Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Regarding Gold-related stocks

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Stock No Substitute For The Real Thing

    Originally posted by DemonD
    I am wondering about playing the coming gold/commodities hyperinflation scenario by buying shares in gold companies. (I am generally more comfortable with companies as opposed to mutual funds because I feel I have more control over what exactly I'm buying.)

    Am I an anti-bug? I'm not sure about that, but the idea of buying gold bullion or gold coins and storing them in a safe or deposit box, or even buying gold and having it held by an institution just is very unappealing to me.

    I am personally very pro-stock-ownership. To a certain extent I feel that taking my money and putting it into a large, steady, dividend paying large cap such as Altria or Johnson and Johnson is safer, in the long run, than putting it into a savings account. To this extent, I'd rather entrust my dollars to a steady gold-related company with a management that I can find confidence in as opposed to holding gold myself (in other words, I have more confidence in others to preserve or create my wealth through gold than I do myself).

    I've got a list of gold mining and related companies that I'm watching, and I'm not looking for advice on specific companies (nor am I looking for advice on why I shouldn't buy gold companies and invest in a different way)

    However, I'm not able to find historic stock prices of any gold-related company from the 1970's and the 1980's to see if those securities popped up with the gold bubble from that time period.

    Is anyone planning on going this route? And subsequently, can anyone point out information about gold-related share prices from the 1980 era?

    thanks
    In a bull market for real assets, financial assets are no substitute. Mining stock is a financial asset. Bullion is a real asset. Mining company stock is likely to handily outperform other types of stock in a gold bull market, but it is nevertheless still fundamentally stock, a paper asset, not gold.

    In the 1970's bull market, gold bullion went up by 2400% and the best of the producing gold mining companies only went up 300%. You would have had to guess the right junior mining company in order to beat the performance of bullion.

    Part of the reason for this is that equities are future money discounting mechanisms just like bonds. When P/E ratios are below 10 that means earnings yields are over 10% - analogous to bond yields. Dividend yields are precisely analogous to bond yields. You can think of a stock as a bond in which the future coupon payments are variable, based on the fortunes of the company.

    Most of the multiple compression in the 1970s and the multiple expansion of the 1980s and 1990s was part of the same phenomenon as the price to yield compression and expansion of bonds. The rate of discount of future money changed. The only difference with stocks is that the expected future cash stream itself is higher if payouts are expected to grow and vice versa.

    That is why mining stocks will face a headwind compared to bullion and futures if bonds sell off and interest rates rise. The expected future cash flows may grow enough to overcome it, but an increasing discount rate is a depressant nevertheless. All else being equal, the same leverage embedded in a stock and a future (or margined bullion) must give you a lower return in the stock than in the future in a rising rate environment.

    You also have a variety of confounding factors that may cause your stock investment to go bad even if your thesis about gold is correct; company risk, management risk, political risk, etceteras. Whatever you do, do not buy mining stock merely because you are bullish on the commodity the company mines.

    My view is that there is nothing at all wrong with putting some of your portfolio in mining stock. This is especially true if you are selecting companies on the basis of fundamentals and taking care to first estimate an intrinsic value of the shares before buying. But it is not a substitute for hard money in your portfolio.
    Finster
    ...

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Stock No Substitute For The Real Thing

      Originally posted by Finster
      In a bull market for real assets, financial assets are no substitute. Mining stock is a financial asset. Bullion is a real asset. Mining company stock is likely to handily outperform other types of stock in a gold bull market, but it is nevertheless still fundamentally stock, a paper asset, not gold.

      In the 1970's bull market, gold bullion went up by 2400% and the best of the producing gold mining companies only went up 300%. You would have had to guess the right junior mining company in order to beat the performance of bullion.

      Part of the reason for this is that equities are future money discounting mechanisms just like bonds. When P/E ratios are below 10 that means earnings yields are over 10% - analogous to bond yields. Dividend yields are precisely analogous to bond yields. You can think of a stock as a bond in which the future coupon payments are variable, based on the fortunes of the company.

      Most of the multiple compression in the 1970s and the multiple expansion of the 1980s and 1990s was part of the same phenomenon as the price to yield compression and expansion of bonds. The rate of discount of future money changed. The only difference with stocks is that the expected future cash stream itself is higher if payouts are expected to grow and vice versa.

