Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

When Gorden Brown Sold Britain’s Gold

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • When Gorden Brown Sold Britain’s Gold

    WHEN GORDEN BROWN SOLD BRITAIN’S GOLD

    In 1999, it was rumored that investment bank Goldman Sachs had a 1,000 ton gold short position in the markets. Goldman Sachs was betting that the price of gold would continue to fall and they would be amply rewarded for their apparent “risk”.

    Because of central bank manipulation, the price of gold had moved inversely to the rise of stocks for almost 20 years and bankers were making easy money on the bet gold would continue its downward spiral.

    However, much to the shock of Goldman Sachs and the central bankers, in 1999 gold stopped falling; and, because Goldman Sachs’ short position was so large, Goldman possibly could suffer catastrophic losses.

    This is when England’s then Chancellor of the Exchequer, Gordon Brown, on May 8, 1999 announced England would sell over 50 % of its gold reserves, 415 tons of the most precious metal on earth at the very bottom of the market.

    The decision to sell England’s gold thereby saved Goldman Sachs and insured the political future of Gordon Brown. Goldman Sachs’ is still in business and Gordon Brown is now the Prime Minister of England—proving that good things come to those who do the bidding of the powerful (whether either outcome was worth 415 tons of England’s gold is questionable)

    Selling a nation’s gold to save the bankers’ parasitic system is now common practice as the banker’s system continues to collapse and gold continues to rise. Since Gordon Brown sold England’s gold, gold has risen from $275 dollars per ounce to its present price of over $900 despite the thousands of tons of central bank gold sold to prevent its inexorable movement higher.



    GOLD SALE ENDS SOON

    The downward pressure on gold will end soon because central bank supplies of gold are running out. For the past thirty-five years, thousands of tons of central bank gold have been sold to force gold lower. When those supplies are gone, so, too, will be the gold prices we see today.

    When the central bank cap on gold is finally forced off, gold will not just be off to the races, gold will bolt the barn leaving it and the racetrack far behind; so far, central bankers have been successful at preventing this. Soon, they will be unable to do so.

    Each run-up in gold has forced central bankers to sell their ever dwindling stocks to keep the price of gold from going parabolic. When gold made its run in the fall of 2007 from $680 to $1,033 in spring 2008, the Swiss National Bank sold 22 tons of gold to cap gold’s rise.

    One year later (after the collapse of global stock markets in the fall of 2008), gold made another run at $1,000; but this time when gold hit $1,009 on February 20th , LeMetropole reported central banks sold 220 tons of gold to force gold below $900.

    In 2008, 22 tons of gold were necessary to force gold down from $1,000. In 2009, 220 tons were required to do the same. Next time, central banks may not have enough gold to turn back an even more powerful tide of paper money seeking the safety of gold.

    After LeMetropole noted the sale of 220 tons of central bank gold, the Financial Times next reported that the Washington Accord capping central bank gold sales at 500 tons a year may be renegotiated to allow higher sales.

    The sale of over 220 tons of central bank gold in only nine weeks leaves approximately only 250 tons left to be sold the rest of the year; and, if stock markets collapse again this year—and they will—gold will explode upwards but this time with far greater force and take out $1,000 as easily as a herd of bulls would take out a picket fence as they run for freedom—especially if central bank sales of gold are limited as they are today.

    We are in the last days of paper money’s longest run. No economy built on fiat paper money has ever lasted in the history of the world; and, although governments have tried to do so for almost 1,000 years, all have failed. That the current system lasted three hundred years did not mean it would last forever.

    As Bernard Madoff’s Ponzi scheme attests, no fraud, no matter how large, i.e. $50 billion or $50 trillion, can withstand the test of time. Not even a Ponzi scheme that has enlisted the participation and cooperation of all governments and all central banks.

    All frauds come to an end, even one as large and as long-lasting as the banker’s substitution of government coupons for gold and silver. The game is over except for the shouting—and not even all the King’s men, e.g. Bernanke, Geithner, Volcker, Summers, et. al., can put Humpty-Dumpty together again.

    It’s been two years since I presented my analysis, How To Survive The Crisis And Prosper In The Process, to Marshall Thurber’s Positive Deviant Network. In my book, I predicted that real estate would fall 40 % – 80 % and stocks 70 % to 90 %. Today, we’re halfway there.

