Re: Got Fascism? : Obama Advisor Promotes 'Cognitive Infiltration'
Here is what some of the bloggers said in reponse to the article and link you posted.
1. "Except for the Orwellian NewSpeak, nothing really new here, is there?"
2. "Yes, what Mariann says, as usual. Nothing really new here. Same old Same old. Except maybe now with zanier fonts and better music."
3. "Nothing new,for sure"
4. "Of course, if any of you'd like to actually READ the whole article being discussed before decrying it in your comments, you'll realize that it's being grossly mischaracterized here.
"what Sunstein is proposing is government infiltration of groups opposing prevailing policy"??!? No. Nowhere in the paper does it say anything about groups opposing prevailing policy; this is simply a paranoid extrapolation you've made yourself.
Seriously people, go read it. Estrin is trying to portray it as some kind of call-to-arms for the unleashing of spies onto the internet, when it's actually a fairly sedate examination of various responses to both extremist thought groups and conspiracy theorists.
Also, a little side point, it's an academic journal, okay? When they use phrases like "cognitive diversity" they're citing specific technical terminology within their field - so when you stick your own little bunny ears around it as if to suggest that it's an invented euphemism for something more sinister, that's just weak. (That goes too for the guy at the top who called it 'Newspeak')"
So, Jteb do the bloggers help you understand? Read #4 carefully
Cindy
Originally posted by jtabeb
View Post
1. "Except for the Orwellian NewSpeak, nothing really new here, is there?"
2. "Yes, what Mariann says, as usual. Nothing really new here. Same old Same old. Except maybe now with zanier fonts and better music."
3. "Nothing new,for sure"
4. "Of course, if any of you'd like to actually READ the whole article being discussed before decrying it in your comments, you'll realize that it's being grossly mischaracterized here.
"what Sunstein is proposing is government infiltration of groups opposing prevailing policy"??!? No. Nowhere in the paper does it say anything about groups opposing prevailing policy; this is simply a paranoid extrapolation you've made yourself.
Seriously people, go read it. Estrin is trying to portray it as some kind of call-to-arms for the unleashing of spies onto the internet, when it's actually a fairly sedate examination of various responses to both extremist thought groups and conspiracy theorists.
Also, a little side point, it's an academic journal, okay? When they use phrases like "cognitive diversity" they're citing specific technical terminology within their field - so when you stick your own little bunny ears around it as if to suggest that it's an invented euphemism for something more sinister, that's just weak. (That goes too for the guy at the top who called it 'Newspeak')"
So, Jteb do the bloggers help you understand? Read #4 carefully
Cindy
Comment