Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A Marriage Made in Hell...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • A Marriage Made in Hell...

    The reason I think a Fannie + Freddie merger is a non-starter is because the Dems would then have one less multi-million dollar per year CEO position to dole out to one of the Party faithful...:rolleyes:
    Fannie, Freddie Face Pressure to Revamp as U.S. Aid Increases

    April 15 (Bloomberg) -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are under pressure from lawmakers to revamp their operations as the mortgage-finance companies tap more government money to survive.
    Among the options under discussion are combining the companies, breaking them up or reshaping their missions...

    ...Executives at Washington-based Fannie have discussed internally the possibility of taking over McLean, Virginia-based Freddie’s operations, according to people familiar with the matter...

    ...“There will be a massive re-write of the GSEs into some new structure,” though probably not this year, Petrou said...

    ...A merger would be the quickest way for regulators to cut costs by reducing Fannie and Freddie’s combined 11,000-person workforce, shedding underperforming mortgage assets and reducing the bureaucracy of running two companies with identical functions...

    ...“It’s got to happen; we’re not going to put them back the way they were,” Whalen said of a merger. “The only way we’re going to be able to manage them is if we squeeze every last ounce of savings out of the administrative side and just focus on trying to keep the loss number under control.”...





  • #2
    Re: A Marriage Made in Hell...

    Originally posted by GRG55 View Post
    The reason I think a Fannie + Freddie merger is a non-starter is because the Dems would then have one less multi-million dollar per year CEO position to dole out to one of the Party faithful...:rolleyes:
    Fannie, Freddie Face Pressure to Revamp as U.S. Aid Increases

    April 15 (Bloomberg) -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are under pressure from lawmakers to revamp their operations as the mortgage-finance companies tap more government money to survive.
    Among the options under discussion are combining the companies, breaking them up or reshaping their missions...


    But it sure won't stop them from feeding at the public trough...:p
    Fannie Mae to Tap $19 Billion in Treasury Capital

    May 8 (Bloomberg) -- Fannie Mae, operating under a federal conservatorship, asked the U.S. Treasury for a $19 billion capital investment and raised the possibility that its long-term survival may be dependent on continued government funding.

    Fannie Mae, which took $15.2 billion in aid on March 31, cited the “unprecedented” housing market slump and government- mandated programs that are creating “conflicts in strategic and day-to-day decision making,” according to company filings today with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

    The first-quarter net loss widened to $23.2 billion, or $4.09 a share, pushing Fannie Mae’s net worth below zero for the second time. The credit quality of loans and mortgage bonds that Fannie Mae owns or guarantees deteriorated amid the yearlong economic recession and as the government forced the company to help struggling homeowners refinance or modify their loans...

    ...“We expect to have a net worth deficit in future periods, and therefore will be required to obtain additional funding from the Treasury,” Washington-based Fannie Mae said in a statement...
    That last item seems pretty clear. The "political economy" at its finest...:rolleyes:

    Comment

    Working...
    X