      That is why mining stocks will face a headwind compared to bullion and futures if bonds sell off and interest rates rise. The expected future cash flows may grow enough to overcome it, but an increasing discount rate is a depressant nevertheless. All else being equal, the same leverage embedded in a stock and a future (or margined bullion) must give you a lower return in the stock than in the future in a rising rate environment.

      You also have a variety of confounding factors that may cause your stock investment to go bad even if your thesis about gold is correct; company risk, management risk, political risk, etceteras. Whatever you do, do not buy mining stock merely because you are bullish on the commodity the company mines.

      My view is that there is nothing at all wrong with putting some of your portfolio in mining stock. This is especially true if you are selecting companies on the basis of fundamentals and taking care to first estimate an intrinsic value of the shares before buying. But it is not a substitute for hard money in your portfolio.
      there is also another reason to remember that mining stock is stock. when the equity market sells off, mining stocks sell off as well. now, not many miners are in the indices, nem is the only one in the s&p500. so if someone is liquidating an index fund position, nem will be sold along with everything else. also when there is a sell-off there is a retreat from risk. [capital is a coward.] so there tends to be across the board trimming of equity positions. along with risk reduction and a desire to lock in prior gains, margin calls will also cause people to liquidate any and all stock positions, the winners with the losers. if metals have risen significantly, you may see the miners poking their heads up after the sell-off, but they will have sold off along with everything else before that can happen.

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Regarding Gold-related stocks

        Whether anyone on this board decides to buy bullion, ETFs, stocks, or some combination of the three, I recommend that you buy one ounce of physical gold. The reason is that until you do this, you cannot appreciate what gold represents and why it behaves the way it does as hybrid commodity-money, as Greenspan recently said, rising and falling in real terms in line with perceived decreases and increases in financial system risk.

        Back when I was doing my original research on gold starting in 1999 before writing my 2001 article on the subject, I'd hand one ounce gold, silver and platinum coins to friends and their children and ask them: "Which is worth more?" I repeated the experiment several dozen times over a couple of years.

        Invariably, even children as young as four valued the gold coin above the others–correct with respect to silver, incorrect with respect to platinum. The adults did somewhat better, but only the 50% or so that thought to ask the spot price of platinum. My favorite response was from a fellow board member of a VC-backed high tech company in 1999. She sneered and said, "None of them are worth anything," and tossed them back at me with contempt. In 2002, a fellow CEO at a quarterly meeting among a group of CEOs (CEOs don't have friends and so have to hang out with each other), tossed the gold coin back at me and said, simply, "Nuts."

        Assets for which there is a lack of interest is often a good place to start looking for a bargain, but assets that inspire actual contempt are even better. Doesn't mean the asset is necessarily underpriced, but the strong negative sentiment is a key indicator of underpricing in the company of several others.

        To adults, gold has a symbolic value that is very powerful. The word "gold" is used very frequently in many contexts, such as in ads for everything from cars to beer, to confer "value" to a product. The cliche "gold standard" over-used in the context of products is used as a short-hand for "best in class" In The Late, Great American Dollar (2004), I apply the modern concept of "brand" to gold, as well as the dollar. Gold's "brand" value was bottoming out in 2001, as the dollar's was peaking. Another key indicator for a trend trade.

        I'm not sure I can characterize what the children were responding to when they chose gold over platinum and silver. Maybe even by age four they've already been exposed to enough uses of the word "gold" on TV and in print media to pick up on the connotation. Or maybe there's something in our little reptilian brains that responds to it. In any case, if you hold an oz of gold in your hand, you immediately get the idea, one that you can't get by looking at a print out of shares in a gold mining company or an ETF. Further, owning an oz of gold will tell you what you are actually buying when you buy shares, so it's good due diligence.
        Last edited by EJ; October 18, 2006, 02:39 PM.

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Regarding Gold-related stocks

          Originally posted by EJ
          ...
          Invariably, even children as young as four valued the gold coin above the others–correct with respect to silver, incorrect with respect to platinum. The adults did somewhat better, but only the 50% or so that thought to ask the spot price of platinum.
          ...
          My favorite explanation of that phenomenon, which I've noticed for decades, came in the late '70s from a friend... who had also perhaps partaken a bit excessively of the '60s too. He said that its contains a "want me" when one holds it and pays attention. Its also in no way a 1:1 in adults for them to notice it, whatever the phenomenon is.

          My favorite test is to have someone hold out both hands with their eyes closed, and then I place a one ounce gold coin in one hand and a one ounce silver coin in the other. I also place a small heavy card on both hands beforehand so the coin size is not easily detectable. Over 80% so far have correctly chosen gold.


