http://www.theonion.com/content/vide...artment_issues
If the above recall of US cash seems outrageous and over-the-top, check out this item from Mike Shedlock wherein he discusses a contemplation by HARVARD Professor Mankiw on yanking 10% of US currency by a lottery:
Good to know, Harvard is teaching all those potential perps about clever schemes.
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogsp...policy-of.html
So, maybe time to forget about stability and norms, and begin to contemplate the wacky, crazy, confiscatory things Government and their Elites do when things get desperate and fall apart. It ain't bizness as usual; a clever scheme could be coming to a neighborhood near you.
If the above recall of US cash seems outrageous and over-the-top, check out this item from Mike Shedlock wherein he discusses a contemplation by HARVARD Professor Mankiw on yanking 10% of US currency by a lottery:
At one of my recent Harvard seminars, a graduate student proposed a clever scheme to [make holding money less attractive].
Imagine that the Fed were to announce that, a year from today, it would pick a digit from zero to 9 out of a hat. All currency with a serial number ending in that digit would no longer be legal tender. Suddenly, the expected return to holding currency would become negative 10 percent.
That move would free the Fed to cut interest rates below zero. People would be delighted to lend money at negative 3 percent, since losing 3 percent is better than losing 10.
Of course, some people might decide that at those rates, they would rather spend the money — for example, by buying a new car. But because expanding aggregate demand is precisely the goal of the interest rate cut, such an incentive isn’t a flaw — it’s a benefit.
Imagine that the Fed were to announce that, a year from today, it would pick a digit from zero to 9 out of a hat. All currency with a serial number ending in that digit would no longer be legal tender. Suddenly, the expected return to holding currency would become negative 10 percent.
That move would free the Fed to cut interest rates below zero. People would be delighted to lend money at negative 3 percent, since losing 3 percent is better than losing 10.
Of course, some people might decide that at those rates, they would rather spend the money — for example, by buying a new car. But because expanding aggregate demand is precisely the goal of the interest rate cut, such an incentive isn’t a flaw — it’s a benefit.
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogsp...policy-of.html
So, maybe time to forget about stability and norms, and begin to contemplate the wacky, crazy, confiscatory things Government and their Elites do when things get desperate and fall apart. It ain't bizness as usual; a clever scheme could be coming to a neighborhood near you.
Comment