Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Trump to win?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Trump to win?

    I still can't reply to posts due to that post #1000 about the epipen price scandal. vt, do you think you could repost it without all the extraneous links?

    Here's the article from your second link. Next time someone says Trump is unqualified to be president because of associating with racists, ask them if the same applies to Clinton for schmoozing with a pro-sharia woman who translated and edited a book promoting child marriage, female genital mutilation, wife-beating, stoning, and the forced separation of the sexes. This woman is her top aid and confidant's mother for crying out loud!

    http://nypost.com/2016/08/28/huma-ab...ti-women-book/

    As secretary of state, women’s-rights champ Hillary Clinton not only spoke at a Saudi girls school run by her top aide Huma Abedin’s *anti-feminist mother, but Clinton invited the elder Abedin to participate in a State Department event for "leading thinkers" on women’s issues.

    This happened despite *evidence at the time that Saleha M. Abedin had explored the religious merits of sexual submissiveness, child marriage, lashings and stonings for adulterous women, and even the *circumcision of girls.

    The elder Abedin, whose daughter helps run Clinton’s presidential campaign, did take a pro-gender-equality stance on at least one issue: Muslim women’s right to participate in violent jihad alongside men.

    As The Post first reported, Huma’s mom edits the Journal of Muslim Minority *Affairs, which has suggested that America had 9/11 coming to it, because of "sanctions" and "injustices" the US allegedly imposed on the Muslim world.

    The journal also opposed women’s rights as un-Islamic, arguing that " ‘empowerment’ of women does more harm than benefit."

    But that’s not all.

    In 1999, Saleha translated and edited a book titled "Women in Islam: A Discourse in Rights and Obligations," published by the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs. Written by her Saudi colleague Fatima Naseef, the book explains that the stoning and lashing of adulterers, the killing of apostates, sexual submissiveness and even female genital mutilation are all permissible practices *under Sharia law.

    "The wife should satisfy her husband’s desire for sexual intercourse," the book states on Page 202, even if she is not in the mood. "She has no right to abstain except for a reasonable cause or legal prohibition."

    But getting in the mood may be difficult. The book says female genital mutilation is permissible: *"Cir*cumcision for women is *allowed."

    Laws promoting feminist equality, moreover, are ineffectual, since "man-made laws have in fact enslaved women, submitting them to the cupidity and caprice of human beings. Islam is the only solution and the only escape."

    And forget about working in a position of authority: "Her job would involve long hours of free mixing and social interaction with the opposite sex, which is forbidden in Islam," the book says.

    "Moreover, women’s biological constitution is different from that of men. Women are fragile, emotional and sometimes unable to handle difficult and strenuous situations," it explained. "Men are less emotional and show more perseverance."

    There is one exception to the sexual division of roles: "Women can also participate in fighting when jihad *becomes an individual duty."

    On the back cover, Saleha says she is "pleased to launch" the book as part of a series on the study of women’s rights in Islam sponsored by the International Islamic Committee for Woman and Child (IICWC), for which she is listed as chairperson.

    Founded by Huma’s mom, the Cairo-based IICWC has advocated for the repeal of Egypt’s Mubarak-era laws in favor of implementing Sharia law, which could allow female genital mutilation, child marriage and marital rape.

    Saleha is paid by the Saudi government to advocate and spread Sharia in non-Muslim countries like America.

    In 1995, less than three weeks before Clinton gave her famous women’s-rights speech in Beijing, Saleha headlined an unusual Washington conference organized by the Council on American-Islamic Relations to lobby against the UN platform drafted by Clinton and other feminists. Visibly angry, she argued it runs counter to Islam and was a "conspiracy" against Muslims.

    Specifically, she called into question provisions in the platform that condemned domestic battery of women, apparently expressing sympathy for men who commit abuse.

    Pakistan-born Saleha main*tained that men who serially beat women tend to be unemployed, making their abuse somehow more understandable. "They are victims of a different kind," she claimed. "And they are simply taking [their frustrations] out on women."

