Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

EU Central Bank Calls Bernanke Bluff

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • EU Central Bank Calls Bernanke Bluff

    The ECB Calls Bernanke’s Bluff



    -- Posted Thursday, 12 June 2008

    by Gary Dorsch, Editor, Global Money Trends

    A new member of the British Parliament once solicited the advice of Benjamin Disraeli, the nineteenth century British prime minister, on whether he should speak up on a controversial issue. “Do you have anything to say that has not already been said?” Disraeli asked him. “No,” the man conceded. “I just want the people whom I represent, and the members of Parliament to know that I participated in the debate.”

    Disraeli replied, “Then it’s better to remain silent and have people say, I wonder what he’s thinking, rather than to speak up, and have people say, I wonder why he spoke.” On June 3rd, the super-dovish Fed chief Benjamin Bernanke, couldn’t remain silent any longer, and shocked the global money markets, when he spoke out for the first time, about the need for the Fed to defend the US dollar in the foreign exchange market, before an international television audience.

    “The Fed is working with the Treasury to carefully monitor developments in foreign exchange markets,” Bernanke warned. “We are attentive to the changes in the value of the dollar and inflation expectations. The Fed’s commitment to price stability is a key factor, insuring that the dollar remains a strong and stable currency. The possibility that commodity prices will continue to rise, and lift inflation expectations are significant risks, that might ultimately become self-confirming,” he said.

    A week later, currency traders were left wondering if Bernanke had undergone a brain transplant, and re-programmed as a Bundesbank hawk, when he downplayed the biggest monthly surge in the US jobless rate in 22-years.“The risk that the US economy has entered into a substantial downturn appears to have diminished. The FOMC will strongly resist an erosion of longer-term inflation expectations. There are significant upside risks for inflation through commodities,” Bernanke declared.

    Instinctively, foreign currency traders rushed to cover over-extended short positions in the dollar, as yields on the US Treasury’s 2-year note, jumped by a startling half-percent in just two-days, to 2.90%, discounting the likelihood of 75-basis points in Fed rate hikes by year’s end. Something must have changed, to cause “Helicopter” Ben to suddenly talk about switching gears, from inflating the US money supply at a 17% annualized rate, its fastest in history, to a more prudent course of defending the purchasing power of the dollar.


    referrelative="t" o:spt="75" coordsize="21600,21600">


    But if “Helicopter” Ben is just bluffing about his determination to defend the US dollar, then it would have been better, had he remained silent last week. Foreign currency traders know the first line of defense for a currency in the $3.2 trillion per day FX market is “jawboning” – or trying to alter trader behavior and psychology with words alone. Initially, “open-mouth operations” are cost-free, and might even achieve the central bank’s objective without more expensive remedies.

    However, after the initial shock wears-off, if not backed-up by concrete action, “jawboning” begins to lose its potency. If the economic landscape hasn’t changed, then before long, quick-trigger traders could test the resolve of the central bank, by the attacking the beleaguered currency. Nowadays, it’s the dollar’s weakness against the Euro that is helping to elevate the agricultural and crude oil markets, and transmitting a major outbreak of hyper-inflation worldwide.

    But with the S&P Banking Sector Index plunging to its lowest level in 12-years, US homes prices sinking at their fastest clip since the Great Depression, and Lehman Brother’s LEH.n stock losing 54% of its value in the past four weeks, the Fed’s ability to defend the dollar with a tighter monetary policy is very limited. Just last week, Sheila Bair, head of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp, warned that “weakening real estate markets could take down bigger banks than we have seen in the past,” and would quickly exhaust the FDIC’s paltry $58 billion cash reserve.

    Furthermore, the US jobless rate jumped a half-percent in May to 5.5%, its highest level in 3-½ years, underscoring the big recessionary risks that the US economy still faces. Some 49,000 jobs were cut from payrolls in May, the fifth straight month of job losses, further sapping consumer confidence, already at a 16-year low. “Weak economic conditions could extend defaults on consumer installment or credit card loans, as well as corporate loan portfolios,” warned Fed deputy Donald Kohn.




    Yet the 2% federal funds rate is pegged far below the inflation rate, and negative interest rates spawn specualtion in the commodities markets. The US dollar remains weak against the Euro, because the yield on the 2-year US Treasury note is roughly -180 basis points below the German 2-year schatz yield. A year ago, the US 2-yr T-note was yielding +60 basis points more than the German schatz.

