Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Doctrine Alert

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Doctrine Alert

    Way to quick to throw that word around? I don't think I've mentioned the word. In the present context, I believe this was the first mention of racism, yours: "I bet you are one of those people who think "only" whites can be racist?" Or that I'm on "a crusade to destroy whites."

    But here's you on another thread:

    "Raz, once you open your eyes and see what is going on its like wtf? I try to be as objectivist as possible. Want to hear a funny story?

    I am sitting at this "event" at my university a few years back and this black commentator was discussing his book (about racism etc) or something like that. After he was finished a white student raises his hand and he is called on. He then says "I am sorry for racism and I apologize to you for that, I am sorry for what my ancestors did and I strive to make up for my racist past."

    i was literally floored.... I couldnt stand it. This is the brainwashing of "white youths" in this country and if you want to read more about the white stigma of racism you need only read Shelby Steele. A black author by the way."

    After your claim that "I have seen many "mobs" as that video calls them of Indians attacking whites in Santa Cruz" I suggested that you should cite a source. They've now become muggings? No source. (And BTW my point is not that there is or is not instances of racially motivated violence against whites, that indigenous people are somehow incapable of racism. My point is that the violence is not equally on "both sides" because Evo's party has no need to resort to violence, they have trounced the opposition in two elections, as suggested by the fact that the police were trying to avoid confrontations. If you were at all aware of what's been going on there over the past few years you would know that the violence is overwhelmingly from the opposition in the Media Luna.)

    I have never accused you of racism. What I've accused you of is a lack of any outrage at racist motivated violence which is really what your "funny story" above illustrates. It's also illustrated by your flippant response to some of the most disturbing images of racial hatred I've ever seen. (Did you actually watch the video where a woman at an opposition rally refers to Indians as dogs.)

    I've characterised the opposition movements in the Media Luna departments as instigators of racist hatred in its campaign against a democratically elected goverment.

    I've asked for some reference to opposition parties in the Media Luna or leaders that are not tainted with associations to the actions described above. Some honourable, democratic opposition? I'm sure there are some and I'm sure they unequivocally condemned these shameful actions as did all of Latin America. Do you know of any?

    So what does your first hand knowledge amount to? Not much, it would appear, since you don't seem to have heard of the Pando Massacre. The body count was 30 I believe, not one as you bizarrely claim:

    "UNASUR's commission on the violent events of last September 11th in Pando, Bolivia presented their finding to Evo yesterday. The report is unequivical in its characterization of the campesino massacre and those responsible, the rightwing Prefectura of Leopoldo Fernandez. Eduardo Garcia of Reuters gives you the straight story, or if you feel like sifting through the ugly details go read the report yourself (Spanish only)."

    How can I know what kind of mine you would have? Because you think the suffering and humiliation of these people is a "joke."

    As to the source, the writer of Inca Kola is an equity analyst who also writes on Latin American economics for Roubini's RGE Monitor. (You have failed to cite any references for any of your claims, respond to any requests for more detail on your position and you are questioning my sources?) As such, he covers Latin American mining stocks and owns and dicusses many. So do I. As someone who fully understands the importance of the sector to the region he decries the undeniable criminal actions documented in pictures in the link. There's nothing funny about it.

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Doctrine Alert

      strong post, oddlots. thanks.

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Doctrine Alert

        Here you go, Indian gangs lynching and killing people in la paz and this from 2 seconds of searching google....

        http://www.russiatoday.com/news/news/34249


        http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/..._10021755.html


        what were you saying again? When I have more time I will bring you more. Who cares that a white bolivian calls an indian a dog? the insults go both ways, calling names is not "earth shattering"

        No i was making an example that one person killing another is not considerd a massacre. That video just shows people in the water? it does not show people being massacred, I told you i would research it.

        What is wrong with my post on another thread?? There is nothing wrong with that post kid. You dont have to call me a racist, I know exactly what you are suggesting. You are a very pathetic person who cannot be objective in this situation because you are not "on the ground" in bolivia to see the daily problems, marches, stabbings, robberies, killings etc. You are an ignorant american who firmly believes what a bunch of non accredited websites post.

        Here is the christiansciencemonitor, hardly a far right organization or even right organization it is left of center with a pretty objective article on Bolivia.

        http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/1007/p09s01-coop.html

        What would you do if the govnt was trying to take your land and destroy your way of life? Fight like the indians did when the spanish tried to do the same thing 450 years ago?

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Doctrine Alert

          another article on unsubstantiated claims from Pando

          http://www.ww4report.com/node/6463

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: Doctrine Alert

            Originally posted by ProdigyOfZen8 View Post
            another article on unsubstantiated claims from Pando

            http://www.ww4report.com/node/6463
            what does it mean that russia isn't playing along? sending ships to venezuela? brazil arming? is the monroe doctrine over anyway?

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: Doctrine Alert

              I have been reading several articles were 18 people were killed, 16 on the Government side and 2 on the opposition. STOP spreading lies about 30 people massacred on the govnt side and no killings on the other side.