    Despite all this, Huma Abedin in 2010 arranged for Clinton, then the secretary of state, to travel to Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, to meet with her mother and speak at a girls school she founded and helps run as dean. Speaking to a roomful of girls, Clinton said Americans have to stop stereotyping Saudi women as oppressed, before assuring the audience that not all American women go "around in a bikini bathing suit."

    While there, Clinton formed a partnership with Saleha’s Dar al-Hekma college called the US-Saudi Women’s Forum on Social Entrepreneurship, and prom*ised to reverse post-9/11 curbs on Saudi student visas to America.

    ‘The wife should satisfy her husband’s desire for sexual intercourse.’ - from a book translated and edited by Saleha Abedin

    The next year, Clinton invited Saleha and the president of the Saudi school to Washington to participate in a State Department colloquium on women, as revealed by internal emails released in response to a lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch.

    Clinton campaign spokesman Nick Merrill told the Post that while Huma Abedin was in fact listed as an editorial staffer of her mother’s radical journal from 1996 to 2008, she didn’t really do anything for the publication in her long tenure there.

    Asked if Clinton regrets honoring the Islamist mother and bestowing *legitimacy on her extreme views, Merrill had no comment.

    Be kinder than necessary because everyone you meet is fighting some kind of battle.

    Comment


    • Re: Trump to win?

      Originally posted by LazyBoy View Post
      Great post, Shiny!

      A ton of great points. I want to expand on one:
      "Policy, policy, policy" is just "Impression Management" until it's implemented.
      In other words: promises.

      I think it was Woodsman who predicted that all the new, Bernie-driven planks in
      the DNC platform will go in the round file the day after she's elected. I agree.
      She doesn't care about us. And asking her to care about us after we elect her
      isn't a good plan. Look at her track record and, as you pointed out, her refusal
      to release the transcripts to her lucrative Wall Street talks.

      If congress gives her a chance, I'll even bet she signs the TPP. She may deign to
      give us an excuse why.
      Since I know we don't agree on this issue, just checking to see if you and shiny! are in the Woodsman camp; vote Trump and hope it breaks the system.

      Comment


      • Re: Trump to win?

        Originally posted by santafe2 View Post
        Since I know we don't agree on this issue, just checking to see if you and shiny! are in the Woodsman camp; vote Trump and hope it breaks the system.
        I'm not. If Trump is elected, I hope it breaks the system like Woodsman wants. But I'm not confident that it will. So that hope won't get my vote.

        Bernie was my guy. HRC is no substitute. I waffled some on voting lesser evil instead of not evil, but no more. I can't vote HRC. I haven't looked hard enough at Jill, yet. (But we match pretty well on those internet choose-a-candidate quizzes.)

        Comment


        • Re: Trump to win?

          Shiny, I haven't been able to get into post 1,000 to edit and didn't mean to post the entire article, just the text. I'll try later.

          Comment


          • Re: Trump to win?

            Facebook is censoring too. The fix is in across all media.

            http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016...hillary-video/

            I didn't like this guy but Hillary outdid him by a mile in this department:

            https://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net...54&oe=58393A54

            Comment


            • Re: Trump to win?

              Originally posted by LazyBoy View Post
              I'm not. If Trump is elected, I hope it breaks the system like Woodsman wants. But I'm not confident that it will. So that hope won't get my vote.

              Bernie was my guy. HRC is no substitute. I waffled some on voting lesser evil instead of not evil, but no more. I can't vote HRC. I haven't looked hard enough at Jill, yet. (But we match pretty well on those internet choose-a-candidate quizzes.)
              Thanks for the straight-up post. You know my position so I won't sell my own book. I will be interested to know who gets your vote.

              Comment


              • Re: Trump to win?

                Originally posted by vt View Post
                Facebook is censoring too. The fix is in across all media.

                http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016...hillary-video/

                I didn't like this guy but Hillary outdid him by a mile in this department:

                https://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net...54&oe=58393A54
                it was 17 minutes he [or rosemary woods] erased, not just 30 seconds. my favorite explanation is in the movie DICK.

                Comment


                • Re: Trump to win?

                  I thought it was 18 minutes. But was it like the 18 minutes in the movie Contact where the minutes were actually hours?

                  Comment


                  • Re: Trump to win?