    On June 11th, St. Louis Fed chief James Bullard said the 2% fed funds rate is too low and could fuel inflation, unless the Fed takes action going forward. “The Fed’s easing in January and March was very sharp, for insurance against the possibility of a very bad outcome from the financial crisis. The probability of a very bad outcome from the financial crisis is now receding, and we’ve still got the low level of interest rates. I see inflationary consequences of that going forward, if we don’t take action and stay on top of this situation,” Bullard warned.

    Since the Fed began its easing campaign in August 2007, the year-over-year increase in the Dow Jones AIG Commodity Index, has soared from a -5.5% to a record +33% today, led by a near doubling in crude oil and grain prices, and pushing the global inflation rate to its highest in three decades. Yet until this month, the Bernanke Fed refused to weigh food and energy prices in its inflation calculations, and instead, solely focused on bailing out Wall Street banks.



    So what cataclysmic event finally forced Mr Bernanke to publicly acknowledge the bankruptcy of his “core inflation” thesis, which strips food and energy out of the Fed’s inflation equation? A stunning $16 per barrel surge in crude oil prices, on June 5-6th that knocked the Dow Jones Industrials to a 400-points loss, in a thunderous crash that rattled the US Treasury’s “Plunge Protection Team.”

    In a perfect storm, crude oil soared to $138 /bl, supported by a 2.5% jump in the Euro to $1.5800, and comments by Israeli deputy prime-minister Shaul Mofaz, who said Israel’s patience with Europe’s reluctance to impose tough economic sanctions on Iran is wearing thin. Mofaz set the crude oil market ablaze, when he told the Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper, “If Iran continues with its program for developing nuclear weapons, we will attack it. The sanctions are ineffective.Attacking Iran, in order to stop its nuclear plans, will be unavoidable,” he warned.

    Mofaz presented a sneak preview of what the crude oil and global stock markets might look like, under the thumb of a nuclear-armed Iran. Whether an attack on Iran or a US naval blockade of its ports, actually happens before President Bush leaves office, is a matter of great debate and speculation. On June 10th, Bush warned, “If you were living in Israel, you’d be a little nervous, if a leader in your neighborhood announced that he’d like to destroy you. And one sure way of achieving that means, is through the development of a nuclear weapon. Therefore, now is the time for all of us to work together to stop Iran,” he said, on his final tour of Europe. The next day, Bush indicated that all options are on the table, in dealing with Iran.




    But behind the scenes, the Euro /dollar exchange rate is also magnifying movements in the all-important crude oil market. “I’m very worried about the strength of the dollar. We all know when the dollar weakens, the price of oil goes up,” said Republican presidential candidate John McCain in a June 10th interview on CNBC. It was the first time a key Washington politician acknowledged the link between the weak dollar and the high price of crude oil, and by extension, other related markets that are soaring into the stratosphere, such as coal and corn futures.

    Yet as recently as May 28th, Minneapolis Fed chief Gary Stern cautioned against drawing a link between the dollar’s decline and lofty energy prices. “I’d be careful about mistaking correlation and causation. Just because energy prices and the dollar seem to move together, doesn’t mean that there’s causation there. I would point to the rapid growth in China and India that has something to do with this,” he said.

    Frederic Mishkin, a close confidant of Bernanke’s, was still defending the central bank’s practice of ignoring food and energy prices. “Stabilizing core inflation leads to better economic outcomes than stabilizing headline inflation. If central banks raise rates aggressively to counter inflation caused by a sudden rise in oil prices, unemployment will be markedly higher, than if policy-makers set borrowing costs in response to fluctuations in core prices. When inflation expectations are well anchored, the central bank does not need to raise interest rates aggressively to keep inflation under control following an aggregate supply shock,” Mishkin argued.

    Indeed, Bernanke appeared to be back-pedaling on his commitment to fight inflation, when he tried to distance the Fed from the use of the commodity prices, to forecast to direction of inflation. “The poor record of commodity futures markets in forecasting the course of prices raises the question of whether policy-makers should continue to use this source of information,” he said on June 9th. It’s difficult to combat inflation, if the Fed is blind to the realities of the marketplace.




