Tweet
Last April, a Danish scientist named Dr. Niels Harrit published a A peer-reviewed paper reported that a little known high-tech explosive called nano-thermite was found throughout the World Trade Center dust. He was criticized for his sample collection, analysis methods, and the conclusion. Yet here is what the true experts in this fields have to say about this paper:
"...provides indisputable evidence that a highly engineered explosive called nano-thermite was found in the dust of all three buildings that came down on 9/11 2001 in New York city.
This advanced explosive incorporating nanotechnology is only available to sophisticated military labs."
This statement is from non-other than the British Institute of Nanotechnology - a leading organization of nanotechnology in Europe. According to its own website:
"Between 2001 and 2003, as part of the formulation of a nanotechnology strategy for the UK , the then DTI approached IoN to organise fact finding Missions to key nanotechnology locations"..."From 2002 – 2007, IoN was the lead partner in Nanoforum, www.nanoforum.org ‘the European Nanotechnology Gateway', an important dissemination project aimed at raising the levels of nanotechnology knowledge across EU Member States".
This is their advisory group.
Their endorsement of Dr. Harrit's finding lend him huge credibility, and the significance is unimaginable.
Since the publishing of this paper, main stream media has gradually changed their attitude towards the so-call "9/11 Conspiracy Theorist". The following are a few examples:
1. ON NOVEMBER 27, 2009, CBC(Canadian Brocasting Corporation) aired a documentary "The Unofficial Story" on its popular "Fifth Estate" program, exploring the alternative 9/11 viewd with a balanced and unbiased coverage.
http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/2009-2010/the_unofficial_story/
2. TruTV's "Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura" has an episode about 9/11. I find Mr. Ventura is an honest, straight-talking former politician, intelligent person. He might be an outliner on the US political scene, but he certainly has his influence.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Uw5B...eature=related
3. Heise Online (a German publishing house) carried an interview with German Federal Judge Dieter Deiseroth (judge of the Federal Administrative Court and an expert on international law, administrative and constitutional law). Here is what he said about 9/11:
Original,and google translation:
"Since 11 September, as reported in a loop again and again, Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda were responsible for the attacks. Interestingly, Osama bin Laden is still wanted by the FBI not because of 9 / 11. Why? Because we, we present statements from officials of the FBI, has against him in terms of 9 / 11 no evidence in court. And yet, even though law enforcement has the supreme authority of the United States does not have such evidence in court against OBL, you have started the war, first in Afghanistan, then against Iraq, possibly soon in Pakistan."
"When you make the claim that bin Laden was responsible for the terrorist from 9 / 11, then you're in the burden of proof. One would certainly strive earnestly for his extradition and he will have to face before an independent court."
"It is alleged that the Bush administration's alleged or actual evidence of their official 9/11-Version, has been as I said, have never been audited by an independent court. If someone is with the official version of a "Surprise Conspiracy" (Osama bin Laden and the Al Qaeda network controlled assassin deals) will find that you are dealing with a lot of unproven allegations, some more than others plausible. Why are there because of 9 / 11 is no arrest warrant for Osama bin Laden? It should therefore be promptly reviewed in each case strictly on the basis of law, whether the official conspiracy version, as they will spend 8 years to the public as truth, is also in fact the truth."
More details: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...t=va&aid=17624
At this stage, anyone still think the "Truthers" are a bunch of nutcase "Conspiracy Theorist", will you please open your eyes and mind, and rethink?
"...provides indisputable evidence that a highly engineered explosive called nano-thermite was found in the dust of all three buildings that came down on 9/11 2001 in New York city.
This advanced explosive incorporating nanotechnology is only available to sophisticated military labs."
This statement is from non-other than the British Institute of Nanotechnology - a leading organization of nanotechnology in Europe. According to its own website:
"Between 2001 and 2003, as part of the formulation of a nanotechnology strategy for the UK , the then DTI approached IoN to organise fact finding Missions to key nanotechnology locations"..."From 2002 – 2007, IoN was the lead partner in Nanoforum, www.nanoforum.org ‘the European Nanotechnology Gateway', an important dissemination project aimed at raising the levels of nanotechnology knowledge across EU Member States".
This is their advisory group.
Their endorsement of Dr. Harrit's finding lend him huge credibility, and the significance is unimaginable.
Since the publishing of this paper, main stream media has gradually changed their attitude towards the so-call "9/11 Conspiracy Theorist". The following are a few examples:
1. ON NOVEMBER 27, 2009, CBC(Canadian Brocasting Corporation) aired a documentary "The Unofficial Story" on its popular "Fifth Estate" program, exploring the alternative 9/11 viewd with a balanced and unbiased coverage.
http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/2009-2010/the_unofficial_story/
2. TruTV's "Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura" has an episode about 9/11. I find Mr. Ventura is an honest, straight-talking former politician, intelligent person. He might be an outliner on the US political scene, but he certainly has his influence.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Uw5B...eature=related
3. Heise Online (a German publishing house) carried an interview with German Federal Judge Dieter Deiseroth (judge of the Federal Administrative Court and an expert on international law, administrative and constitutional law). Here is what he said about 9/11:
Original,and google translation:
"Since 11 September, as reported in a loop again and again, Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda were responsible for the attacks. Interestingly, Osama bin Laden is still wanted by the FBI not because of 9 / 11. Why? Because we, we present statements from officials of the FBI, has against him in terms of 9 / 11 no evidence in court. And yet, even though law enforcement has the supreme authority of the United States does not have such evidence in court against OBL, you have started the war, first in Afghanistan, then against Iraq, possibly soon in Pakistan."
"When you make the claim that bin Laden was responsible for the terrorist from 9 / 11, then you're in the burden of proof. One would certainly strive earnestly for his extradition and he will have to face before an independent court."
"It is alleged that the Bush administration's alleged or actual evidence of their official 9/11-Version, has been as I said, have never been audited by an independent court. If someone is with the official version of a "Surprise Conspiracy" (Osama bin Laden and the Al Qaeda network controlled assassin deals) will find that you are dealing with a lot of unproven allegations, some more than others plausible. Why are there because of 9 / 11 is no arrest warrant for Osama bin Laden? It should therefore be promptly reviewed in each case strictly on the basis of law, whether the official conspiracy version, as they will spend 8 years to the public as truth, is also in fact the truth."
More details: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...t=va&aid=17624
At this stage, anyone still think the "Truthers" are a bunch of nutcase "Conspiracy Theorist", will you please open your eyes and mind, and rethink?
Comment