" stickers, even in nice neighborhoods.

      Unfortunately, zoog is trying to sell his house in the midst of this slowdown, and he is not having a happy time of it.:eek: As far as my personal experience, my house has been on the market for about five weeks. We've had a few looks but no offers, and have taken $10,000 off our original asking price. I keep wondering how much the typical buyer in Portland is aware of what will happen to home prices, vs. what I know after I started reading the bubble blogs and iTulip. Because if they even get an inkling of the magnitude and length of decline that I expect, it will be panic at the disco.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Housing Bubble Correction

        Zoog,

        It is your money, and your house.

        If you do subscribe to the iTulip message though - I would think you would be far more aggressive in chopping prices to lock in gains.

        Selling a house now is absolutely a case of 'Prisoner's Dilemma'

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Housing Bubble Correction

          Originally posted by c1ue View Post
          Zoog,

          It is your money, and your house.

          If you do subscribe to the iTulip message though - I would think you would be far more aggressive in chopping prices to lock in gains.

          Selling a house now is absolutely a case of 'Prisoner's Dilemma'
          True. Also, "timing is everything". When I read EJ's housing bust predictions, as well as Robert Shiller's, it made sense to me. But I saw that Portland and Seattle were still going strong while California, Florida, Vegas, etc were starting to capitulate. I expected the local market to hold out longer. Actually, it has... but what I didn't count on was the sudden change in the mortgage market. In the matter of a couple weeks it went from subprime "containment" to the entire credit/debt system. I believe the word is... panic?

          This is the essence of the housing crash as I see it. Sellers hold onto their prices because, by all indications, their prices seem "reasonable" compared to everyone else. But because the availability of mortgages has dropped significantly, so many potential buyers have been taken out of the market, and even those who are left cannot get as large of a mortgage any more. Prices will have to come down to a level where someone can get lending.

          The struggle for someone like me is trying to figure out where that price-point is.

          Being a charting kind of guy, I have laid out my predictions for the falling value of my home, along with what I still owe on the mortgage as I pay that down, plus agent fees, etc. The goal of course is to drop my price ahead of the value curve drop, while staying above what I must pay to clear the house. But how to put a value on peace of mind, getting out of the thing whether I make any profit or not.

          Anyway, I don't want to keep rambling on about me me me, it is definitely not my style. I have found though that personal experiences in the markets are enlightening, like The Outback Oracle talking about his importing business seeing rising prices from China. Some front-lines reports from time to time are good to read.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Housing Bubble Correction

            Zoog,

            Understandable that it is not always easy to see that a personal investment field can be impacted - especially given some signs of exception.

            While I am not a real estate professional, I have seen a lot of deals go through via my mother.

            What you're going to have to do is find the right buyer.

            The price itself is no longer really the issue, the issue is whether you can find a buyer that wants your house for something other than a $/square foot.

            This could be due to location, architecture, school system, mortgage note carry, whatever.

            Look at all possible differentiation points, highlight those which could yield desire in a buyer, prioritize, then start shaking down the area and agents to find the buyer.

            For example: if affordability is the most attractive, then having an assumable mortgage and/or willingness to carry a note is very powerful.

            If school system, then there are ways to find out of district students; students desiring entry are more difficult but still possible.

            If location, then appropriate signage plus stress on secondary differentiation is probably the best bet.

            It will probably be necessary to go the extra mile unless you get lucky.

            Best of fortune!

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Housing Bubble Correction

              Thanks for the advice, c1ue.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Housing Bubble Correction

                zoog,

                i appreciate your report "from the front." i especially appreciate your observation about mortgage availability. having read about this stuff for some time, i expected housing to turn down, turnover to slow, etc. but i never conceived of the possibility of mortgage availability shifting as much as it appears to have done in so short a time. it makes me think more about ej's piece about the myth of the slow crash.

                re your situation, the only other thought i would add is to re-examine your motivation for selling. this might lead to a decision to stay or at least clarification of exactly how motivated you are to sell.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Housing Bubble Correction

                  Originally posted by jk View Post
                  zoog,

                  i appreciate your report "from the front." i especially appreciate your observation about mortgage availability. having read about this stuff for some time, i expected housing to turn down, turnover to slow, etc. but i never conceived of the possibility of mortgage availability shifting as much as it appears to have done in so short a time. it makes me think more about ej's piece about the myth of the slow crash.

                  re your situation, the only other thought i would add is to re-examine your motivation for selling. this might lead to a decision to stay or at least clarification of exactly how motivated you are to sell.
                  Exactly what has happened to me, jk. I looked at past housing bubbles and said, ok, they take a few years to go up, a few years to go down... as long as you're paying attention and you didn't buy right at the peak, should have ample time to sell and get out. I failed to factor in the possibility of the mortgage tap being turned off so quickly. Myth of the slow crash indeed!