    Finally, European central bankers couldn’t hold back their deep frustration with the Bernanke Fed’s delusional denial of commodity inflation any longer, and delivered their first bombshell in 12-months. “After carefully examining the situation, we could decide to move our rates a small amount in our next meeting, in order to secure the solid anchoring of inflation expectations,” warned ECB chief Jean “Tricky” Trichet on June 5th. “Anchoring inflation expectations” are the ECB’s code words for a baby-step quarter-point rate hike to 4.25% in July.

    Once again, “Tricky” Trichet managed to bamboozle market traders. “The ECB is not split, we have sent a clear message to the markets about what to expect in the near future. We have to let deeds follow words,” his sidekick Bundesbank chief Axel Weber said on June 5th. The ECB’s shift towards a tighter money stance, ricocheted across the world, sending bond yields surging in England, Canada, Germany, and the US, while Japanese bonds plunged to their lowest in nine months.

    Up until the ECB delivered its bombshell, the ECB was widely expected to follow in the footsteps of the Bank of England, the Bank of Canada, and the Fed, and slash its repo rate, to cushion the downfall of the European banking sector. So far, global banks have recognized $350 billion of losses from toxic sub-prime US mortgage debt, and the Swiss National Bank says the write-offs are only half-way over.




    Taking aim at the easy-money clique within the “Group of Seven” cartel, Bundesbank chief Weber argued on June 6th, that “Central banks should not cut interest rates in order to help banks with their refinancing needs, but instead, should keep monetary policy focused on maintaining price stability,” he said. Italian central banker Mario Draghi said G-7 central banks should take some of the blame for the current inflation spiral, because of “monetary policies that favor excessive money and credit growth globally, with exceptionally low interest rates.”

    The ECB stood steadfast in its battle of wits with German schatz traders, who had driven benchmark 2-year yields to as low as 3% in mid-March, betting on a series of three ECB repo rate cuts to 3.25%, to bail-out bludgeoned speculators in the Euro-zone stock markets. But the ECB refused to be bullied by schatz traders into an easier money policy, unlike other G-7 central bankers, who lost their nerve.

    Back on Feb 1st, Greek central banker Nicholas Garganas said, “Our monetary policy is not led on what the markets expect. I’m very concerned about the high inflation rate. Inflation risks remain on the upside. If there’s a risk that we’ll not achieve our objective in the medium term, we’ll act pre-emptively and decisively,” he warned. Yet the ECB waited for crude oil to soar above $125 /barrel, before signaling a baby-step rate hike, out of fear of sending the Euro through the roof.

    German schatz traders were rocked by Trichet’s bombshell last week, with 2-year yields soaring to as high as 4.80%, it’s highest in 7-years. However, the highly leveraged and volatile markets tend to overshoot, when the herd mentality kicks-in, prompting Bundesbank hawk Juergen Stark to say the ECB is not planning a series of interest rate hikes, and knocking the 2-year German yield to 4.53% today.




    But when the dust began to settle down, it became clear, that the ECB was calling “Bernanke’s Bluff” on defending the US dollar. Seizing upon Bernanke’s vow to the Int’l Monetary Conference to defend the dollar, the ECB is now testing the true intentions of the Fed, by signaling a pre-emptive repo-rate hike to 4.25%, and widening the German interest rate advantage over the US Treasury yields.

    The ECB’s is building a reputation as a tough inflation fighter, while the Bernanke Fed’s anti-inflation credibility has been badly mutilated, by the weak US dollar and the fireworks display in the commodities markets. It will take much more than a few sentences from Bernanke to undo this damage. However, the ECB is forcing the Bernanke Fed to stiffen its spine, and narrow the gap between higher yielding German notes, and lower yielding US T-notes, by lifting the fed funds rate, in order to make good on its pledge to defend the dollar.

    In the past, European central bankers tended to follow the US Federal Reserve, on setting interest rates. This time however, while the Fed slashed rates 325 basis points, the Europeans refused to follow, and are now moving in the opposite direction with a baby-step rate hike.This suggests that in terms of global monetary policy, we’re witnessing a historic shift in the balance of power, with the ECB now dictating policy to the Fed, another sign of America’s loss of global hegemony.

    The Bernanke Fed has contributed greatly to the surge in global inflation, by pegging the fed funds rate deep into negative territory, and neglecting the dollar’s loss of value. The ECB’s power-play to force the Fed into a partial reversal of its rate cuts, comes at a time when German factory orders have declined for five straight months, and carries the risk of weakening the European and global economy.