          And maybe I can amaze and perhaps surprise our *Fearless Leader* with this raw data from WebElements.com


          Crustal rock, parts per billion of various metals
          Metal..........ppb, by weight.......ratio to gold
          Iridium (ir)------.4-----------------.1
          Rhodium (rh)----.7-----------------.2
          Gold (au)-------3.1----------------1.0
          Palladium (pd)-6.3----------------2.0
          Platinum (pt)---37---------------11.9
          Mercury (hg)----67---------------21.6
          Silver (ag)-------80--------------25.8
          Molybdenum-1,100-------------354.8
          Uranium (u)--1,800-------------580.6
          Lead (pb)---10,000-----------3,325.8
          Copper (cu)-68,000---------21,935.5
          Nickel (ni)---90,000---------29,032.3
          http://www.NowAndTheFuture.com

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: Regarding Gold-related stocks

            Fun. This takes me back. How much gold in rocks, sea water, etc.? The question is the cost of extraction and purification.

            http://www.goldfever.com/gold_sea.htm

            Re platinum...

            "Approximately 10 tons of ore must be mined - sometimes almost a mile underground at temperatures greater than 120 degrees Fahrenheit - to produce one pure ounce of the "so-called white gold." Furthermore, the total extraction process takes six long months."

            http://www.gold-eagle.com/analysis/platinum.html

            All the platinum ever mined throughout history would make a cube less than 25 cubic feet. Gold, 60 cubic feet.

            And so on. This is, of course, the whole point of precious metal based money–the relatively slow rate of extraction/processsing versus the speed of the printing press does what politicians often have a hard time doing, limiting the rate of money growth. New gold production has averaged 3% per year for decades, coincidentally the Keynesian "ideal" rate of inflation. Of course, they can stiill play around with reserve requirements.

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: Regarding Gold-related stocks

              Oh well... I had some small hope that you were unaware of that general data. It can be deceptive too, as far as the ratios, since there are many other factors involved in real valuations, like the cost of mining one that you noted.

              It usually does surprise people to see the real range of scarcity though, and I especially like that 26:1 silver ratio. It *should* outperform gold as the "poor man's gold", plus has many other positives.

              Your white gold comment reminded me of another possible zinger. "White gold" does apply to platinum, but also applies to a mix of 75-90% gold plus other metals like nickel, zinc or palladium... as well as gold that is plated.
              Last edited by bart; October 18, 2006, 08:27 PM.
              http://www.NowAndTheFuture.com

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: Regarding Gold-related stocks

                Originally posted by bart
                Oh well... I had some small hope that you were unaware of that general data. It can be deceptive too, as far as the ratios, since there are many other factors involved in real valuations, like the cost of mining one that you noted.

                It usually does surprise people to see the real range of scarcity though, and I especially like that 26:1 silver ratio. It *should* outperform gold as the "poor man's gold", plus has many other positives.

                Your white gold comment reminded me of another possible zinger. "White gold" does apply to platinum, but also applies to a mix of 75-90% gold plus other metals like nickel, zinc or palladium... as well as gold that is plated.
                And even though platinum's scarcity/price ratio relative to gold suggests a much higher price differential, the #1 use of platinum is in catalytic converters, where a little bit goes a long way.

                I did one platinum trade ever, as an experiment: 100 oz. buy Apr. 2003 $605, sell Apr. 2004 $930. Very illiquid market. Local coin store guy had a heck of a time getting his hands on 100 oz. As I recall, took two weeks, during which time the price went up $50. He loves to tell everyone the story. Guess I got lucky on the timing.

                Platinum does poorly in "Ka" disinflationary periods, even worse than gold:

                "Investment demand for platinum is a wildcard. Demand for investment-grade metal has been extremely volatile over the last ten years. In the year 2000, investment demand actually went negative as hoarded supplies were dumped onto the market."

                http://www.azom.com/details.asp?articleID=1344

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: Regarding Gold-related stocks

                  Originally posted by EJ
                  And even though platinum's scarcity/price ratio relative to gold suggests a much higher price differential, the #1 use of platinum is in catalytic converters, where a little bit goes a long way.

                  I did one platinum trade ever, as an experiment: 100 oz. buy Apr. 2003 $605, sell Apr. 2004 $930. Very illiquid market. Local coin store guy had a heck of a time getting his hands on 100 oz. As I recall, took two weeks, during which time the price went up $50. He loves to tell everyone the story. Guess I got lucky on the timing.

