Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

US faces global funding crisis

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • US faces global funding crisis

    US faces global funding crisis, warns Merrill Lynch

    The US Treasury may have just days to act before foreign patience snaps, writes Ambrose Evans-Pritchard

    Merrill Lynch has warned that the United States could face a foreign "financing crisis" within months as the full consequences of the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac mortgage debacle spread through the world.


    Draining away: The US may struggle to plug its capital gap
    The country depends on Asian, Russian and Middle Eastern investors to fund much of its $700bn (£350bn) current account deficit, leaving it far more vulnerable to a collapse of confidence than Japan in the early 1990s after the Nikkei bubble burst. Britain and other Anglo-Saxon deficit states could face a similar retreat by foreign investors.

    "Japan was able to cut its interest rates to zero," said Alex Patelis, Merrill's head of international economics.

    "It would be very difficult for the US to do this. Foreigners will not be willing to supply the capital. Nobody knows where the limit lies."

    Brian Bethune, chief financial economist at Global Insight, said the US Treasury had two or three days to put real money behind its rescue plan for Fannie and Freddie or face a dangerous crisis that could spiral out of control.

    "This is not the time for policy-makers to underestimate, once again, the systemic risks to the financial system and the huge damage this would impose on the economy. Bold, aggressive action is needed, and needed now," he said.

    Mr Bethune said the Treasury would have to inject up $20bn in fresh capital. This in turn might draw in a further $20bn in private money. Funds on this scale would be enough to see the two agencies through any scenario short of a meltdown in the US prime property market.

    He said concerns about "moral hazard" - stoked by hard-line free-marketeers at the White House and vocal parts of the US media - were holding up a solution. "We can't dither. The markets can be brutal. We have to break the chain of contagion before confidence is destroyed."

    Fannie and Freddie - the world's two biggest financial institutions - make up almost half the $12 trillion US mortgage industry. But that understates their vital importance at this juncture. They are now serving as lender of last resort to the housing market, providing 80pc of all new home loans.

    Roughly $1.5 trillion of Fannie and Freddie AAA-rated debt - as well as other US "government-sponsored enterprises" - is now in foreign hands. The great unknown is whether foreign patience will snap as losses mount and the dollar slides.

    Hiroshi Watanabe, Japan's chief regulator, rattled the markets yesterday when he urged Japanese banks and life insurance companies to treat US agency debt with caution. The two sets of institutions hold an estimated $56bn of these bonds. Mitsubishi UFJ holds $3bn. Nippon Life has $2.5bn.

    But the lion's share is held by the central banks of China, Russia and petro-powers. These countries could all too easily precipitate a run on the dollar in the current climate and bring the United States to its knees, should they decide that it is in their strategic interest to do so.

    Mr Patelis said it was unlikely that any would want to trigger a fire-sale by dumping their holdings on the market. Instead, they will probably accumulate US and Anglo-Saxon debt at a slower rate. That alone will be enough to leave deficit countries struggling to plug the capital gap. "I don't see how the current situation can continue beyond six months," he said.

    Merrill Lynch said foreign governments had added $241bn of US agency debt over the past year alone as their foreign reserves exploded, accounting for a third of total financing for the US current account deficit. (They now own $985bn in all.) By most estimates, China holds around $400bn, Russia $150bn and Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states at least $200bn.

    Global inflation is now intruding with a vengeance as well. Much of Asia is having to raise rates aggressively, drawing capital away from North America. This may push up yields on US Treasuries and bonds, tightening the credit screw at a time when the US is already mired in slump.

    Russia's deputy finance minister, Dmitry Pankin, said the collapse in the share prices of Fannie and Freddie over the past week was irrelevant because their debt has been effectively guaranteed by the US government under the rescue package.

    "We don't see a reason to change anything because the rating of the debt of those agencies hasn't changed," he said.

    Foreign policy experts doubt that the picture is so simple. Russia is likely to use its $530bn reserves as an implicit bargaining chip in high-stakes diplomacy, perhaps to discourage the US from extending Nato membership to the Ukraine and Georgia.

    Vladimir Putin, now Russia's premier, has stated repeatedly that his country is engaged in a new Cold War with the United States. It is clear that Moscow would relish any chance to humiliate the United States, provided the costs of doing so were not too high for Russia itself.

    China is regarded as a more reliable partner, with a greater desire for global stability. Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson has intimate relations with the Chinese elite, dating from his days at Goldman Sachs when he visited the country over 70 times.

    Brad Setser, from the US Council on Foreign Relations, said the Chinese have a stake in upholding Fannie and Freddie, not least to ensure that their loans are "honoured on time and in full".

    David Bloom, currency chief at HSBC, said fears that regional banks could start toppling after the Fed takeover of IndyMac last week were now the biggest threat to the dollar.

