Combine short squeezing with conflict of interest and add cheap government money.
http://www.bearishnews.com/post/349
Excerpt
The basic gameplan for a investment bank bank like Goldman might look something like this:
http://www.bearishnews.com/post/349
Excerpt
The basic gameplan for a investment bank bank like Goldman might look something like this:
- Borrow dirt-cheap money from the Fed
- Loan that money to risky commercial real-estate companies by underwriting juicy offerings (10.35% for the Simon debt, equity was at $31.50, an ~8% discount to current price).
- Collect fees from client(s), plus interest from the spread on the debt. If there’s not enough demand for the stock, keep it yourself, then proceed to steps 4 and 5.
- Research dept adds stock to Conviction Buy List
- If GS traders and Quant-funds were to brutally squeeze the stock higher, that would be icing on the cake for the whole deal, hypothetically. What’s to stand in the way? Dennis Gartman and a few dozen retail investors?
The Complaint also alleges that Goldman Sachs published exaggerated or unwarranted research and failed to maintain appropriate supervision over its research and investment banking operations.
Goldman Sachs “aligned” its research, equities, and investment banking divisions to work collaboratively in order to fully leverage its limited research resources.
Goldman Sachs failed to establish and maintain adequate policies, systems, and procedures reasonably designed to ensure the objectivity of its published research.
At this point, I’d like to clarify that my suspicions are just that. I have no proof of any wrongdoing, and don’t claim to. But this looks suspicious.
Goldman Sachs “aligned” its research, equities, and investment banking divisions to work collaboratively in order to fully leverage its limited research resources.
Goldman Sachs failed to establish and maintain adequate policies, systems, and procedures reasonably designed to ensure the objectivity of its published research.
Comment