    Adding to the tension, crude oil prices are perched above $125 /barrel, the tipping point that can derail the global economy into a wreck. Yet the alternative, a march into the abyss of hyper-inflation, could lead to an even greater turbulence and a economic depression. Taking the lead among the G-7 central banks in stopping the march towards hyper-inflation, the ECB has engineered a sharp decline in the German schatz market, to take the shine off the gold market, which has tumbled to 556-euros today, from a record high of 640-euros three months ago.

    Whether the ECB can pull-off this magic trick, and prod Bernanke and his boss, Treasury chief Henry Paulson, into a series of Fed rate hikes to 2.75% this year remains to be seen. For now, the Fed is hoping that “jawboning” will do the job of containing the upward spiral in commodities, and support the dollar, giving it room to avoid raising interest rates as the economy sinks deeper into recession.

    The Fed’s hands appear to be tied by a weakening economy. The problem is if the central bank is bluffing about a tighter money policy to defend the dollar, it will open a Pandora’s Box to even greater instability and volatility in global markets.



    This article may be re-printed on other internet sites for public viewing, with links required to: http://www.sirchartsalot.com/newsletters.php





  • #2
    Re: EU Central Bank Calls Bernanke Bluff

    Much more robust and probing analysis coming from Gary Dorsch here than from Jack Crooks on this call. Dorsch makes Jack Crooks look like a mere technician.

    _____________________

    Dollar Showing Signs of Life
    by Jack Crooks

    The last few months have certainly left currency traders scratching their heads. And the dollar's path of consolidation, after touching an all-time low on March 17, is offering up far more questions than answers.

    But as I watch the dollar move higher, I like to think it really is strengthening. After all, it would be refreshing to see an extended rally that challenges the greenback's long-term bear market. And maybe I'm not alone on this thought ...

    Verbal Intervention: Bush, Paulson and Bernanke All Weighing in on the Dollar

    Earlier this week, President Bush got his two cents in about the need for a stronger dollar. Granted, these comments have little clout since they simply mirror Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson's agenda for a stronger dollar — an agenda that has mostly been backed by empty words rather than substantive action.

    Paulson, however, was just over in the Middle East doing his part in securing the current dollar pegs among Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar. The potential for de-pegging among these countries has been a talking point for dollar bears over the last year or two. The very fact that Hank is making some effort to prevent the bearish possibility of de-pegging is somewhat reassuring.


    The Treasury Secretary is also warming up to the potential for dollar intervention. While actual intervention is a lot easier said than done, simply talking about it may suffice.

    Perhaps most important to the dollar's battle over the last two weeks is the surprisingly strong tone coming from Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke. Two weeks ago he sent the dollar soaring with inflation comments that aimed directly at the consequences of a weak dollar.

    It's rare for a central banker to discuss foreign exchange rates at all. But Big Ben went as far as labeling a weak dollar as a major negative for the U.S.

    Talk about a change of heart! And Bernanke didn't stop there ...



    President George W. Bush, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, and Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson have ratcheted up the volume and tone of their inflation-fighting rhetoric in recent weeks.

    He came out firing again this past Tuesday. His late-day comments capped a strong dollar recovery and opened up the door for follow-through strength. Bernanke stated simply, as highlighted in many news headlines in the wake of his remarks, that he and his fellow policy makers will "strongly resist" a surge in inflation expectations.

    With Bernanke's comments in mind, I believe it's becoming increasingly clear where the Fed stands. Despite a struggling economy, and in the face of rapidly rising prices, it's a good bet that the Fed Funds rate won't be going lower than the current 2% any time soon. Stabilized interest rates would lend support to the greenback.

    There are other reasons to remain hopeful ...

    First, the yields on 10-year Treasuries jumped to the highest level all year.
    How is that relevant to the dollar? Well, rising Treasury yields suggest that investors are expecting inflation to remain a problem down the road. And that concern could inspire an eventual Fed Funds rate hike.



    Second, the dollar is showing signs of life. And not just the typical dead-cat bounce smack in the middle of a downtrend. This consolidation period has been surprisingly refreshing for the dollar bull in me.

    In fact ...

    It's Looking More and More Like the Buck Is Working Hard to Put in a Bottom ...