                  Staying in the house is certainly an option. It's a complicated calculation / guessing game / self-analysis to determine a point at which you abandon trying to sell, and, to borrow from EJ's Antispin today, tie yourself to the mast and ride out the storm. Just not sure I want to stay in this particular boat for another X-many years.

                  I hope others chime in about their local markets, I find it interesting. According to the Case/Shiller numbers, as of June the biggest drops from peak are Detroit (-13.76%), Tampa (-7.86%), San Diego (-7.30%), Washington DC (-6.99%), Phoenix (-6.55%), Miami (-5.69%), and Las Vegas (-5.50%).

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Housing Bubble Correction

                    From Alan Abelson's Barron's column 10/8/07

                    http://online.barrons.com/article/SB...gazine_columns


                    Originally posted by Abelson
                    Go Figure

                    ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH THE NEW calculus? We fervently hope that you are, for anyone who isn't will have the gravest difficulty in making sense-much less dollars-out of the stock market's sudden and astonishing metamorphosis. No, we don't mean the new math. Compared with the new calculus that's strictly circa Paleolithic, when folks did their sums by counting on their hairy fingers and toes. The new calculus is at a far remove from anything so mundane as simple addition and subtraction-it literally provides another dimension.

                    Perhaps the best way to explain it is by example. In the old arithmetic, two minus three is minus-one. In the new calculus, two minus three is plus-five. The difference is that the new calculus involves exercising the power of imagination, which enables you to hopscotch the ostensibly alarming integers to arrive at their true values.

                    Thus, the detonator of last Monday's explosive stock market rally that sent the Dow soaring to new historic highs and Nasdaq to fresh six-year peaks was the admission by Citigroup and UBS they would take write-downs of $5.9 billion and $3.4 billion, respectively, to atone for having lent neither wisely nor well.

                    In the old days-say, two weeks ago-such a dire disclosure would have touched off a stampede by the investing hordes for the exits, trampling scores of unwary widows and orphans in the crush. But, instead, the revolting revelations were seized on as reason to pile into not only shares of the offending banks and their troubled ilk, but such tattered merchandise as chip makers and-we kid you not-home builders!

                    What turned the market from a swamp of warty toads into a pristine lake filled with wondrous creatures was the sweeping application of the new calculus. That the banks chose to make public confession of the horrendous errors of their ways, Wall Street reckoned with eyes agleam, meant they were confident that the worst of the subprime fiasco and the credit crunch were over, the formidable pile of leveraged-buyout loans gone sour was no big deal, and, from here on, it was all blue skies.

                    It took only enough time to say "buy" for the new calculus to further refine and enhance this cheery computation. Analysts were quick to suggest that by owning up to their massive write downs, Citigroup, UBS, Deutsche Bank and kindred lenders were not only expressing their confidence that the bad patch that had pretty much scared the world witless (granted, given the state of wits in the world, that doesn't take too much doing) was history, but that they had slyly reserved comfortably more than actually needed to cover the charges, and the significant difference would inevitably steal back into earnings, probably sooner rather than later.

                    Reluctant as we are to point it out, these reassuring murmurs not infrequently came from the very people who were blindsided by the subprime collapse and the havoc it wreaked on the credit markets the globe over. Which does, Sigh!, raise a scintilla of doubt about the perspicacity of their current analyses. At the same time, in their rush to optimism, these happy campers choose to ignore the unpleasant truth that the very things prompting those write downs also happened to be the stuff that fueled much of the banks' reported growth in recent years, and its melancholy absence won't, we're afraid, be made up by reserving a bit more than they should have.

                    As it happens, that rather spoilsport conclusion is shared (great minds and all that) by Richard Bove of Punk Ziegel. "The growth in mortgage debt was so pronounced," he observes, "that debt on residential buildings, in aggregate, is the largest debt category in the world, topping $10 trillion. The growth in this debt increased profits all along the financial chain. Origination fees were increased, sales and securitization fees went up, and the profits associated with structured financial products are believed to have soared. This growth is gone."