    This Sunday, Martha and I leave for Hungary to attend the final session of Professor Antal E. Fekete’s Gold Standard University Live, a torch that will now be carried in part by the Gold Standard Institute, see http://www.goldstandardinstitute.com/.

    The Institute’s own charge is to be a voice and catalyst for freedom. We live in dangerous times, times where government, our own and others, in league with private bankers pose the greatest threat to both our freedoms and to our welfare.

    Though, today, we look to government to provide and protect our freedoms and welfare, we are fools for so doing. Throughout the ages, the greatest threat to freedom has always been government. It is no less so today. To be unaware of the dangers of government is directly contrary to the principles upon which America was founded.

    The American experiment was mankind’s first attempt to limit the power of government in order to preserve the freedoms of the individual. Unfortunately, over time, this wonderful and wondrous experiment has buckled beneath government’s insatiable need to control in combination with the bankers’ insatiable need to profit.

    Believing that government is now our protector against both tyranny and economic subjugation points out the futility of our present situation. The bankers, i.e. foxes, are not just in the henhouse, they have owned the US henhouse, via the Federal Reserve, for almost 100 years as they have England’s for almost 300, i.e. the Bank of England.

    We are now about to pay the price for their rogue tenancy. The henhouse was once ours but we allowed it to be taken over by those whose scurrilous and selfish intent ran contrary to the principles of those who established our great nation and the great principles they left behind to guide us.

    Although we weren’t alive when the transgression happened in 1913 with the creation of the Federal Reserve, we are alive today when the consequences of so doing are now upon us. Better days will come but they will come only after the present crisis is long gone.



    Buy gold. Buy silver. Have faith.

  • #2
    Re: When Gorden Brown Sold Britain’s Gold

    Wow that was quite a post from the master of British Brevity.
    Do you have to take a rest for a while and not do any more posts?
    Just kidding. I really appreciate your insights. God's speed Mike.

    As i have said before, i grew up dirt poor, i can sleep outside with a blanket and eat out of a dumpster and be happy, but i fear for our children and their future.
    From poverty comes famine, disease and strife. Its no disgrace to grow up poor but the stuff that comes with it sucks.
    Here's hoping we can get out of this without that.
    c.b.
    Last edited by charliebrown; March 20, 2009, 12:16 AM. Reason: fix typos.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: When Gorden Brown Sold Britain’s Gold

      Is there any data to support the view that the gold market price controls have originated from holders of the physical metal, and that it's not a manipulation of the paper market?

      Everything I can recall seeing in this area has been speculation.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: When Gorden Brown Sold Britain’s Gold

        Miker who is the author of this quoted piece? Antal Fekete is respectable, but there are more than a few fringe types hanging around who quote him and "appropriate" him also. The piece strings together some arguments derived from loose assocations which have all the hallmarks of the gold buggy "gold religion" crowd - and frankly after reading those websites for 4-5 years one spots this kind of glib cheerleading quickly and gets a little tired of it.

        Having said that, I'm firmly and without any hesitation today in the "gold suppression is manifestly real" camp, and I understand that this topic has been hashed over previously here at iTulip where actually one of it's more authoritative and informed proponents (Frank Veneroso's contributions to GATA) been presented and their work discussed.

        I don't wish to co-opt him, but we also have one of our own more knowledgeable iTulipers signing on to this thesis, namely Bart - who did not endorse every specific, but unequivocally insisted there is definitely more there in the PM price action than un-manipulated free markets. What a surprise, eh? Stands to reason, as if gold were not manipulated, it would be one of the very few asset classes today that wasn't! Anyone who has done a little bit of reading around GATA's articles knows this topic is not too easily dismissed.

        Note to Sharky - appreciate your skepticism on that, as it's the hallmark of an observer who likes to keep his feet on the ground, but IMO the core thesis of central bank gold leasing is indeed a very big story. We posted and discussed some interesting articles by Frank Veneroso on this topic here and they actually make a strong case for a good part of the above article's premises. I only suspect that this article's author is not one of the more stringent sources, as the assertions are rolled off just a little too glibly, and there is the trademark goldbuggy agenda sounding through in this piece.

