Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Socialism, Health Care and the American economy

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Socialism, Health Care and the American economy

    The third rail buzzword of Socialism is being applied to the idea of Health Care reform.

    It is a charged word - whether because of 50 years of Cold War in which the United States emerged victorious, or because of visions of Granny dying for lack of a procedure otherwise available via Medicare, or even the thought of having to wait in line for a hospital or doctor visit.

    Yet the most amusing, yet pathetic aspect of this situation is that socialism is already upon us.

    First, let's look at some definitions of socialism:

    1) http://www.thefreedictionary.com/socialism


    so·cial·ism
























    (ssh-lzm)

    n. 1. Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy.

    2) http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=socialism

    Noun
    • S: (n) socialism (a political theory advocating state ownership of industry)
    • S: (n) socialism, socialist economy (an economic system based on state ownership of capital)

    It seems clear from these definitions that socialism is the state or government ownership of industry, capital, and/or the means of producing and distributing goods.

    The ownership can be collectively or via a centralized government that plans or controls the economy.

    Well, last I looked, the US government now owns:

    1) a big chunk of the American auto industry: Ford and Chrysler

    http://www.nlpc.org/stories/2009/05/...-union-gets-hu

    2) a big chunk of the banking industry: Citibank as well as large stakes in numerous other financial firms

    http://seekingalpha.com/article/1075...-a-lot-anymore

    3) a big chunk of the insurance industry: AIG as well as large cash infusions via Fed programs to a number of other insurance companies who are now banks

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122156561931242905.html (takeover 9/2008)

    http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv...4A92FM20081110 ("double down" on original $85B to $150B)

    http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/...cord-loss.html (4th bailout. I'm tired of posting AIG bailouts so skipped #3 and subsequent ones)

    4) a big equity stake in General Electric - whatever $140,000,000,000 bought you in November 2008

    http://seekingalpha.com/article/1059...e-point-of-aaa

    5) almost all of the mortgage industry: Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac etc

    http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/...cord-loss.html

    6) and via the above, and once foreclosures wind through, a big chunk of American residential property

    http://www.chrismartenson.com/blog/f...ued-2009/28343

    7) Even amongst the population, the government is already directly supporting over 1 in 9 Americans via food stamps. Or ration books by another outdated term

    http://www.reuters.com/article/domes...55270Y20090603

    Even if we ignore the above, the ongoing reality is that the United States federal government and its quasi public/quasi private bed partner, the Federal Reserve, is in the ongoing process of buying a large part of America.

    Is Socialism via government purchase so much different than Socialism via sovereign decree?

    And why is socialism for bankers, insurance executives, automobile companies, banks, mortgage brokers, and General Electric acceptable when socialism for health care is not?

    Why is socialism for food support for the poor acceptable but health care for everyone not?

    Just wondering...

  • #2
    Re: Socialism, Health Care and the American economy

    Evil will always triumph, because good is dumb.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Socialism, Health Care and the American economy

      Originally posted by c1ue View Post
      T
      ...
      Yet the most amusing, yet pathetic aspect of this situation is that socialism is already upon us.
      Not really, since socialism assumes government ownership and control. But I see only the first part, so there are better words to describe existing arrangement.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Socialism, Health Care and the American economy

        But VIT, the real question isn't whether the government controls everything.

        It is whether it is February 1917 or October 1917.

        After all, the Communists didn't control everything immediately...

        Secondly the Soviet Union isn't the only example. What about the many European nations which are 'socialist'? Do these governments control everything?

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Socialism, Health Care and the American economy

          Answers to the healthcare question on death panels will soon be answered....

          Less than three months after resigning as governor of Alaska, Sarah Palin, the onetime vice presidential candidate, has completed her memoir.

          HarperCollins Publishers, which signed a multi-million dollar deal with Ms. Palin in May, said in a statement on Tuesday that it had moved up the publication date from the spring of 2010 to Nov. 17 of this year.

          The book will be titled “Going Rogue: An American Life”; the publisher has announced a first-print run of 1.5 million copies.


          Ms. Palin worked with a collaborator, Lynn Vincent, the editor of World, an evangelical magazine.

          Palin, regarding the book, said, “There’s wasn’t as much there as you’d think, you know”.

          Comment

          Working...
          X