    A lot has happened in the last two weeks of trading. But pushing aside the aforementioned political and central bank rhetoric, I'd like to look only at price action.

    After a solid rally to finish up the month of May, the dollar hit the deck hard a week ago. What's important to note is that those losses also marked a major failure after testing recent highs. Normally that's a sign of weakness and begets further losses.



    But the dollar didn't give in, as you can see from my chart. Instead, it bounced back on Monday and Tuesday, more than erasing the disappointment of the two prior sessions. And then after a weak day of trading on Wednesday, the buck pushed to new highs.

    Certainly this isn't the type of rebound strength we're accustomed to seeing with the buck!

    Then again, I also noticed something not so encouraging: A bearish flag pattern that would imply an eventual breakdown to at least test its all-time lows is still in play. Take a look at this chart and you'll see what I mean ...





    As I see it, one of two things could come from this:

    Scenario #1: The dollar breaks convincingly out of the current period of consolidation, igniting a fresh wave of dollar-positive sentiment that invigorates the bulls and leaves the bears worrying that a legitimate bottom is in.

    Or ...

    Scenario #2: The dollar belly-flops, igniting a fresh wave of dollar-negative sentiment that reinvigorates the bears and leaves bulls fearing that a legitimate bottom is not in.

    Based on how the week finished up, I think scenario #1 is the more likely one right now.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: EU Central Bank Calls Bernanke Bluff

      And another endorsement of Gary Dorsch's thesis, from the Merck Hard Currency Fund. Methinks the "ayes" go to Dorsch on this call. Imminent monetary tightening from the US Fed is going to substantively be HOT AIR, and in the process, something larger will occur as well - The ECB will take the initiative on global rates away from the FED, and so quietly take the lead of global monetary policy away from the US.

      _________

      Merk Market Outlook: The Hawkish Illusion: Calling Bernanke’s Bluff
      By Joseph Brusuelas (Chief Economist - MERCK Hard Currency Fund)

      Over the past fortnight Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke has engaged in “open mouth operations” to shape market expectations regarding future monetary policy out of the US Federal Reserve. Mr. Bernanke rhetorically intervened in the global currency markets to prop up a beleaguered dollar, explicitly expressed unease over the current course of inflation and signaled that the Fed would not tolerate a breakout of inflation expectations. Not bad, for a Fed Chairman fighting multiple crisis on multiple fronts.

      The concerns over inflation expectations expressed by Mr. Bernanke and the more intense hawkishness expressed by Dallas Fed President Richard Fisher and Richmond Fed President Jeffrey Lacker are well founded. Public expectations over short-term inflation have soared. According to the University of Michigan the public expects that over the next year inflation will increase 5.5% and the Conference Board's twelve-month gauge suggest a 7.7% rise in the year ahead. Even market sentiment, which has lagged public sentiment, has changed.




      The market, caught off guard by the rapid change in expectations and surprised by the speed and sustained switch in rhetoric out of the Fed, changed its expectations of rate hikes in confused haste. Using federal funds futures rates as a metric for measuring changing market sentiment traders now expect that the Fed will hike rates by 50bps before the end of the year with a 37.1% probability of 75bps in hikes by the end of the year.

      Under normal circumstances, I would welcome a return of the hawkish instincts that underlie the foundation of Mr. Bernanke's hallmark academic work on inflation targeting. Such a hawkish turn would compliment my own theoretical orientation and normative preferences regarding appropriate monetary policy and the necessity of a single focus on price stability.
      Such a potential move by the central bank is in line with the systematic case I have been making over the past several months regarding the future impact on inflation expectations caused by the rise in energy and commodity prices. The entire efficacy of contemporary Fed policy is hinged on a stable set of expectations and the slow and steady upward movement in those expectations over the past few months has stimulated the gravest crises faced by the Fed in many years.

      While, a case can be made that there is little threat to macroeconomic stability from inflation until wage demands begin to work their way through the system, I do not concur. By the time that unit labor costs begin to rise and a newly minted Congress bestows upon labor newfound power, it will be to late. The pain that would be necessary to inflict on the public to combat a such a breakout of wage-push inflation is way beyond what our current political system and the likely leftward composition of the next Congress will be willing to stomach.

