Mega's dispatch from England

[Mega]

Fracking
http://www.theguardian.com/environme...imbys-minister

Ok, some back ground...........we pissed away our Northsea Oil/Gas over the last 30 years.....the "City" is a proven ponzi scam..........we are in BIG troubles. I bet that fracking will become a MEGA BIG issune in England. I think it will become bigger than the CND protests of the early 80's.

No one likes the wars, the loss of our rights march towards a police state.........but there was never an issune everyone could get behind. Sure tough on the 1 MILLION Iraq Mem,Women & children whom got killed.....sad about all those in Afgan or Syria......but the British simply "peacefully protested"........& lost intrest.

Well SUDDENLY people ARE getting intrested in Fracking, suddenly its THEM "They" are now targeting!!!!!

Mike

[Mega]

Re: Mega's dispatch from England

Mike

[shiny!]

Re: Mega's dispatch from England

Conventional oil wells are running dry, the people are mobilizing against frakking, they're banning nuclear, they don't like coal because it's dirty, solar would suck where you are because it's cloudy almost all the time... There's no realistic solution that will make them happy.

[Mega]

Re: Mega's dispatch from England

They should go with Coal............its dirt cheap right now.
As for fracking, i ask:-

How many BTU's used to produce how many BTU's.........?
Mike

[shiny!]

Re: Mega's dispatch from England

They should go with Coal............its dirt cheap right now.
As for fracking, i ask:-

How many BTU's used to produce how many BTU's.........?
Mike

Coal, maybe pebble bed nuclear reactors?

[Mega]

Re: Mega's dispatch from England

Nukes are off the menu right now because of Japan.....shame as i am holding Cameco stock..

[Mega]

Re: Mega's dispatch from England

"They" are coming for your kids!

Children given lifelong ban on talking about fracking

Two Pennsylvanian children will live their lives under a gag order imposed under a $750,000 settlement

• Share 277
• 
  
• inShare0
• Email

• Suzanne Goldenberg, US environment correspondent
  
• theguardian.com, Monday 5 August 2013 18.04 BST
  
• Jump to comments (70)

A drill pipe at a shale gas operation in Pennsylvania. Photograph: Bloomberg via Getty Images

Two young children in Pennsylvania were banned from talking about fracking for the rest of their lives under a gag order imposed under a settlement reached by their parents with a leading oil and gas company.
The sweeping gag order was imposed under a $750,000 settlement between the Hallowich family and Range Resources Ltd, a leading oil and gas driller. It provoked outrage on Monday among environmental campaigners and free speech advocates.
The settlement, reached in 2011 but unsealed only last week, barred the Hallowichs' son and daughter, who were then aged 10 and seven, from ever discussing fracking or the Marcellus Shale, a leading producer in America's shale gas boom.
The Hallowich family had earlier accused oil and gas companies of destroying their 10-acre farm in Mount Pleasant, Pennsylvania and putting their children's health in danger. Their property was adjacent to major industrial operations: four gas wells, gas compressor stations, and a waste water pound, which the Hallowich family said contaminated their water supply and caused burning eyes, sore throats and headaches.
Gag orders – on adults – are typical in settlements reached between oil and gas operators and residents in the heart of shale gas boom in Pennsylvania. But the company lawyer's insistence on extending the lifetime gag order to the Hallowichs' children gave even the judge pause, according to the court documents.
The family gag order was a condition of the settlement. The couple told the court they agreed because they wanted to move to a new home away from the gas fields, and to raise their children in a safer environment. "We need to get the children out of there for their health and safety," the children's mother, Stephanie Hallowich, told the court.
She was still troubled by the gag order, however. "My concern is that they're minors. I'm not quite sure I fully understand. We know we're signing for silence for ever but how is this taking away our children's rights being minors now? I mean my daughter is turning seven today, my son is 10."
The children's father, Chris Hallowich, went on to tell the court it might be difficult to ensure the children's absolute silence on fracking – given that their ages and that the family lives in the middle of a shale gas boom.
"They're going to be among other children that are children of people within this industry and they're going to be around it every day of their life, that if they in turn say one of the illegal words when they're outside of our guardianship we're going to have difficulty controlling that," he said. "We can tell them, they can not say this, they can not say that, but if on the playground....."
The court transcripts were released in response to an open records request by the Pittsburgh Post Gazette, which first reported on the children's lifetime gag order. The newspaper has been fighting for the release of all documents in the Hallowich settlement.
Campaigners say the secrecy has helped the industry resist more stringent environmental and health controls – by burying evidence of water contamination and health problems associated with natural gas operations. The Hallowichs' lawyer, Peter Villari, told the court he had never seen a gag order imposed on children in his 30 years of practicing law, according to the released transcript.
During the proceedings, the attorney representing Range Resources, Williams Gas/Laurel Mountain Midstream and MarkWest Energy, reaffirmed the gag order on the children. "I guess our position is it does apply to the whole family. We would certainly enforce it," he told the court.
However, once that gag order came to light, two years after the August 2011 proceedings, the company told reporters it did not agree with Swetz's comments. "We don't believe the settlement applies to children," a Range Resources spokesman told the Gazette. He went on to tell the paper that there was no evidence that the Hallowich family was affected by exposure to gas development.