        My point is, yes it's sounding goldbuggy and speculative, but actually the end-game of gold leasing it refers to is IMO quite real, and a big unfolding story. Potentially very large story which can bust wide open. That part is real.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: When Gorden Brown Sold Britain’s Gold

          Originally posted by Lukester View Post
          Note to Sharky - appreciate your skepticism on that, as it's the hallmark of an observer who likes to keep his feet on the ground, but IMO the core thesis of central bank gold leasing is indeed a very big story. We posted and discussed some interesting articles by Frank Veneroso on this topic here and they actually make a strong case for a good part of the above article's premises. I only suspect that this article's author is not one of the more stringent sources, as the assertions are rolled off just a little too glibly, and there is the trademark goldbuggy agenda sounding through in this piece.
          I've been following GATA's arguments along these lines for a long time now, and I agree that the manipulation is happening.

          What I'm skeptical about is the extent of net physical sales by the parties involved in the price manipulation. Based on what I've read, it seems like the central bank sales have largely been to other central banks, rather into the spot or futures markets.

          And the bullion lease programs, as I understand them, involve selling physical metal into the futures market to collect the contango premium. The funds received are then invested in Treasuries. But the gold is (normally) bought back before it has to be delivered -- so there are no net sales (hence "lease"). The problem, of course, is that if gold goes up, there will be a realized loss when the gold is finally re-purchased.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: When Gorden Brown Sold Britain’s Gold

            Originally posted by charliebrown View Post
            Wow that was quite a post from the master of British Brevity.
            I don't think he wrote it.

            Unless he got married or shacked up with someone named Martha

            " This Sunday, Martha and I leave for Hungary to attend the final session of "

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: When Gorden Brown Sold Britain’s Gold

              Sharky - I think the leasing is the "grey area". Veneroso delved into how much "declared" leased gold internationally seemed to tally up with changes in stated bullion reserves spanning a couple of decades - the net of which presented not insignificant mismatches with declared reserves at more than one central bank. Veneroso's work did some rough calculations evidencing that when "adjusted for lies" the depletion rates at central banks vs. their "stated" real reserves suggested a much nearer term critical depletion thresh-hold. I would have to dredge up the article from the archives here to get the details. Maybe Spartacus knows something more about it offhand. You wrote: "But the gold is (normally) bought back before it has to be delivered " - the topic to check out I think (Veneroso's work involves this area, along wth GATA's) is whether the leasing you/we are tracking is the full leasing activity.

              It's tin foil hat stuff, so easy to get ridiculed for, but the collection of arguing points Veneroso put together were compelling and fascinating. He's not a lightweight in gold/commodities, and duly cautious with his assertions.

              Originally posted by Sharky View Post
              I've been following GATA's arguments along these lines for a long time now, and I agree that the manipulation is happening.

              What I'm skeptical about is the extent of net physical sales by the parties involved in the price manipulation. Based on what I've read, it seems like the central bank sales have largely been to other central banks, rather into the spot or futures markets.

              And the bullion lease programs, as I understand them, involve selling physical metal into the futures market to collect the contango premium. The funds received are then invested in Treasuries. But the gold is (normally) bought back before it has to be delivered -- so there are no net sales (hence "lease"). The problem, of course, is that if gold goes up, there will be a realized loss when the gold is finally re-purchased.
              Last edited by Contemptuous; March 20, 2009, 12:03 PM.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: When Gorden Brown Sold Britain’s Gold

                Got a link?
                Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. -Groucho

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: When Gorden Brown Sold Britain’s Gold

                  Sorry Guys
                  I was e-mailed me a contact in Oz..........who is there now & again.
                  Mike

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    What Mega posted is an excerpt from this article written by Darryl Robert Schoon and posted to kitco on March 18th.

                    http://www.kitco.com/ind/schoon/mar182009.html

                    I was not previously familiar with and don't know anything about Schoon.

                    (Copy and paste the first sentence of the excerpt into google, there are 8 matching results, I clicked on the 8th, a blog entry that provides the kitco link)
                    Last edited by Slimprofits; March 20, 2009, 04:48 PM.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X