Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

SEC Issues New Rules to Protect Investors Against Naked Short Selling Abuses

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • SEC Issues New Rules to Protect Investors Against Naked Short Selling Abuses

    SEC Issues New Rules to Protect Investors Against Naked Short Selling Abuses

    The Securities and Exchange Commission today took several coordinated actions to strengthen investor protections against "naked" short selling. The Commission's actions will apply to the securities of all public companies, including all companies in the financial sector. The actions are effective at 12:01 a.m. ET on Thursday, Sept. 18, 2008.
    Additional Materials




    "These several actions today make it crystal clear that the SEC has zero tolerance for abusive naked short selling," said SEC Chairman Christopher Cox. "The Enforcement Division, the Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations, and the Division of Trading and Markets will now have these weapons in their arsenal in their continuing battle to stop unlawful manipulation."

    In an ordinary short sale, the short seller borrows a stock and sells it, with the understanding that the loan must be repaid by buying the stock in the market (hopefully at a lower price). But in an abusive naked short transaction, the seller doesn't actually borrow the stock, and fails to deliver it to the buyer. For this reason, naked shorting can allow manipulators to force prices down far lower than would be possible in legitimate short-selling conditions.

    Today's Commission actions, which are the result of rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act, go beyond its previously issued emergency order, which was limited to the securities of financial firms with access to the Federal Reserve's Primary Dealer Credit Facility. Because the agency's exercise of its emergency authority is limited to 30 days, the previous order under Section 12(k)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 expired on Aug. 12, 2008.

    The Commission's actions were as follows:

    Hard T+3 Close-Out Requirement; Penalties for Violation Include Prohibition of Further Short Sales, Mandatory Pre-Borrow

    The Commission adopted, on an interim final basis, a new rule requiring that short sellers and their broker-dealers deliver securities by the close of business on the settlement date (three days after the sale transaction date, or T+3) and imposing penalties for failure to do so.

    If a short sale violates this close-out requirement, then any broker-dealer acting on the short seller's behalf will be prohibited from further short sales in the same security unless the shares are not only located but also pre-borrowed.
    .
    .
    .
    .

    Will these new rules actually be implemented, or are they "window dressing?"
    Last edited by Rajiv; September 18, 2008, 05:29 AM.

  • #2
    Re: SEC Issues New Rules to Protect Investors Against Naked Short Selling Abuses

    sounds promissing. any news on treatment of existing failure to delivers?

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: SEC Issues New Rules to Protect Investors Against Naked Short Selling Abuses

      Originally posted by Rajiv View Post
      Is that the sound of hoove beats getting fainter, and another barn door closing, that I hear??

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: SEC Issues New Rules to Protect Investors Against Naked Short Selling Abuses

        maybe this will stop nasty short sellers from forcing those ceo's to buy all that junky debt!

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: SEC Issues New Rules to Protect Investors Against Naked Short Selling Abuses

          Is it just me or does it look like - NOW - that wallstreet is under pressure by short sellers - there is some activity against that ?

          Nobody cared about short selling when - lets say - gold juniors had short sellers. :rolleyes:

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: SEC Issues New Rules to Protect Investors Against Naked Short Selling Abuses

            Patrick Byrne of Overstock.Com was not impressed:

            Dr. Byrne commented, "At the core of the SEC announcement is a decision that if a hedge fund naked shorts a stock, its broker isn't supposed to let them naked short again. But guess what: they were not supposed to naked short in the first place. Instead of giving the buyer who receives the fail the right to put it back to the naked short selling participant, the SEC once again opts for no penalties for financial rapists.


            "If the SEC were anything but a hedge fund bootlick," continued Byrne, "it would not have taken the half-measure of a pre-borrow requirement applied only as a penalty for those failing to deliver within T+3, but would have instituted a market-wide pre-borrow requirement (as it did in its July 15, 2008 Emergency Order protecting Upper Caste financial firms), and mandatory buy-ins at T+3.

            http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/overstock-ceo-comments-secs-new/story.aspx?guid={EDEA343A-11BD-4264-B468-B07C3A97A50A}&dist=hppr

            Comment

            Working...
            X