Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Soon !

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Soon !

    Veteran fears 'beginning of the end' for Japan as bond market buckles

    Global markets face a witches’ brew of new risks as Japan’s monetary adventure wobbles, China slows further and the US Fed prepares to shut the spigot of dollar liquidity.

    The Bank of Japan intervened with $20bn to drive down yields again but the failure to ensure an orderly debt market has started to rattle investors Photo: Reuters









    By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard

    8:53PM BST 23 May 2013
    2 Comments


    Yields on 10-year Japanese bonds (JGBs) have doubled in a month and spiked dramatically to 1pc on Thursday, triggering a 7.3pc crash in the Nikkei stock index. It was the biggest one-day fall since the tsunami two years ago, comparable with wild moves seen at the height of the Asian crisis in 1998.


    The contagion effect set off a retreat from stocks across the world, though Wall Street later pared losses. The iTraxx Crossover or “fear gauge” for corporate bonds jumped 25 points to 392.

    The Bank of Japan (BoJ) intervened with $20bn (£13bn) to drive down yields again but the failure to ensure an orderly debt market has started to rattle investors. Banks, pension funds and insurers appear to be dumping JGBs for fear of being caught on the wrong side of a bond rout.


    Richard Koo from Nomura, an expert on Japan’s Lost Decade, said the sell-off in recent days has shown that the BoJ may not be able to hold down yields “no matter how many bonds it buys”. This could lead to a “loss of faith in the Japanese government” and the “beginning of the end” for its economy, if handled badly.

    The drama in Tokyo came amid fresh signs that China is struggling to manage the hangover from its four-year lending boom, which has pushed credit to 200pc of GDP and spawned a shadow banking system.

    Related Articles


    The HSBC manufacturing index tipped below the contraction line to 49.6 in May. “There is simply no recovery,” said Yao Wei from Societe Generale.

    China’s leaders are walking a fine line, reluctant to overdo stimulus for fear that it will leak into the property bubble and perpetuate a deformed structure. Fitch says the economic return on lending has collapsed over the past four years from a ratio of 0.8 to 0.35, a sign of credit exhaustion.
    Morgan Stanley has stopped relying on Chinese growth data to assess growth, using proxies such as Korean exports and Taiwan bonds.

    “China is slowing hard. We are concerned that leverage is higher than reported, and banks have a huge maturity mismatch,” said Hans Redeker, the bank’s currency chief.

    Global equities have risen 27pc since July, lifted first by the Fed’s “QE3”, then the move by Mario Draghi at the European Central Bank to back-stop Italy and Spain, and, finally, by the reflation blitz of Japan’s premier, Shinzo Abe.
    Mr Redeker said this phase is over as the Fed shifts gears, with the latest Fed minutes showing that several rate-setters want to wind down bond purchases as soon as June. Chairman Ben Bernanke has given mixed signals, but it is clear that the Fed’s centre of gravity is shifting.

    “The Fed is moving to neutral. That is why stocks are getting hammered. It is toxic for anybody around the world who relies on dollar funding, and that means emerging markets,” said Mr Redeker.

    Marc Ostwald of Monument Securities said Ben Bernanke had “signed the death warrant for markets”, while Julia Coronado from BNP Paribas said the Fed’s minutes were “simply astounding”, creating total confusion over when it will taper off QE. “What may be in store over the next few months is a showdown between the markets and the Fed,” she said.

    The mere promise of “Abenomics” has lifted Japanese equities by 70pc since November, with foreign hedge funds accounting for a third of all net long positions, but the dark side is becoming clear. The BoJ is purchasing enough bonds to cover 70pc of Japan’s budget deficit this year under the new governor, Haruhiko Kuroda. This is $70bn a month, almost as much as the Fed in an economy one third the size.

    Mr Kuroda has played down the spike in yields, though one of his original aims was to cut borrowing costs. “I don’t think the recent rise in yields is having a big impact on the economy,” he said.

    Officials cite the rise as proof that investors believe the BoJ will lift Japan out of deflation at long last and achieve the new inflation target of 2pc. Professor Richard Werner from Southampton University, author of Princes of the Yen, said nobody knows whether the bold gambit will succeed.

    “They have been very good at marketing, and investors just love Abenomics, but there is a widening gap between the euphoria and delivery. Very little has actually happened to credit creation so far, and without that there will not be a recovery,” he said.

    Surging yields have already caused Toyota to shelve a bond issue. The great fear is that a bond rout will set off a banking crisis since Japanese lenders hold JGBs equal to 80pc of GDP. The International Monetary Fund said a 100 point rise in yields would erode the Tier-1 capital of regional banks by 20pc.
    “At some point, the JGB market is going to crash. The crucial question is whether they can prevent the banking system from being hurt? It will be tricky, and I am not sure the BoJ has thought this through,” said Prof Werner.

    Mr Koo said the BoJ has undermined the “market structure” that has kept Japan’s bond market stable for 20 years, and invited an attack by short sellers.

    He said the bank faces a “time inconsistency problem” since markets react more quickly than the economy.
    The risk is that inflation fears will lead to bond collapse before the benefits of stimulus have fed through. But Junko Nishikoa from RBS said the fears are overblown. “The bottom line is that Japan’s economy is recovering and the BoJ will succeed in holding down risk premiums,” she said.