      That being said, once one takes a step back and looks at the recent statements of Mr. Bernanke in the proper context, these are good reasons to be more than a bit skeptical of the recent hawkishness out of the Fed chair. Let me elaborate. Given the continued stress in financial markets, an economy moving sideways and a consumer that remains under duress we are highly suspect of the recent claims by the Fed chair that rate hikes are imminent. Moreover a simple observation of the movement in markets is quite instructive of the real problem the Fed currently faces.

      Perhaps, other than the clear change in the federal funds futures market, the most startling shift has occurred is in fixed income space, where curve steepening trades have been rapidly unwound. The spread between 2yr and 10yr yields has closed quite quickly. This has put an unexpected bout of pressure on financial firms, who rely on the ability to borrow short and lend long and thought that they had reached a short-term point of stability. Why have financials continued to tank? In addition to the lingering uncertainty over the condition of their books, it is due to the newfound hawkishness on the part of Mr. Bernanke. Why is this so problematic?

      Unless, Mr. Bernanke is willing to undo much of the patchwork that his innovative and unorthodox approach to shoring up the financial system over the past several months has accomplished, we do not see him urging his colleagues to move quite quickly on rates,
      Second, we are approaching what will be a very close and contentious Presidential election in the United States.

      After doing a bit of research, I was able to observe that with the exception of Paul Volker's rate increase ahead of the Reagan-Carter match in 1980 and Alan Greenspan's hike before the 1992 election between Clinton and Bush the elder, Fed chairman have been quite careful to steer clear of Presidential elections. It would be nice to believe that the central bank independence has been thoroughly absorbed by our monetary officials and that price stability would outweigh political considerations. But it does strike me as quite difficult to believe that Mr. Bernanke would hike rates, not once, but twice according to current market expectations, in advance of the election.

      This would surely facilitate the election of a candidate that would summarily reject Bernanke's reappointment early in the first term the new President.

      The net effect of all of the sound and fury that the market has experienced over the past few days, will in all probability, be to set up a confrontation down the road between the market and the Fed. My own ex-ante GDP forecast strongly suggests that after two consecutive quarters of sub 2.0% growth through the middle of 2008, that output will fall back towards zero to conclude the year. I think that the Fed is counting on both output and resource utilization (unemployment) easing later this year to provide cover for their continued dovish policy.
      In fact, Fed Vice-Chair Donald Kohn, who since the crisis began last August, has been something of a useful barometer for those of use who attempt to derive what the Fed will do next.

      Mr. Kohn in his most recent statement made the case that the proper policy path for the Fed may be to tolerate higher inflation and higher unemployment in fact of a commodity shock of the sort that we are facing today. This fact that it was made at a Boston Fed conference discussing the trade off between unemployment and inflation, better known as the “Phillips Curve,” is no accident. What all of this tells this economist is that the Fed is going to continue to tolerate inflation, attempt to manage inflation expectations and quite simply buy time for the financial system to repair itself. If the Fed truly wanted to get serious about inflation and signal the start of a rate hiking cycle, it would begin to reduce the growth of the money base, set a date for the end of the “temporary auction facility” and raise rates at the next meeting. But it will not.

      Unfortunately, the unintended consequence of this very delicate balancing act is that a potent dénouement is forming over the horizon in which the market will move to demand that the Fed move to increase rates, well before it is ready to do so. With the very credible signals out of the European Central Bank that rates hikes are just around the corner, with each passing day, the Fed finds itself slowly but surely painted into policy path that upon further review is not of its choosing. The inability or unwillingness to act on the part of the Fed will have a deleterious impact on the dollar and with it a reduction in the living standard of individual Americans.

      Joseph Brusuelas - Chief Economist - Merk Investments

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: EU Central Bank Calls Bernanke Bluff

        Nice work, Luke.
        Jim 69 y/o

        "...Texans...the lowest form of white man there is." Robert Duvall, as Al Sieber, in "Geronimo." (see "Location" for examples.)

        Dedicated to the idea that all people deserve a chance for a healthy productive life. B&M Gates Fdn.

        Good judgement comes from experience; experience comes from bad judgement. Unknown.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: EU Central Bank Calls Bernanke Bluff

          Thanks Jim, but I only collected three articles all discussing the probability that a Fed inspired turn in the dollar may be real. Not exactly strenuous work on my part. Gary Dorsch is excellent - very workmanlike and methodical summaries of breaking market news in his posts. There's not much he misses.