                    Moreover, he reminds us, in that era so recently come to an inglorious end, financial engineering ran amok. Banks and their Wall Street co-conspirators, using traditional loan products as the base, merrily churned out that wonderful and occasionally lethal brood of CMBSs, CLOs, CDOs, CDSs and the like. These carried notably plump profit margins and grew like Topsy to where today, something like $1.8 trillion are outstanding. "This growth," he warns, "may also be gone."

                    Then there's this: The key presumption that underlies the new calculus seems to us essentially bonkers. The worst isn't over; on the contrary we haven't truly begun to feel the full effects of the demise of subprime mortgages, the damage visited on the global credit markets and the unchecked disaster that is housing.

                    On this last score, Goldman Sachs stresses that the "vicious cycle" in housing-falling prices feed into rising defaults; lenders respond by scaling back; the borrowing squeeze crimps homeownership, and the resulting drop in prices feeds back into yet lower prices-still has a lot further to run. Goldman envisions a cumulative price decline of 15% this year and next, with home prices in some regional markets tumbling an awesome 30%.

                    The full impact on the economy and the consumer of the crumbling housing market is destined to become painfully visible as the months wear on. Coupled with the surging inflation in food, energy and just about every other existential necessity, plain as the nose on their faces to everyone except the sages at the Federal Reserve and their chirpy claque in Washington and Wall Street, it's eroding confidence and otherwise affecting the public psyche and taking a toll on corporate profits.

                    Thomson Financial reported last week that the early returns show third-quarter earnings of the companies in the Standard & Poor's 500 index are running 2.2% behind last year's comparable results, and the final tally is likely to show a pretty feeble 1.7% rise. In the same quarter in "06, in case you're wondering, profits were up a resounding 20%.

                    Lest we be accused of denying mention of anything positive, we duly note that the analytical prognosticators are predicting a smart 11.3% gain in S&P 500 earnings in the fourth quarter. Obviously, the poor souls must be addicted to the new calculus.
                    Jim 69 y/o

                    "...Texans...the lowest form of white man there is." Robert Duvall, as Al Sieber, in "Geronimo." (see "Location" for examples.)

                    Dedicated to the idea that all people deserve a chance for a healthy productive life. B&M Gates Fdn.

                    Good judgement comes from experience; experience comes from bad judgement. Unknown.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Housing Bubble Correction

                      Zoog -

                      Very sorry to hear of your travails.

                      Do you have a smaller mortgage and a good bit of equity? If you end up staying there and you can scrape up some discretionary income to cover additional payments, if it were possible to pull 100K - 150K out of it and put it into gold bullion, you'd very likely triple (or at very least double) that investment in the next decade, which would take a fair bit of the sting out of remaining parked in a home against your will. Portland sounds to me like a damn fine town to be parked, if you have to be parked somewhere.

                      Depends how convinced you are that gold is headed inevitably for a massive blow off at much higher levels than it is priced today.

                      I read here of other 'carry trades" involving homes (with bonds), but I see that as a much less fortunate combination than hedging your home's potential decline by owning a really significant chunk of gold.

                      Scenario is - inflation eats at the net present value of your outstanding mortgage, and effectively shrinks it - (possibly a lot!). Inflation will also for some of the future years deflate property values so those two effects are largely a wash. But what will be rising against all assets is gold, and if housing is deflating, gold will be rising particularly strongly against homes. Seems to me if you could peel a significant portion of your home's equity into gold metal, you could end up in a quite decent position regardless.

                      One thing you could do in that scenario is decide you and your family are "going spartan", and figure out some square footage to rent out as a studio apartment (a garage?). The income from that might pay a chunk of your added debt service from taking 150K out of the house and parking it in gold.

                      Just a thought.

                      I met a man today at my local Costco who was a San Diegan, but who fifteen years ago picked up his young family and moved to southern Argentina. For six hundred thousand USD, he bought thirty square miles of prime vineyards. He was presenting a superb Argentine Malbec red wine at Costco. The Malbec wine was very damn good! He told me even during the worst of the Argentine hyperinflation, his property never went down more than 25% in USD. The guy was weatherbeaten and burned by years in the sun. He was wearing one of those sweatstained flat brimmed gaucho hats, and he was quite obviously a guy who spent his life working the land.

                      It was interesting to have the owner of a large "estancia" who has 100 men on his payroll, but looks like just another farmhand himself, then show up at Costco to tell people he makes a realy good red wine!

