Jimmy Rogers

[xtronics]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmrp9KQq1v0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NunarCoYlJs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KYlpsMuvmNU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEKGV3DLuyM

Says - not at bottom yet.

I think he is bulls-eye on with his takes on all of this. I like to have my point of view challenged - tell me why - back it up with something - but tell me why you think Rogers is wrong.

Hearing opposing arguments is very important -- I want to hear why he is wrong. If you just have insults or the like, save your breath, but if you can explain why one of his points is wrong, let us know why.

[metalman]

Re: Jimmy Rogers

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmrp9KQq1v0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NunarCoYlJs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KYlpsMuvmNU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEKGV3DLuyM

Says - not at bottom yet.

I think he is bulls-eye on with his takes on all of this. I like to have my point of view challenged - tell me why - back it up with something - but tell me why you think Rogers is wrong.

Hearing opposing arguments is very important -- I want to hear why he is wrong. If you just have insults or the like, save your breath, but if you can explain why one of his points is wrong, let us know why.

too simple minded to my taste. rogers' solution...

1. pretend that a bunch of financial boyz aren't dangling 50 million workers along with themselves off a cliff by a string.
2. claim that letting the string snap will teach the financial boyz a lesson without making 50 million unemployed.
3. pretend that the 50 million unemployed will elect pols in favor of more not less free market policy

the argument the guys have been making here since 1998...

1. regulate the financial boyz so that they are not some day dangling 50 million workers along with themselves off a cliff by a string because if you do...
2. the string will snap, taking out the financial boyz and creating 50 million unemployed....
3. ...who will elect pols in favor of less not more free market policy.

looks to me like itulip got it right again.

[D-Mack]

Re: Jimmy Rogers

Why is he against fixed exchange rates, wasn't this the success of Bretton Woods I?


Has this something to do with working with Soros?

[xtronics]

Re: Jimmy Rogers

Why is he against fixed exchange rates, wasn't this the success of Bretton Woods I?


Has this something to do with working with Soros?

Well I'm against fixed exchange rates unless they are backed by gold or something real. My fear is that the G20 will come out with a way where all 20 tax at the same rate via inflation.

Soros is a Democrat - Rogers is a Libertarian (supported Ron Paul).

[xtronics]

Re: Jimmy Rogers

1. regulate the financial boyz so that they are not some day dangling 50 million workers along with themselves off a cliff by a string because if you do...

Hmm -- already regulated - not enforced - but the appearance of regulation mandates that the gov to bail-out the crooks. Remember government has the opposit effect than intended more often than not..

2. the string will snap, taking out the financial boyz and creating 50 million unemployed....

Should take out the Wall-street suits - I think the unemployed would not be so high and not so long - a lot of bankruptcies cause zero layoffs.

3. ...who will elect pols in favor of less not more free market policy.

Only the gullible want more government.


But lets move on to what he actually said in the clips: not being at a bottom yet, buying Chinese stocks for the long term, buying gold coins - you disagree?