LONDON — No one disputes that Iceland’s economic troubles are largely the country’s own fault. But there may be more to the story, at least in the view of Iceland’s government, its citizens and even some outsiders. As grave as their situation already was, they say, Britain — their old friend, NATO ally and trading partner — made it immeasurably worse.
The troubles between the countries began three weeks ago when Britain took the extraordinary step of using its 2001 antiterrorism laws to freeze the British assets of a failing Icelandic bank. That appeared to brand Iceland a terrorist state.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/02/wo...02iceland.html
Question: Who gets to call countries terrorist states for fiscal address? The US and...Britain? Anybody else? First come, first labeled :confused:
The troubles between the countries began three weeks ago when Britain took the extraordinary step of using its 2001 antiterrorism laws to freeze the British assets of a failing Icelandic bank. That appeared to brand Iceland a terrorist state.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/02/wo...02iceland.html
Question: Who gets to call countries terrorist states for fiscal address? The US and...Britain? Anybody else? First come, first labeled :confused: