A couple of pictures as background on my question whether it is likely that the now Democrat-controlled Congress may try to pass legislation specifically aimed to prevent the housing bubble implosion.
The first is a map showing distribution of percentage of new/refinanced loans into 'non-traditional' types (i.e. ARM, neg-am, interest only, jumbo, or some combination)
The second is the infamous 2004 electoral college distribution.
Obviously the demographic is the urban/dense areas vs. rural, but is the relatively large percentage of 'nontraditional' loans also just coincidence?
There are of course exceptions: Florida...we do remember that situation? and Nevada in particular
What do you think?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01652/01652b1391da2b37005a05c0fcc1b8b3da89328c" alt=""
The first is a map showing distribution of percentage of new/refinanced loans into 'non-traditional' types (i.e. ARM, neg-am, interest only, jumbo, or some combination)
The second is the infamous 2004 electoral college distribution.
Obviously the demographic is the urban/dense areas vs. rural, but is the relatively large percentage of 'nontraditional' loans also just coincidence?
There are of course exceptions: Florida...we do remember that situation? and Nevada in particular
What do you think?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01652/01652b1391da2b37005a05c0fcc1b8b3da89328c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9e04/d9e04ff96d04d992394f4f86994e49c29ddddf87" alt=""
Comment