                  Platinum does poorly in "Ka" disinflationary periods, even worse than gold:

                  "Investment demand for platinum is a wildcard. Demand for investment-grade metal has been extremely volatile over the last ten years. In the year 2000, investment demand actually went negative as hoarded supplies were dumped onto the market."

                  http://www.azom.com/details.asp?articleID=1344

                  Very nicely done on that trade, and having a dealer tell stories about it is a great bonus. I'm not buying the luck side of it, nice try though. ;)

                  I've never traded it myself, either physicals or futures. Part of it is the liquidity issue - gold has at least 30x the open interest (total live contracts, for those who may not know) and silver at least 10x. Platinum doesn't even have 10,000 open contracts right now.
                  I think more of it has to do with that phenomenon you noted earlier though - holding a gold coin or bar just plain feels a lot better than a platinum coin or bar.
                  http://www.NowAndTheFuture.com

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: Regarding Gold-related stocks

                    Another random question:

                    Best companies for platinum mining?

                    And another:

                    What other companies (besides mining companies) benefit from a rise in gold and other PM's?

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: Regarding Gold-related stocks

                      Originally posted by DemonD
                      ...
                      However, I'm not able to find historic stock prices of any gold-related company from the 1970's and the 1980's to see if those securities popped up with the gold bubble from that time period.

                      Is anyone planning on going this route? And subsequently, can anyone point out information about gold-related share prices from the 1980 era?

                      Join the club. I'm sure there are some who have stock data from that period but little has been publicized that I know of. This is one of the few items I have and I think its from Doug Casey's site.



                      A large library and a lot of hours may ferret out more. Most stocks from that period no longer exist.

                      There are many opinions about mining stocks in the '70s - mine is that unless you're an amazing stock picker, you'll be better off sticking with the straight metal via CEF or similat or actual segretated physical at places like Kitco or the Perth Mint.
                      http://www.NowAndTheFuture.com

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: Regarding Gold-related stocks

                        Originally posted by EJ
                        And even though platinum's scarcity/price ratio relative to gold suggests a much higher price differential, the #1 use of platinum is in catalytic converters, where a little bit goes a long way.

                        I did one platinum trade ever, as an experiment: 100 oz. buy Apr. 2003 $605, sell Apr. 2004 $930. Very illiquid market. Local coin store guy had a heck of a time getting his hands on 100 oz. As I recall, took two weeks, during which time the price went up $50. He loves to tell everyone the story. Guess I got lucky on the timing.

                        Platinum does poorly in "Ka" disinflationary periods, even worse than gold:

                        "Investment demand for platinum is a wildcard. Demand for investment-grade metal has been extremely volatile over the last ten years. In the year 2000, investment demand actually went negative as hoarded supplies were dumped onto the market."

                        http://www.azom.com/details.asp?articleID=1344
                        FWIW, I like platinum as a diversifier for the hard money part of my portfolio. Gold is king there, but in addition to that and silver, some platinum and copper play supporting roles. They are all monetary commodities in some respect, and in the unlikely event of some major fundamental development in one or the other such as a huge new find, you haven't put all your coins in one basket.
                        Finster
                        ...

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: Regarding Gold-related stocks

                          Can anyone speak to the disadvantages of using options to take a position in metals instead of buying stocks/ETFs/bullion outright?

                          Specifically thinking of 3-4 year expirations with a high strike price.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Re: Regarding Gold-related stocks

                            Originally posted by WDCRob
                            Can anyone speak to the disadvantages of using options to take a position in metals instead of buying stocks/ETFs/bullion outright?

                            Specifically thinking of 3-4 year expirations with a high strike price.
                            if you're thinking this way, then you already know the disadvantages. your idea seems like a good way to buy some cheap insurance on a runaway inflation/runaway gold price.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Re: Regarding Gold-related stocks

                              Thanks JK. You're right that I've got a basic handle on it. But since no one had mentioned them here I wondered if I was missing something. This is still relatively new.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: Regarding Gold-related stocks

                                Originally posted by WDCRob
                                Thanks JK. You're right that I've got a basic handle on it. But since no one had mentioned them here I wondered if I was missing something. This is still relatively new.
                                i think the question you've got to ask yourself is whether you want to participate in a less extreme rise in gold within the duration of the options.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X