The Doomsday Clock:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doomsday_Clock
Would it be a good idea to see it updated and brought into the 21st century?
While I think the odds of a nuclear weapon being used in my lifetime are quite possibly higher now and the foreseeable future than at any time in my 40+ years alive I'm actually far more optomistic that it will NOT represent a "Day After" or "Threads" scenario of massive use.
I would posit that any nuclear weapons used would quite possibly be rather limited in number and location.
Would folks benefit from having an economic/financial doomsday clock?
Would that not be more relevant to most folks and possibly be a leading indicator for the nuclear doomsday clock?
Or are we already only 2 minutes to economic/financial doomsday midnight negating it's usefulness as a warning indicator?
It could so easily be rebranded digital....add in seconds....that way the rocket scientists that fiddle with it far more foten and appear to be making cogent analysis and changes without really necessarily changing anything
Like 1 minute and 17 seconds sounds more scientific than a blunt 3 minutes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doomsday_Clock
Would it be a good idea to see it updated and brought into the 21st century?
While I think the odds of a nuclear weapon being used in my lifetime are quite possibly higher now and the foreseeable future than at any time in my 40+ years alive I'm actually far more optomistic that it will NOT represent a "Day After" or "Threads" scenario of massive use.
I would posit that any nuclear weapons used would quite possibly be rather limited in number and location.
Would folks benefit from having an economic/financial doomsday clock?
Would that not be more relevant to most folks and possibly be a leading indicator for the nuclear doomsday clock?
Or are we already only 2 minutes to economic/financial doomsday midnight negating it's usefulness as a warning indicator?
It could so easily be rebranded digital....add in seconds....that way the rocket scientists that fiddle with it far more foten and appear to be making cogent analysis and changes without really necessarily changing anything
Like 1 minute and 17 seconds sounds more scientific than a blunt 3 minutes.
Comment