    Japan has taken a huge gamble, but Mr Abe says the status quo is not an option either. With public debt to reach 245pc of GDP this year, the country must restore growth in nominal GDP to head off a debt compound spiral. That Holy Grail is at last in sight.






    Share
    3
    Facebook
    1
    Twitter
    2
    Email
    LinkedIn
    0



    Economics





    In Finance »


    10 well paid jobs for 2030


    Top 10 coolest offices in the UK




    Related Partners


    In Economics

    Where UK economic growth is coming from


    'Cautious George Osborne has damaged the economy'


    Debt crisis: live


    Sign up to our weekly Money newsletter





    Share
    3
    Facebook
    1
    Twitter
    2
    LinkedIn
    0



    More from The Telegraph
    More from the web








    Advertisement
    Ads by Google







    telegraphuk

    2 comments


    Add a comment
    Comment with a Telegraph account
    Login | Register with the Telegraph
    Alternatively...
    Comment with one of your accounts



    Showing 2 comments

    Order by popular now best rating newest first oldest first

    Real-time updating is enabled. (Pause)
    1 new comment was just posted. Show





    • hubristheviceoftherich
      11 minutes ago


      The economics of the madhouse. Human beings are increasingly out of their depth politically and economically. We are witnessing an ever increasing virtual reconstruction of historically accepted reality. On the bright side it is liberating to realise that economics is a beast subject to algorithmic obedience and therefore we can all rejoice in the fact that this giant piece of theatre is at our command. On the bad side unconventional war is looming. Watch out for new strains of avian flu etc and a pandemic to end all pandemics. It is just as well the USA has placed all those nuclear warheads underground in Afghanistan ready for a potential if not probable Chinese overland march to an anticipated conquering victory.


      • Recommended by 0 person
      • Recommend
      • Report




    • chungkwoyan
      17 minutes ago


      Without any doubt, Abeconmic has reached its end already.
      Next on the list, the Anglo-Saxon brothers!



  • #2
    Re: Soon !

    AS Jim Rickards said today on Twitter:-
    "The FED will not tapper, they paper!"

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Soon !

      It amazes me that it is even a question to people. Everyone should know they are not going to taper, but will only increase the QE.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Soon !

        Originally posted by BadJuju View Post
        It amazes me that it is even a question to people. Everyone should know they are not going to taper, but will only increase the QE.
        Not everyone is lucky enough to have found this site. When judging what others "should" know, think of yourself as you were before you first came here. ;-) Where did you get your information? Do you still trust those same sources? What are they saying today?

        I can't speak for others, of course, but I've learned a fair amount since then.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Soon !

          That's the thing, though. Pretty much as soon as I got interested in economics, I became clued in. You got all of these people out there that live and breathe the stuff, yet they are oblivious.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Soon !

            Originally posted by BadJuju View Post
            That's the thing, though. Pretty much as soon as I got interested in economics, I became clued in. You got all of these people out there that live and breathe the stuff, yet they are oblivious.
            Practicing economics as a profession is a fantastic way to not understand economics.

            The problem is that economics tries, at the same time, to be both a science, and an ideology.

            By dubbing econ ”dismal science” adherents exaggerate;
            The “dismal”’s fine – it’s“science” where they patently prevaricate.

            – xkcd, “Every Major’s Terrible” (sung to the tune of“I am a Modern Major General” in
            Pirates of Penzance)
            The traditional study of the field requires one to be steeped in both scientific and ideological aspects, and the longer one practices it formally, the more ideologically-dominated one inevitably becomes. The more public one has made one's opinions, the more one is haunted by an intellectual equivalent of the sunk costs fallacy.

            You have to defend your old ideas, because your reputation is now linked to them. Tossing them aside becomes harder and harder, especially if you're famous, or advancing quickly in the field. And influential work (eg. Reinhart and Rogoff) is the worst form of entrapment.

            All science has this challenge, but most sciences also have an ability to overcome it by grounding any judgement calls in objective numbers, which elude economists.

            That's why a "serious amateur" economist actually has much more freedom to understand clearly than a "professional" does. (And why it's important to sometimes not look too closely at one's advisor's track record.) We here can more easily admit it when we are wrong, so we can evaluate more ideas, more quickly, and more thoroughly.

            If people feel like they will have to defend their every thought forever (i.e. the published literature) they will also unconsciously make calls that are easier to defend, which is to say, more mainstream in their community. And they will stick by a given thesis longer than they otherwise might, when the data supporting it might have long ago moved on to a new regime with a different limiting dynamic.

            An economist should be able to identify the perverse incentives of publishing when they see them, but if they do, I'm sure they'd have a hard time convincing their funding agencies, tenure committees, and bosses:

            "Lemme get this straight. You're saying you did a whole lot of work, but won't publish anything so that you can `remain a good economist'?"

            Renewal/tenure/promotion denied!
            I've never worried about EJ's desire, or ability, to think independently. I do occasionally wonder whether we as a community might badger him so much that he may unconsciously stick to a thesis longer than he otherwise might. But every so often he reassures me, by actively trying to disprove a current thesis (What if gold's story is really all about China?) so I'm still firmly convinced this is the best place to be. Vastly better than with someone who professionally "lives and breathes the stuff" in the traditional way.
            Last edited by astonas; May 23, 2013, 07:25 PM.

            Comment

            Working...
            X