Kent State Killings Sparked by FBI Provacateur show FBI documents

[Shakespear]

Re: Kent State Killings Sparked by FBI Provacateur show FBI documents

I have a simple question : "Why is Washington Times finding this so important NOW ?"

Yes, I know, because the news people never stop in trying to discover the Truth. But ....

So I checked on the paper as I recalled reading that that Democracy Loving Rev. Moon had something to do with it. Here is the background on the paper,

http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1569

So I agree, send this story to the cellar as it seems to me to be "contaminated", Rant and Rave a good place. :confused:

Look the part on Kent State photo in this link

http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/farid/re...italtampering/

[SamAdams]

Re: Kent State Killings Sparked by FBI Provacateur show FBI documents

Maybe because it's the 40th anniversary?

I have a simple question : "Why is Washington Times finding this so important NOW ?"

[Serge_Tomiko]

Re: Kent State Killings Sparked by FBI Provacateur show FBI documents

So I checked on the paper as I recalled reading that that Democracy Loving Rev. Moon had something to do with it. Here is the background on the paper,

And most newspapers are owned by Jews who do remarkable things like simultaneously call for endless immigration to the United States from third world countries yet simultaneously propagandize in favor of their ethnocentric homeland.

So who is worse? Jews or Rev. Moon?

[flintlock]

Re: Kent State Killings Sparked by FBI Provacateur show FBI documents

1) SOP to keep clandestine operations clandestine. I see nothing sinister with that. Undercover agents are involved in other type incidents all the time and they are usually not outed.

2) This was a time of communist paranoia. Plus it is a good idea to keep tabs on any potential anti-government movement. Not that I believe the anti war movement was anti-government. But some saw it that way, especially those in power.

3) Don't know about that one.

4) If I'm reading it correctly, the tests merely showed he had discharged his weapon, not when or where. He could have gone to the range and not cleaned his pistol after. Do we have any reason to suspect he fired at Kent State?

The FBI routinely keeps tabs on demonstrations. Its their job. How else would they learn which are threats and which are not? Even innocent organizations get investigated. That's the nature of the business. They can't just take it at face value which are harmless. Keep in mind the times. Back then any resistance to "The Powers That Be" was considered suspicious and potentially seditious. That was the beginning of the era where we no longer trust the government. Something we just take for granted today.