The businessinsider quotes an article from the NYT, "Obama Disses Economics Blogs"
http://www.businessinsider.com/obama...eliable-2009-3
NYT: "(Obama) said he did not find blogs to be reliable, citing the economy as one example. 'Part of the reason we don't spend a lot of time looking at blogs', he said, 'is because if you haven't looked at it very carefully, then you may be under the impression that somehow there's a clean answer one way or another--well, you just nationalize all the banks, or you just leave them alone and they'll be fine' ".
The author of the businessinsider article, Joe Weisenthal responds,
"So there you go. We'll keep talking about this stuff, going back and forth, but understanding that nobody upstairs is paying close attention.
That being said, he's wrong. The bloggers we follow spend an amazing amount of time, deeply picking apart these messy questions".
There are some interesting comments that follow. My favorite is Dave's posting on March 7, 2009, 7:46 PM. After stating that he works at an investment bank, he writes that "you (the unprivileged blogger) are not privy to the details required to ananlyze the issues...and...must thus boil down intricate issues to 'blog bites' your readers can digest in a few minutes".
Here is my question for Dave; does he consider Simon Johnson, Paul Krugman, Nouriel Roubini and EJ to be nothing more than "blog bites"?
http://www.businessinsider.com/obama...eliable-2009-3
NYT: "(Obama) said he did not find blogs to be reliable, citing the economy as one example. 'Part of the reason we don't spend a lot of time looking at blogs', he said, 'is because if you haven't looked at it very carefully, then you may be under the impression that somehow there's a clean answer one way or another--well, you just nationalize all the banks, or you just leave them alone and they'll be fine' ".
The author of the businessinsider article, Joe Weisenthal responds,
"So there you go. We'll keep talking about this stuff, going back and forth, but understanding that nobody upstairs is paying close attention.
That being said, he's wrong. The bloggers we follow spend an amazing amount of time, deeply picking apart these messy questions".
There are some interesting comments that follow. My favorite is Dave's posting on March 7, 2009, 7:46 PM. After stating that he works at an investment bank, he writes that "you (the unprivileged blogger) are not privy to the details required to ananlyze the issues...and...must thus boil down intricate issues to 'blog bites' your readers can digest in a few minutes".
Here is my question for Dave; does he consider Simon Johnson, Paul Krugman, Nouriel Roubini and EJ to be nothing more than "blog bites"?
Comment