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: Doctrine Alert

                Russia is supporting Venezuela and Bolivia in south america etc. I dont want this guy on here spreading propoganda. yes people were killed on BOTH sides in Pando and those were mestizos fighting the indians, mestizos are mixed european and indian. Only 15% of the bolivian population is White and 95% of that population is in Santa Cruz not the far far away area of Pando on the brasilian border.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: Doctrine Alert

                  I have been reading several articles were 18 people were killed, 16 on the Government side and 2 on the opposition. STOP spreading lies about 30 people massacred on the govnt side and no killings on the other side.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: Doctrine Alert

                    Just because a government is democratically elected DOES NOT mean the country has democracy, Hitler was also democratically elected my dear son. Communism and socialism has killed FAR more than fascism has over the last 100 years, by millions of people!

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: Doctrine Alert

                      OHHH look at this ODD LOTS the video you posted of the PANDO massacre is guess what A FAKE!!!! check it out

                      http://www.topix.com/forum/world/bol...1R4BA16EUCH817

                      http://www.topix.com/forum/world/bol...BK42QJ1AGHUMNT

                      Next time check you freakin sources and stop spreading propoganda!

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: Doctrine Alert

                        Originally posted by metalman View Post
                        strong post, oddlots. thanks.
                        I'm curious Metalman. Why aren't you clamoring for the Bouncer to come over here and mete out some of his discipline? People getting accused to their face of racism, or people propounding overt racism, according to Oddlots assertion? Sounds all quite inflammatory and personal, eh? Oh, it must have slipped your mind that we have a new and essential "robocop" function here you've so warmly endorsed for such events.

                        But in my regard you've indulged in posting multiple comments about how essential that "moderation" was and how oppressive such posters are. Meanwhile I see a couple of fairly direct personal affronts in this thread, on both sides. Incidentally I also object to ProdigyOfZen being summarily labeled a "racist" here. He might be, but he might easily and quite plausibly also not be.

                        How the hell could anyone determine that credibly from this string of posts, eh? That's a fairly inflamed term, "racist" and his reaction is understandably inflamed in response. Being called a racist is somewhat more "inflaming" than being called a mere asshole. Meanwhile Metalman is sitting in the galleries contentedly munching peanuts and issuing kudos, entirely oblivious of his numerous injunctions yesterday and this morning that the new guidelines of mutual respect be observed at all times. :rolleyes:

                        In case I am misunderstood - I firmly ENDORSE the right of both Oddlots and ProdigyOfZen to give and take on even third rail subjects such as racism and to discuss these questions in detail, and with impunity, notably to not be under any "threat" from iTulip's new "cop". I don't like the "cop" idea, don't like the overbearing avatar notion to begin with, and I like it that both Oddlots and ProdigyOfZen can hash this out to their own satisfaction. Metalman, as you seem oblivious to the point unless it's placed under your nose - you employ double standards - likely in the service of your personal peeves, as your obliviousness to the "hot" polemics on this thread and sudden amnesia that this is a job for the robocop to "put the fires out" evidences.

                        "Putting the fires out" in a thread like this is censorship. Plain and simple. They can do it if they like, but I for one will strongly disapprove. I wish to register full support for these two posters having a no-holds-barred discussion to the best of their ability or interest on this, or any other topic. All the "muzzling in the interests of a more productive community" IMO is BS.
                        Last edited by Contemptuous; February 03, 2009, 03:50 PM.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: Doctrine Alert

                          it's rant and rave. maybe it's the back alley behind the itulip bar and grill where they smoke and slap each other around. maybe the bouncer doesn't come out here.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Re: Doctrine Alert

                            Fine, as it's rant and rave and you are sanctioning all of their direct repartee, allow me to suggest you get off the preacher's "good behavior and good manners" soap box for a while, just to give my headache some mild relief? Thanks.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Re: Doctrine Alert

                              Originally posted by Lukester View Post
                              Fine, as it's rant and rave and you are sanctioning all of their direct repartee, allow me to suggest you get off the preacher's "good behavior and good manners" soap box for a while, just to give my headache some mild relief? Thanks.
                              not sanctioning anything. who am i to sanction anything? it's an observation. for all i know the bouncer is still trying to figure it out, or the bouncer is fred, or a fred, and they haven't figured out if rant and rave is covered by the usual rules of conduct. if you want my opinion i'd say they should. if anyone wants to beat someone up in a forum, they can do it elsewhere, down the street, say, at the marketticker forum where they shit on each other all day long.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: Doctrine Alert

                                Originally posted by metalman View Post
                                they haven't figured out if rant and rave is covered by the usual rules of conduct. if you want my opinion i'd say they should. if anyone wants to beat someone up in a forum, they can do it elsewhere, down the street, say, at the marketticker forum where they shit on each other all day long.
                                Then clear out from this forum thread Metalman. This is the "breath of fresh air" area where people can discuss third rail topics without requriring your sanction of their endeavor. To me that is distinctly a breath of fresh air compared to your approach. You like to invoke the "don't like it then go elsewhere" mantra frequently. I've seen you offer that up to dissenters on several occasions and you do it without a second thought. "Smug and complacent" comes to my mind observing those displays. This thread is inappropriate for your standards of conduct. Leave it to some others of us who believe in unfettered free posting to endorse their complete freedom here. This thread's inflammatory topic is presumably "slumming it" for your high standards. What are you doing in here?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X