                      Argentina saw a far worse hyperinflation than the US will probably face, and it was by no means a disaster for the value of his property. This beat up looking farmer and his property are apparently now worth north of twenty million USD.

                      I am in San Diego, and I read all these breathless articles about catastrophe about to strike this local market. Yes, there are a good deal more houses for sale citywide, but as I drive around neighborhoods, (not the teeming condo developments which do have forests of for sale signs), I notice it's not exactly a "bloodbath" in the single famly home market, and we are supposed to be one of the worse city markets in the US.

                      Frankly, the "housing implosion" going on down here is a huge yawn. Not a whole lot of blood in the streets that I can see, with or without the credit crunch. I sold a home in a very central area two years ago. I've not exactly made any huge killing in stocks or gold, or anything else. Meanwhile I get the sense the people and homes I've been watching can hardly be described as "losing their shirts".

                      If I owned a home with a couple of hundred K equity in this market, and I could jigger my income versus mortgage payments to handle it, I'd peel out a big fat chunk of equity and put it into gold metal. I am fairly convinced it's going to do extraordinarily well. Those with even just a tiny scrap of vision looking forwards will suggest it's now inevitable that gold will move in a larger way. If you were able to park 100K or 150K in gold and silver and stomach the volatility, you might even manage to pay off your remaining mortgage with the profits from that in a decade's time.

                      I know a lot of people on this website are hesitant to peer into the future and see gold climbing well north of two thousand dollars an ounce in the next five to ten years. All I can say to them is if that is their view with all the data we now have at hand, they are looking at the present markets like pinched accountants, who are much more adept at looking in the rear view mirror, than they ever are at looking forwards.

                      Best of luck to you Zoog.

                      Be bold and look at other things in the future beyond merely the nominal price of homes slipping down ten or fifteen percent in the next three years. Why is that such a huge deal? If you have other assets to hedge, or you can pull some assets to hedge out of what you've got, you could do quite well indeed with a big hedge in gold, and find you owned that home free and clear in 10 - 15 years anyway. Stranger things have been known to happen. :rolleyes:

                      Much of the feeling of tearing need to get out property now stems from peer pressure. Everyone (especially in these online bearish communities - and despite iTulip's objections at being labeled "bearish" I suggest they are one) is now beginning to shift into that mindset, and it exerts a pull on our thinking just as much as the anxiety to get into real estate exerted a pull three or four years ago. Tune out the nervous chatter, and crunch some cautious numbers on gold hedging.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Housing Bubble Correction

                        I know a lot of people on this website are hesitant to peer into the future and see gold climbing well north of two thousand dollars an ounce in the next five to ten years. All I can say to them is if that is their view with all the data we now have at hand, they are looking at the present markets like pinched accountants, who are much more adept at looking in the rear view mirror, than they ever are at looking forwards.
                        besides this guy, that is...

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Housing Bubble Correction

                          Metalman -

                          Yeah, OK, I'll give you that much. Besides "that guy". :rolleyes:

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Housing Bubble Correction

                            Originally posted by Lukester View Post
                            Zoog -

                            Very sorry to hear of your travails...

                            ...I am in San Diego, and I read all these breathless articles about catastrophe about to strike this local market. Yes, there are a good deal more houses for sale citywide, but as I drive around neighborhoods, (not the teeming condo developments which do have forests of for sale signs), I notice it's not exactly a "bloodbath" in the single famly home market, and we are supposed to be one of the worse city markets in the US.

                            Frankly, the "housing implosion" going on down here is a huge yawn...

                            Best of luck to you Zoog.

                            Be bold and look at other things in the future beyond merely the nominal price of homes slipping down ten or fifteen percent in the next three years...
                            zoog: Not intending to trivialize your situation by any means, but some of Lukester's notes are worth highlighting - it's all perspective I suppose.

                            Take it from someone who (currently) lives in the middle of the world's biggest sand box, there's lot's worse places to have to wait out a housing slump than Portland (or San Diego or any number of other west coast locales). You two are living in the midst of some of the most naturally beautiful territory on earth. Yes, I know the severe housing bust in Astoria a hundred years ago still weighs heavily on the minds of Oregonian homowners, but I'm sure there must be some counselling available for those still having nightmares about it .

                            Just imagine if you were stuck in Stockton, or waiting for the next hurricane to hit your illiquid piece of swamp in Florida... :eek:

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Housing Bubble Correction

                              Originally posted by metalman View Post
                              besides this guy, that is...
                              Good one!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X