something i've been looking forward to for a long time
I've written before that one valid refutation of Butler could be on his claim that shorts must have good reason to believe they could cover (deliver against) their shorts.
Having no knowledge of US law I did not know how to quote the law myself, or even find it.
http://news.silverseek.com/SilverSeek/1212764222.php
"...(a)(1) Each leverage transaction merchant must at all times maintain cover of at least 90 percent of the amount of physical commodities subject to open long leverage contracts entered into with leverage customers, and must at all times also maintain cover of at least 90 percent of the amount of physical commodities subject to open short leverage contracts entered into with leverage customers..."
Time will tell if this guy's analysis of law is correct, but at least he's actually quoting the law/regulation
I searched for posts with lawyer and cftc & found nothing so I hope this is not a duplicate
I've written before that one valid refutation of Butler could be on his claim that shorts must have good reason to believe they could cover (deliver against) their shorts.
Having no knowledge of US law I did not know how to quote the law myself, or even find it.
http://news.silverseek.com/SilverSeek/1212764222.php
"...(a)(1) Each leverage transaction merchant must at all times maintain cover of at least 90 percent of the amount of physical commodities subject to open long leverage contracts entered into with leverage customers, and must at all times also maintain cover of at least 90 percent of the amount of physical commodities subject to open short leverage contracts entered into with leverage customers..."
Time will tell if this guy's analysis of law is correct, but at least he's actually quoting the law/regulation
I searched for posts with lawyer and cftc & found nothing so I hope this is not a duplicate
Comment