Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

More Homeowners Consider Taking in Boarders

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • More Homeowners Consider Taking in Boarders

    sign of the times:





    More Homeowners Consider Taking in Boarders



    BALTIMORE — When Barbara Terry fell behind on her mortgage payments earlier this year, she did the previously unthinkable. Through a local housing organization, she and her daughter, Imani, 9, rented part of their single-family house to a stranger.
    “I had to do something,” said Miss Terry, 46, who helps formerly homeless people move into new housing. “I said, I am not going to lose this house. Thinking about having a stranger was not a pleasant thought. I have a daughter. But the positive part was that I needed extra help, and I wanted to help someone.”
    With residential mortgage foreclosures still on the rise, more homeowners nationwide are considering Miss Terry’s choice: whether to take in a boarder to keep their homes. Modest but growing numbers are turning to agencies nationwide like the St. Ambrose Housing Aid Center Homesharing Program in Baltimore, which screen boarders to find appropriate matches and relieve some of the fear of strangers.
    “We’re seeing greater numbers of marginal people,” said Kirby Dunn, executive director of HomeShare Vermont, one of several hundred programs around the country that have been formed since the 1980’s to help elderly or disabled homeowners exchange spare rooms for income or, more often, help around the house, but now being pressed to meet different needs.
    “Historically,” Ms. Dunn said, “the people who come to us have been looking for someone to provide services in the home. But now, money is the bigger issue for folks. There’s definitely an increase in people looking for a revenue stream.”
    etc

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/16/us/16share.html?hp

  • #2
    Re: More Homeowners Consider Taking in Boarders

    shocking. who could have known?

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: More Homeowners Consider Taking in Boarders

      Yes, and maybe rubbing elbows with a few "disadvantaged" people will impart a trace of compassion to these homeowners, many of whom approached that ownership thingy during the best of times with the most steely and self-regarding of "upwardly mobile" instincts. And no, this is not a silly Hansel and Gretel morality fable - but there is more than a grain of practical truth in it: from modesty springs financial wisdom, as well as wisdom in life generally. What an earth shattering insight.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: More Homeowners Consider Taking in Boarders

        Lukester, while I think you make a valid point my guess (and only a guess) is that this is likely lower middle class and not McMansion yuppies because "OMG I could like, never let a homeless person stay with me"

        :p

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: More Homeowners Consider Taking in Boarders

          My Grandmother usually had 2 boarders in her 'spare' bedrooms, grad students from SU.

          (Love the 'shopkeeper' moralizing on these posts. Classic)

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: More Homeowners Consider Taking in Boarders

            Originally posted by don View Post
            My Grandmother usually had 2 boarders in her 'spare' bedrooms, grad students from SU. (Love the 'shopkeeper' moralizing on these posts. Classic)
            Yes Don, if I understand your comment above, you are remarking on the dreary propensity for the petit bourgeoisie to inevitably "moralize" capitalisms "reversals of fortune"?

            If that is indeed your point, you are proferring it to someone who does not indulge the smallest trace of moralistic sentimentality. But your reaction is itself telling. Apparently what we have here is the "classic propensity" for any devotee of "creative capitalism" to regard the slightest mention to mutations in human/ethical responses to economic adversity as "shopkeeper moralizing".

            That might be a valid point if you permitted yourself every once in a while to venture even infinitesimally into contemplating the human quotient in the entire bubbles/greed phenomenon. But my guess, from the alacrity and glibness of your "shopkeeper moralism" characterization, is that you regard the world somewhat uncritically as best being served by "unfettered free market" principles.

            If so, your viewpoint is itself a spaghetti ball of logical contradictions, insofar as it is precisely "unfettered free market" speculation by the general public which created this popped bubble in the first place. I come from a family of Democrats, and long ago drifted away from their views to become the "black sheep" in my family as a conservative - but I am a far cry from the variety of intellectually slack or reflexive conservative who regards "free markets" as a panacea with magical ability to resolve all socio-economic problems.

            If your "shopkeeper moralizing" comment was addressed to me, be advised I've just dumped it in the dispose-all. It's a glib, superficial representation of the issues touched on by this thread's topic. I also object personally to being characterized as a dim-witted little "shopkeeper moralist" as in fact I tend to dislike moralizing in all it's forms. There is something at work here in socio-economic terms which your cardboard adherence to uncritical free-market reverence seems unable to grasp.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: More Homeowners Consider Taking in Boarders

              Global Guerrilla Stocks Master

              Another remarkable thing about these posts is how often a passionate, often vitriolic response is triggered on the thinnest of evidence. Regardless of the gross inaccuracy and wild suppositions, the responding rants are invariably illustrative of the responding author's worldview, such as it is.

              Human nature, you gotta love it. It's the only one we got.
              Grandma

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: More Homeowners Consider Taking in Boarders

                Originally posted by don View Post
                ... vitriolic response ... thinnest of evidence. ... gross inaccuracy ... wild suppositions ... responding rants ...
                Yes Don - I'll take your objection at face value, as I am always glad to do if someone claims I have misunderstood them. You can even have my sincere apologies for any "misunderstanding". Although methinks, it is a trifle disingenuous as an objection on your part. Try phrasing your critiques more opaquely in future, in order to disclaim them more handily.

                Originally posted by don View Post
                My Grandmother usually had 2 boarders in her 'spare' bedrooms, grad students from SU. (Love the 'shopkeeper' moralizing on these posts. Classic)

                Comment

                Working...
                X