a post at bill fleckenstein's site:
Hello Bill,
I have emailed you before regarding a forecasting firm called ECRI. They continue to nail the economic and inflation cycles, having called the 2001 recession, the "jobless recovery", the CPI up cycle, the housing downturn and most recently the global industrial slowdown that is currently underway. Their long leading index began showing a slowdown to emerge in the 2nd half of 2006 in late 2005.
I go through this only because they are now saying that a general recession in the 1st half of 2007 is now very unlikely. They see the global industrial slowdown continuing (hence weak commodity prices), but they see the US service sector accelerating late in Q1 through mid year. Combining the two they are forecasting a modest uptick in growth through the 1st half.
Is it not possible that the manufaturing portion (housing centric specifically) of the economy is in recession while the massive credit creation plus willingness to borrow continues to fuel the service sector? Seems to me that the finance sector is a MAJOR driver of the service sector and as long as more and more debt is being offered/taken, then this could prop up the economy longer than the "acute" bears think.
I agree with your assessment long term, but what do you think about the possibility of a 1987-style event prior to the economy finally rolling over? You have mentioned the same kind of reckless leverage being used in 1987 and that crash occurred without a general recession.
I know you likely disagree with ECRI's forecast, but what probability do you put on a 1987 style market event that clears the system of a lot of the reckless leverage (Yen carry trade, options selling etc) but without a general recession occurring?
fleck:• I just don't see the services sector coming to life when it was housing related stuff that kept the economy going... so now that it's tanking, suddenly services will spring to life and save the day? I don't see that... maybe it will but I don't see why it ought to. If we have an '87 like event-- which I expect at some point-- the economy will roll over big time after it.
Hello Bill,
I have emailed you before regarding a forecasting firm called ECRI. They continue to nail the economic and inflation cycles, having called the 2001 recession, the "jobless recovery", the CPI up cycle, the housing downturn and most recently the global industrial slowdown that is currently underway. Their long leading index began showing a slowdown to emerge in the 2nd half of 2006 in late 2005.
I go through this only because they are now saying that a general recession in the 1st half of 2007 is now very unlikely. They see the global industrial slowdown continuing (hence weak commodity prices), but they see the US service sector accelerating late in Q1 through mid year. Combining the two they are forecasting a modest uptick in growth through the 1st half.
Is it not possible that the manufaturing portion (housing centric specifically) of the economy is in recession while the massive credit creation plus willingness to borrow continues to fuel the service sector? Seems to me that the finance sector is a MAJOR driver of the service sector and as long as more and more debt is being offered/taken, then this could prop up the economy longer than the "acute" bears think.
I agree with your assessment long term, but what do you think about the possibility of a 1987-style event prior to the economy finally rolling over? You have mentioned the same kind of reckless leverage being used in 1987 and that crash occurred without a general recession.
I know you likely disagree with ECRI's forecast, but what probability do you put on a 1987 style market event that clears the system of a lot of the reckless leverage (Yen carry trade, options selling etc) but without a general recession occurring?
fleck:• I just don't see the services sector coming to life when it was housing related stuff that kept the economy going... so now that it's tanking, suddenly services will spring to life and save the day? I don't see that... maybe it will but I don't see why it ought to. If we have an '87 like event-- which I expect at some point-- the economy will roll over big time after it.
Comment