                    Originally posted by vt View Post
                    I thought it was 18 minutes. But was it like the 18 minutes in the movie Contact where the minutes were actually hours?
                    sorry, 18.5min actually.

                    Comment


                    • Re: Trump to win?

                      trump sandwich.JPG

                      received this from a friend. click to expand

                      Comment


                      • Re: Trump to win?

                        File under our famously free elections.

                        Even before the FBI identified new cyberattacks on two separate state election boards, the Department of Homeland Security began considering declaring the election a "critical infrastructure," giving it the same control over security it has over Wall Street and the electric power grid.

                        The latest admissions of attacks could speed up that effort possibly including the upcoming presidential election, according to officials.

                        http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/ho...rticle/2600592

                        Comment


                        • Re: Trump to win?

                          Trump's Son Questions Clintons' Enormous Wealth


                          "Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump’s son Eric Trump questioned Friday how Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton and former President Bill Clinton became enormously wealthy running a charity, which has become the focus of the campaign’s allegation of pay-to-play corruption while she was secretary of state.
                          “The question I always ask is, what product were they selling? If we make a buck, we sold a bottle of wine or an apartment, or we sold a hotel room. What product were they selling to make $150 million,” Mr. Trump said on Fox News’ “Fox & Friends.”
                          Host Ainsley Earhardt suggested: “Favors? The government?”

                          “Of course,” responded Mr. Trump, who works on the campaign for his billionaire businessman father.
                          “This is the leadership we have in this country. Somebody sets up a foundation. They pocket hundreds of millions of dollars. They say they come out of the White House ‘dead broke.’ Now they are worth $150 million,” he said.
                          Mrs. Clinton famously claimed that they were “dead broke” when they left the White House in 2001."


                          http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...s-wealth-what/

                          Comment


                          • Re: Trump to win?

                            dup deleted....

                            see the next for more (since its quite the collection of documented fraud, malfeasance, corruption, ineptitude and outright C.R.I.M.I.N.A.L activity..)

                            aka: just another day of the obozo and hill-billy show and their hostile takeover of the place formerly known as The USA...

                            now known as the Fascist State of Amerika, HQ'd in lwr manhattan (or chapaqua, depending on POV), with its wholly-owned subsidiary of vassal slaves now known as the CONgress of the FSA (or free shit army, whatevah happens to lift yer skirt...)
                            Last edited by lektrode; September 03, 2016, 06:54 PM.

                            Comment


                            • Re: Trump to win?

                              jeeeze... and i thot this thread had died
                              (since santa and jk decided to gang up on woody and were losing ;)

                              but its looking like the noose is FINALLY tightening (around her neck) now:

                              The "Oh Shit" Moment: Hillary Wiped Her Server With BleachBit Despite Subpoena


                              ... sometime within the 6 days after a call with "President Clinton's Staff," the server was wiped clean using BleachBit despite the subpoena from the House Select Committee on Benghazi received weeks earlier on March 4, 2016.

                              • Sep 3, 2016 12:05 PM
                              lets see how they wiggle'n'squirm their way out this one...
                              (since the dept of juicetess is always FOR SALE, or has been - and quite conclusively at that - since 2008, anyway (i mean REALLY, at least the perps from ENRON got taken down/jailed - but the lwr manhattan criminal syndicate? not so much...)

                              and when even Putin&co are willing to lend a hand (tugging on the noose) - as a 'public service' no less (whoda thunk it, even the russians are more public-spirited than the DNC ;)

                              Putin Says Trump/Clinton Using "Shock Tactics"; Describes DNC Hacking As "Public Service" But Denies Involvement


                              Putin accuses Clinton and Trump of using "shock tactics" while denying any Russian link to the DNC hacking...“Listen, does it even matter who hacked this data? The important thing is the content that was given to the public.’’
                              • Sep 2, 2016 7:45 PM

                              uh oh.... 'we have a problem, chapaqua...'


                              Trump Regains Lead In Latest Reuters Poll: We're Gonna Need Another "Tweak"


                              The last time Reuters/Ipsos showed Trump in the lead at the end of July, the polling methodology was promptly "tweaked", sending Trump right back into second place. It appears Reuters' poll may be due for another "tweak."
                              • Sep 3, 2016 12:15 PM
                              ooops... kinda sounds like the LAMERSTREAM MEDIA is starting to 'lose control' ?

