Re: Ian Gordon and his Dow 1000 forecast
It is fitting and proper for groups to have some boundaries, some defining attributes that will exclude some otherwise interested parties. For example, nations should have immigration limitations that look for those applicants who will best benefit the receiving country, in limited quantities that can be assimilated.
Internet forums and groups have a long, undefended border, so need ways to achieve a healthy focus of common interests and viewpoint.
On the other hand, no group should become a hothouse plant that wilts the first cloudy day. Some diversity of opinion and introduction of new perspectives and experiences is essential to keeping a group robust and vital.
Metalman and Lukester - there seems to me a modest risk that each of you could be taking a slightly too "religious" position, as if this were a matter of principle, black and white.
In my view, nero was a little too stuck in his own view and a little too rude in his dismissal of disagreement to make a really good contribution to iTulip, at least at this time. Those who arrive here with viewpoints further removed from iTulip's developed positions will have the burden of being better at discussing and presenting their position and of demonstrating that they really do understand ours. That's ok -- nero may well enjoy the last laugh if his investments do well.
I would not necessarily encourage anyone with nero's viewpoint to move on elsewhere, but I would ask them to display above average communication skills.
Nor would I necessarilly want anyone with a centrist iTulip position to spend much time here, if their personal communication skills were sufficiently annoying.
Tradeoffs, balances, ...
It is fitting and proper for groups to have some boundaries, some defining attributes that will exclude some otherwise interested parties. For example, nations should have immigration limitations that look for those applicants who will best benefit the receiving country, in limited quantities that can be assimilated.
Internet forums and groups have a long, undefended border, so need ways to achieve a healthy focus of common interests and viewpoint.
On the other hand, no group should become a hothouse plant that wilts the first cloudy day. Some diversity of opinion and introduction of new perspectives and experiences is essential to keeping a group robust and vital.
Metalman and Lukester - there seems to me a modest risk that each of you could be taking a slightly too "religious" position, as if this were a matter of principle, black and white.
In my view, nero was a little too stuck in his own view and a little too rude in his dismissal of disagreement to make a really good contribution to iTulip, at least at this time. Those who arrive here with viewpoints further removed from iTulip's developed positions will have the burden of being better at discussing and presenting their position and of demonstrating that they really do understand ours. That's ok -- nero may well enjoy the last laugh if his investments do well.
I would not necessarily encourage anyone with nero's viewpoint to move on elsewhere, but I would ask them to display above average communication skills.
Nor would I necessarilly want anyone with a centrist iTulip position to spend much time here, if their personal communication skills were sufficiently annoying.
Tradeoffs, balances, ...
Comment