Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ascent of Money

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ascent of Money

    Excellent series of videos, although you will need your critical thinking skills:

    Originally posted by Silver Moon Rising
    The "Ascent of Money" is a very interesting video series. It is a series of six 50-minute shows that, "examines the origins of the pillars of the world's financial system, and how behind every great historical phenomenon – empires and republics, wars and revolutions – there lies a financial secret." For your viewing convenience, here are links to each 10-minute segment on YouTube:

    Episode 1: Dreams of Avarice
    "From Shylock's pound of flesh to the loan sharks of Glasgow, from the 'promises to pay' on Babylonian clay tablets to the Medici banking system, Professor Ferguson explains the origins of credit and debt and why credit networks are indispensable to any civilisation."

    Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 Part 5

    Episode 2: Human Bondage
    "How did finance become the realm of the masters of the universe? Through the rise of the bond market in Renaissance Italy. With the advent of bonds, war finance was transformed and spread to north-west Europe and across the Atlantic. It was the bond market that made the Rothschilds the richest and most powerful family of the 19th century. And today governments are asking it to bail them out."

    Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 Part 5


    Episode 3: Blowing Bubbles
    "Why do stock markets produce bubbles and busts? Professor Ferguson goes back to the origins of the joint stock company in Amsterdam and Paris. He draws telling parallels between the current stock market crash and the 18th-century Mississippi Bubble of Scottish financier John Law and the 2001 Enron bankruptcy. He shows why humans have a herd instinct when it comes to investment, and why no one can accurately predict when the bulls might stampede."

    Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 Part 5

    Episode 4: Risky business
    "Life is a risky business – which is why people take out insurance. But faced with an unexpected disaster, the state has to step in. Professor Ferguson travels to post-Katrina New Orleans to ask why the free market can't provide adequate protection against catastrophe. His quest for an answer takes him to the origins of modern insurance in the early 19th century and to the birth of the welfare state in post-war Japan."

    Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 Part 5

    Episode 5:
    "It sounded so simple: give state-owned assets to the people. After all, what better foundation for a property-owning democracy than a campaign of privatisation encompassing housing? An economic theory says that markets can't function without mortgages, because it's only by borrowing against their assets that entrepreneurs can get their businesses off the ground. But what if mortgages are bundled together and sold off to the highest bidder?"

    Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 Part 5

    Episode 6: Chimerica
    "Since the 1990s, once risky markets in Asia, Latin America and eastern Europe have become better investments than the UK or US stock market. The explanation is the rise of 'Chimerica', the economic marriage of China and the United States. But does it make sense for poor Chinese savers to lend to rich American spenders?"

    Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 Part 5

  • #2
    Re: Ascent of Money

    Originally posted by Sapiens View Post
    Excellent series of videos, although you will need your critical thinking skills:
    Is the rest good? And who is Prof. Niall Ferguson ?

    I watched the last Episode on Chimerica with Soros, WW1, LTCM etc


    I was interested when he called the British Empire a narco state during the first globalisation, but I didn't buy his WW1 view .....

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Ascent of Money

      Originally posted by D-Mack View Post
      Is the rest good? And who is Prof. Niall Ferguson ?
      I'll answer my own question



      There was some info I didn't know and according to wiki he is a historian
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niall_Ferguson

      He wrote two books on the history of the Rothschilds, that might explain why two members are featured in his movie.

      All in all I have the feeling he leaves out a bit of info and twists some things.

      Especially his justification for the Pinochet coup surprised me, but knowing that he supports the foreign policy of G.W.B. it's probably not that surprising

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Ascent of Money

        Looks like I like to talk to myself, but I stumbled upon a discussion with Niall Ferguson and thought I post it here.


        some excerpts

        Michigan City, Ind.: During the period of enforcement of Glass-Steagall in the United States we had very few bank failures. Beginning with its lax enforcement and continuing through the period since its repeal we have seem a growing number of failures of larger and larger banks. Do you believe its separation of commercial and investment banking, and the separation of deposit gathering and securities underwriting would be a wise move in today's environment?

        Niall Ferguson: I must say, I struggle to see what role the repeal of Glass-Steagall has played in the recent crisis. Nearly all the problems that have struck the financial sector since August 2007 could have arisen if the Act had remained in force.


        ...


        Bowie, Md.: In your books you name individuals culpable for past historical bubbles. Who are in the rogues' gallery this time? Probably a host of them? Danke schon.

        Niall Ferguson: The circle of blame is quite wide, in my view. It won't do just to blame the bubbles on Alan Greenspan, though he certainly made his share of mistakes. I would also fault the SEC, which turned a blind eye to excessive leverage in the banking system, and Congress, which positively encouraged the excesses of subprime lending. And maybe a word should be said about the economics profession, many of whose leading lights were remarkably slow to spot the trouble that was approaching.

        ....

        Michigan City, Ind.: I believe that the generation of mortgage backed securities, and their collateralization by a subsidiary of the same firm, and their insurance by yet another arm of the same corporation leads to lax standards that may have been more properly policed if each of them was a totally separate entity. Do you disagree?

        Niall Ferguson: I am not sure. A lot of these functions were in fact performed by separate entities. And within the big banks, I was always struck by how little communication there was between different divisions.

        http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112101708.html

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Ascent of Money

          Originally posted by Sapiens View Post
          Excellent series of videos, although you will need your critical thinking skills:
          Thanks for posting Sapiens/Silver Moon Rising.
          Related to this great documentary:


          Niall Ferguson - Mary Poppins & Financial History
          why bankers underestimated the liquidity crisis

          Excerpt from Niall Ferguson speaking about his book and TV series "The Ascent of Money" at the London School of Economics and Political Science. Broadcast on BBC Parliament, 14 December 2008

          Runtime: 6min.40sec

          Comment

          Working...
          X