                              Sorry, Losers! How The Fed Has Screwed The Many To Protect The Few


                              By its actions, the Federal Reserve has selected a precious few winners and many, many losers. Sadly, you are highly likely to be one of the losers. Sorry!

                              • Sep 3, 2016 1:50 PM
                              also looks like obozo & john f(raud) kerry's foggybottom have already lost it (and well on their way to ww3)

                              Tarmac Altercation Erupts Upon Obama's Arrival In China After Official Shouts "This Is Our Country, Our Airport"


                              Upon Obama's arrival in China, a member of the Chinese delegation began shouting at White House staff, demanding the pool leave the arrival scene. A White House official said Obama was our president and Air Force One was our plane and that the press was not going to move from the designated area. The Chinese official angrily responded "This is our country. This is our airport."
                              • Sep 3, 2016 11:56 AM
                              never mind 'all the help' they're getting from 'our fiends' at the top of the 'high-tech social media' foodchain (who've been doing a simply mahvelous job of 'creating jobs' - mostly OUT of The US, while they pile-up billions, again OUTSIDE The US

                              How Silicon Valley Follows The Money


                              Wall Street and Silicon Valley are two of the key strategic hubs of hyperpower global domination. The others are the industrial-military-surveillance-security complex – of which Hollywood and corporate media are the soft power extensions – and the petrodollar racket/tributary system.
                              • Sep 2, 2016 8:10 PM
                              which then begs the question (esp of those whom are 'with her' ):

                              Are You A Mind-Controlled CIA Stooge?


                              Do you smirk when you hear someone question the official stories of Orlando, San Bernardino, Paris or Nice? Do you feel superior to 2,500 architects and engineers, to firefighters, commercial and military pilots, physicists and chemists, and former high government officials who have raised doubts about 9/11? If so, you reflect the profile of a mind-controlled CIA stooge.
                              • Sep 2, 2016 9:00 PM

                              but hey!
                              this is Labor Day and EVERYTHINGS AWESOME (?)

                              right?

                              Riiiiight.....


                              Obama's Jobs 'Recovery' Explained (In 1 Cartoon)

                              A job's a job, right?



                              h/t @myLife_40NoneK

                              the comments on this one are classics (for ZH anyway)

                              well... there you have it folks, another reason to 'celebrate' - or as one member of the 'elite' political (spelt c.r.i.m.i.n.a.l) class put it a few years back "...for the first time in my life, i'm proud to be amerikan..."

                              but....too bad she has to "...wake up every morning in house built by slaves...."

                              and to think i USED-TO be a proud American

                              at least until the most corrupt+inept+bought-off administration in US history perpetrated the complete and utterly HOSTILE TAKE-OVER of the entire US.gov - that got underway in the 90's - doubled-down in the 2010's - (all the while buying their way OUT of prosecution) and will have come full-circle when the MOST CRIMINALLY CORRUPT, INEPT AND BOUGHT-OFF prezidenshull candidate in US history 'takes the oath' (unless she decides to skip that part, as it being part of 'the war on wimmen') thereby signalling that everything thats happened since the 1620's - nearly 400 years of blood, sweat, tears & treasure -

                              WAS ALL FOR NAUGHT
                              and the former USA will have been killed/bought-off by the resurrection of the old-world aristocracy right here in the new-world.

                              AND WE CAN 'thank' - with a good ole BRONX CHEER -
                              THE DEMONRAT NAT'L COMMITTEE FOR THE WHOLE GD TWISTED STORY!

                              of how their politix/policies since the 60's SCREWED this country far worse than ANYTHING osama could have EVER done to The Rest of US

                              thats right - obama, the hill-billy show and the demonrats have done more to DESTROY THE USA than ANYTHING osama could have ever done.

                              Last edited by lektrode; September 03, 2016, 02:20 PM.

                              Comment


                              • Re: Trump to win?

                                Hillary with the Ultrarich:

                                http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/04/us...ndraising.html

                                While Trump gets standing ovation at black church:

                                http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016...stries-church/

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X