          Here's an interesting snippet by Tom Szabo, an associate of Antal Fekete, on why there is an increasing likelihood of a global popular backlash against commodities speculation - quite obviously as it's causing the beginnings of starvation and becoming a burning issue. He notes that if governments get serious to legislate curbs on speculation in the commodities markets, the beneficiaries in fact are gold and silver, as precious metals are the sole commodities which are "socially acceptable" to hoard and have no direct harmful effect upon the basic commodities causing hardship to the world's most vulnerable.

          What he's pointing out is counterintuitive - a lot of people here feel that the best and most direct play on this runaway commodities bull market is OIL, because this is the most critical resource of all. Concomitantly, these people believe that the prime candidates for central bank manipulation or legislation must be gold and silver. However what Szabo points out is that the critical problems emerging with food, and fuel, are in fact far more likely to bear the brunt of globally legislated curbs, and that if this happens, in an environment of rampant, out of control inflation emerging globally, the "safety valve" will be precisely the precious metals.

          He concludes that as the entire commodities complex comes under increasing scrutiny, (e.g. government moving to further tax "big oil" plus imposition of draconian caps on all forms of commodities speculation and even ownership), the pressure will build massively worldwide to locate substitutes for the world's money to protect itself from worsening inflaiton. As we begin to observe increasing legislated controls on commodities, this will be the cue for all the money until now overwhelmingly employed in buying commodities as financial hedges to migrate to it's natural destination for that purpose - gold (and silver) which then accrue a sizeable new bid. It's not much further extrapolation from there to see how this could cause them to begin another massive leg up. Politicization of commodities speculation can easily result in being very bullish for the PM'S.

          QUOTE:
          TODAY IN SILVER | Archives

          JUNE 13 2008 4:05PM - The dollar has fought and conquered the 74 level resistance as oil continues to loiter near its record, creating an interesting situation where both are showing strength while au/ag remain on the defensive. One possible way for this to resolve after some requisite volatility is for oil and the dollar to weaken in unison as au/ag take center stage. Along these lines, here is what I said in response to someone who recently dismissed gold because it is "just money". The investment value of gold is that it is mispriced as money, not that it is money itself. To the extent there is recognition of the negative social consequences to most of the commodity "investing" that is currently taking place, this will invite a major popular backlash.

          Simply put, the commodity market is broken when higher prices resulting from long speculation (hoarding) cannot encourage additional production as a result of NATURAL CONSTRAINTS IN SUPPLY.

          When this happens, the futures markets are not only unnecessary, they are actually counterproductive. The direct beneficiary is gold (and silver) because bullion hoarding is more socially acceptable and may represent one of the few outlets for commodity exposure in a coming investment crackdown. Those presently hedging dollar exposure with oil or allocating to a broad commodity index for portfolio optimization would be forced into gold and silver, which is where they should be in the first place. In fact, the main historic role of gold and silver are to protest fiscal policy, and only the greed and hubris of Wall Street have permitted a substitution of vital food and energy for that purpose.

          http://www.silveraxis.com/





          Comment


          • #6
            Re: EU Central Bank Calls Bernanke Bluff

            Scanned quickly though all of that Luke, the upshot is the FED is trying to talk tough. Trouble is EVERYONE in the room knows its BULL!

            ECB & BOE not much better, a moment will come when they have to face the music.........that China will be playing!

            Mike

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: EU Central Bank Calls Bernanke Bluff

              Originally posted by Mega View Post
              Scanned quickly though all of that Luke, the upshot is the FED is trying to talk tough. Trouble is EVERYONE in the room knows its BULL!

              ECB & BOE not much better, a moment will come when they have to face the music.........that China will be playing!

              Mike
              The "strength" in the US$ looks pretty anaemic so far looking at the chart in Crooks commentary:



              Clearly the food and fuel price inflation situation has motivated [frightened?] all of the world's central bankers into shifting their emphasis to "inflation fighting" And this truly is ALL the world's central bankers, including the Chinese. The only exception is the ECB as Trichet never waivered from his Bundesbankesque anti-inflation stance.

              I've heard several respected commentators this past week note the increasing spread between different Euro denominated sovereign bonds (Italy vs Germany for example) as in indication of stress in the Euro currency system. If the Euro comes under pressure, which currency is likely to benefit?. Who knows, maybe the Dollar will have a better year than most of us think it deserves...

              Comment

              Working...
              X