Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Geithner pushing for IMF to 'mobilize' gold

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Geithner pushing for IMF to 'mobilize' gold

    Originally posted by thisandthat.nowandth View Post
    I researched this issue in early 08, and was able to locate a chart showing the correlation between IMF Gold sales of the late 70's, and the advancing POG.

    Sinclair' take: http://www.gata.org/node/5988
    Do you have the location of this chart handy?

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Geithner pushing for IMF to 'mobilize' gold

      Originally posted by blazespinnaker View Post
      You can't eat gold
      Yes you can! http://www.delafee.com/edible-gold.php

      you can't fight with gold
      I bet if I threw one of these your way, I'd win. http://tinyurl.com/bcmfg6

      you can't even put gol in your car
      You sir, appear to be very misinformed: http://tinyurl.com/bdpv2w

      :p;)
      Warning: Network Engineer talking economics!

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Geithner pushing for IMF to 'mobilize' gold

        Originally posted by rockyoyster View Post
        According to http://www.fms.treas.gov/gold/current.html

        Total - Treasury-Owned Gold 261,498,899.316 (FineTroy Ounces) $11,041,058,821.09
        Thank you rokyoyster and thanks all for answer. I know very little about precious metals.

        So if the Treasury has 261.5 mil of fine troy ounces of gold at the current spot prices, or let's say $1000oz, that means $261 bil. If the price goes to $4000 oz (in some crazy SHTF scenario) that means roughly $1trillion. That is not a lot compared to the size of the current black holes.

        If they use that in a mix between BIS and IMF, tasked to enforcing a Breton Woods 3, maybe it can do the trick (I call Breton Woods 2 the current unofficial Chimerica agreement )

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Geithner pushing for IMF to 'mobilize' gold

          Originally posted by rockyoyster View Post
          According to http://www.fms.treas.gov/gold/current.html

          Total - Treasury-Owned Gold 261,498,899.316 (FineTroy Ounces) $11,041,058,821.09
          If the above is true, then it does not even pay for Freddie Mac's last quarter shortfall.

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: Geithner pushing for IMF to 'mobilize' gold

            Originally posted by rockyoyster View Post
            Do you have the location of this chart handy?
            Sorry, that was a couple hard drives ago - tried to relocate it tonight to no avail. If it's any help, here's is a written history of IMF gold sales: http://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/facts/gold.htm


            US gold reserves are still valued at the official rate of $42.222 oz. Interesting note is that the Federal Reserve holds a claim against 'our' gold reserves in the form of Treasury issued gold certificates. You'll find the entry listed on the Fed H.4.1 under Gold Certificate Account.
            http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h41/Current/

            IOW, the Treasury, and the Fed, each claim the official gold reserves as an asset on their respective balance sheets - go figure. L. Rockwell and others have drawn attention to this peculiarity - J. Turk is quoted on this practice in a 2001 GATA report:

            "The U.S. Gold Reserve does double duty. It sits in the vaults at Fort Knox and the other depositories, but the U.S. Treasury has issued Gold Certificates against it. The Federal Reserve owns these Gold Certificates, giving the Fed a claim to the 261.6 million ounces in the U.S. Gold Reserve."

            GATA Says Much of U.S. Gold Reserve is Encumbered - CBS MarketWatch

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: Geithner pushing for IMF to 'mobilize' gold

              Originally posted by blazespinnaker View Post
              What would you rather have:

              The US Military

              or

              The Chinese Military + the world gold reserves?


              You can't eat gold, you can't fight with gold, you can't even put gold in your car. It's pretty useless.

              While I am no fan of might makes right, trust me, might != gold. Might == guns.
              b) please. How else to pay for a)?
              It's Economics vs Thermodynamics. Thermodynamics wins.

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: Geithner pushing for IMF to 'mobilize' gold

                Originally posted by blazespinnaker View Post
                You can't eat gold, you can't fight with gold, you can't even put gold in your car. It's pretty useless.
                Oh, come on. Gold is money. That's like saying money is pretty useless: you can't eat money, you can't fight with money and you can't put money in your car. But you can certainly buy food with gold, buy soldiers with gold and buy oil with gold. Doesn't sound useless at all to me.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: Geithner pushing for IMF to 'mobilize' gold

                  Originally posted by Sharky View Post
                  Oh, come on. Gold is money. That's like saying money is pretty useless: you can't eat money, you can't fight with money and you can't put money in your car. But you can certainly buy food with gold, buy soldiers with gold and buy oil with gold. Doesn't sound useless at all to me.
                  gold is USELESS, you can't PRINT IT. What good is that?!?:p:p:p

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: Geithner pushing for IMF to 'mobilize' gold

                    Originally posted by blazespinnaker View Post
                    What would you rather have:

                    The US Military

                    or

                    The Chinese Military + the world gold reserves?


                    You can't eat gold, you can't fight with gold, you can't even put gold in your car. It's pretty useless.

                    While I am no fan of might makes right, trust me, might != gold. Might == guns.
                    Or I can be rich AND have might, it just takes Gold AND GUNS. Duh!

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: Geithner pushing for IMF to 'mobilize' gold

                      Originally posted by *T* View Post
                      b) please. How else to pay for a)?
                      by selling US Treasuries or printing dollars.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: Geithner pushing for IMF to 'mobilize' gold

                        Originally posted by rockyoyster View Post
                        Whoa... Where's the time machine?
                        I think Fred has it.


                        posted by Fred:


                        Where do I get one?

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: Geithner pushing for IMF to 'mobilize' gold

                          Originally posted by blazespinnaker View Post
                          What would you rather have:

                          The US Military

                          or

                          The Chinese Military + the world gold reserves?


                          You can't eat gold, you can't fight with gold, you can't even put gold in your car. It's pretty useless.

                          While I am no fan of might makes right, trust me, might != gold. Might == guns.
                          Is it possible, blaze, that the USSR collapsed because they had too much gold and not enough nukes? or maybe that is the other way around?

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Re: Geithner pushing for IMF to 'mobilize' gold

                            Originally posted by LargoWinch View Post
                            Is it possible, blaze, that the USSR collapsed because they had too much gold and not enough nukes? or maybe that is the other way around?
                            Absolutely, but that wasn't an issue of gold. That was an issue of a fundamentally unstable society.

                            Personally, I think the US is far more stable than China, especially considering China's economic well being is pretty much dependent on selling to the US.

                            Anyways, you know I love you guys. I'm just not a gold bug

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X