Tweet
Originally posted by EJ
Originally posted by EJ's inflationary outcome.}
Originally posted by EJ's deflationary outcome
-
Perhaps one of these scenarios will prevail.
EJ did not say either of these would happen in his post # 15 in the thread Saving, Asset-Price Inflation, and Debt-Induced Deflation http://www.itulip.com/forums/showthread.php?t=891 He offered them as possible extremes. In voting, the results would be more meaningful to vote in terms of the likelihood of things economic going more one way than the other, that is to say don't think either extreme will necessarily be reached in the entirety of EJ's imaginings.28EJ's inflationary outcome.53.57%15EJ's deflationary outcome.17.86%5Neither.28.57%8Last edited by Jim Nickerson; February 06, 2007, 11:08 AM. Reason: I wish to delete the post, because it is not giving me the "polls tool."Jim 69 y/o
"...Texans...the lowest form of white man there is." Robert Duvall, as Al Sieber, in "Geronimo." (see "Location" for examples.)
Dedicated to the idea that all people deserve a chance for a healthy productive life. B&M Gates Fdn.
Good judgement comes from experience; experience comes from bad judgement. Unknown. -
Re: EJ's Rip Van Winkle awakening in 2012.
Take the prices from the former and the income from the latter and THAT seems about right. (yes seriously) My vote is neither (or both, depending on how you look at it).
Stagnant or falling wages that do not keep up with even REPORTED inflation, let alone a more accurate of inflation, combined with all goods price inflation and (select, aka commodity) asset inflation. Sounds ******* lovely.
People have it wrong when it comes to commodities. James Dines has it exactly correct when he says, and I am paraphrasing "once awakened, dis-trust of a currency eventually becomes a deafening roar". It may be about supply and demand now, but it sure won't be later. (I think it is not, it is all about not properly accounting for the environmental, military, and the replacement costs of critical commodities, like energy).Last edited by jtabeb; May 28, 2011, 11:18 AM. -
Re: EJ's Rip Van Winkle awakening in 2012.
i voted inflationary as i think that will be closer to the picture, though i don't think it will all unfold by the end of next year. otoh, i agree with you, jtabeb, that incomes will look worse than in the pure inflationary scenario.Originally posted by jtabeb View Post
Comment
-
Re: EJ's Rip Van Winkle awakening in 2012.
You guys do realize that Nickerson posted this poll in 2007?Comment
-
Re: EJ's Rip Van Winkle awakening in 2012.
no, i'm embarrassed to say that i all i saw was that jtabeb had just posted to the thread. so now it is almost 5 years later. did we have inflation or deflation? yes, we did.Originally posted by babbittd View PostComment
-
Re: EJ's Rip Van Winkle awakening in 2012.
it just popped to the top of the board and thought that it would be worthwhile to comment.Comment
-
Re: EJ's Rip Van Winkle awakening in 2012.
EU solvency issues explode. Sets off global financial crisis. Business failures, high unemployment. Collapse in velocity. Bernanke prints, but banks don't lend, because who can pay back? Prices drop as everybody is willing to make less profit and live on less. Big Deflation.
Or maybe everything will just work out, and hope triumphs.raja
Boycott Big Banks • Vote Out IncumbentsComment
-
Re: EJ's Rip Van Winkle awakening in 2012.
Well now it's 2011 0808 and we know that by the time 2012 gets here there will have been another round of some kind of indeflationary $#!+...Finster
...Comment
-
Re: EJ's Rip Van Winkle awakening in 2012.
Well chalk up another one for EJ ... the collpase of the debt pyramid is under way ...Finster
...Comment
-
Re: EJ's Rip Van Winkle awakening in 2012.
what do you mean finster? I don't see any new signs of collapse. Both international and domestic bond markets are down today, but I assume that is normal
risk on / risk off sector rotation. corp/treas ratios seem to be holding up too.
When you spin the unemployment numbers into employment numbers, they seem to always contradict the unemployment numbers.
June report I thought was good.
July report I think is bad. There are actually less people working this month than last. 100,000 new full time jobs, but 200,000 less part time jobs.
Weekly wages about the same.
And the rate of new jobs increase y-o-y is slowing too.Comment
-
Re: EJ's Rip Van Winkle awakening in 2012.
Bottom line. None of the gloom and doom forecasts from Rubini, Shiff, etc. happened. Certainly nothing that I thought would go down happened. EJ on the whole has hit it exactly down the middle. Bravo EJ!Originally posted by charliebrown View PostComment
-
Re: EJ's Rip Van Winkle awakening in 2012.
Yeah, I wasn't referring to very recent events ... the context was my last post in August 2011, and plenty has gone under the bridge since, China slowing, the ongoing euro fiasco, just to cite some of the headlines. Globaleconomicollaps probably puts it better ...Originally posted by charliebrown View PostFinster
...Comment
Comment