    "We have a pure dollar sell-off," he said. "It's a hating competition: at the moment the markets hate the dollar more than they hate the euro, even though German's ZEW confidence indicator was absolutely atrocious."

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/mai...cusdebt116.xml

  • #2
    Re: US faces global funding crisis

    Maybe I am misunderstanding something, but this article says $20 billion in fresh capital is needed. If the US government injects that $20B, doesn't that translate into an increase of the federal debt of only $20B?

    That seems inconsistent with folks saying the national debt has just doubled?
    I don't get it. It seems to me, the amount that the federal debt increased by, depends on how many mortgages will eventually be under water (most likley, not all $5.2 trillion).

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: US faces global funding crisis

      love the rogers man, but he's a nut... a good nut, but a nut. if he weren't rich, everyone would say he's nuts and stop interviewing him. they stopped interviewing ted turner, even if he is rich as ****, because he's a left wing nut and says things that make ya go... whuh the...?

      2x national debt? nuts. the liability for fanny and freddy were always there. that's how socialism works. socialism is all about who gets the gov't $$$. here, the banks #1 and the people #2. in norway, the oil companies #1 and the people #2. thing is, norway has a lot of oil. the usa is running out of bank paper.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: US faces global funding crisis

        Yes, Rogers was indeed one of those folks talking about the doubling of the national debt due to Fannie/Freddie. I also get a kick out of him; have read a few of his books. Often (unfortunately not always), he seems to have intelligent and deep perspective. Its kind of amazing to me that he would mis-analyze the situation so wrongly. I guess he must have an amazingly accurate gut instinct that lets him getaway without knowing all the facts and details....

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: US faces global funding crisis

          $20 billion? Bill gates, Warren buffet, and the Walmart family can come up with it.

          The US is rich, just place a one-time 20% wealth tax on Americans with more than $10 million net worth, all the problems is solved!

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: US faces global funding crisis

            Originally posted by metalman View Post
            love the rogers man, but he's a nut... a good nut, but a nut. if he weren't rich, everyone would say he's nuts and stop interviewing him. they stopped interviewing ted turner, even if he is rich as ****, because he's a left wing nut and says things that make ya go... whuh the...?

            2x national debt? nuts. the liability for fanny and freddy were always there. that's how socialism works. socialism is all about who gets the gov't $$$. here, the banks #1 and the people #2. in norway, the oil companies #1 and the people #2. thing is, norway has a lot of oil. the usa is running out of bank paper.
            I just saw a currency specialist on Bloomberg say he liked the Norwegian currency. Just a little note of warning: our property bubble is even bigger than the US (>250% price increase from through to peak). Our debt-to-income ratio and debt-to-GDP ratio is even higher than the US and even the UK.

            However, the government has money steaming out of every orifice because of oil. Too bad the debt slaves don't. Stay out of Norwegian banks and property. Media here now routinely use the word "debt slaves" and "property crash". This is deja vu all over again. Stiglitz and others has called the Scandinavian financial collapse 1987-92 one of the worst financial disasters post-WW2.

            The Norwegian SWF, though huge, will last for about five years of pension entitlements at current valuations, not counting any horrendous hit to their investments. They lost $20 billion in one month alone this spring - enough to fund five Olympic Games (in Tromso, 2018) or high-speed rail across most of Norway (rail infrastructure is aging).

            The saying is "public riches, private poverty". Plus, we only have 0.5 acres of arable land per inhabitant. If oil slumps, all bets are off... So Norway is good, for the moment. But be careful.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: US faces global funding crisis

              Originally posted by gobears View Post
              Maybe I am misunderstanding something, but this article says $20 billion in fresh capital is needed. If the US government injects that $20B, doesn't that translate into an increase of the federal debt of only $20B?

              That seems inconsistent with folks saying the national debt has just doubled?
              I don't get it. It seems to me, the amount that the federal debt increased by, depends on how many mortgages will eventually be under water (most likley, not all $5.2 trillion).
              FNM & FRE own or guarantee 5,300bn in mortgages. If the federal government explicitly assumes those liabilities (loans/bonds + contingent liabilities), the national debt roughly doubles, but of course, the government would assume all the assets as well. They have not done this yet. As metalman points out, we sorta always knew the government would backstop FNM & FRE.

              The article is suggesting that if the government and private parties inject ~40bn of capital, that should be enough to cover reasonably expected further writedowns. Of course, many iTulipers may anticipate that FNM & FRE will burn right through a capital injection of that size.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: US faces global funding crisis

                Originally posted by moonshot View Post
                FNM & FRE own or guarantee 5,300bn in mortgages. If the federal government explicitly assumes those liabilities (loans/bonds + contingent liabilities), the national debt roughly doubles, but of course, the government would assume all the assets as well. They have not done this yet. As metalman points out, we sorta always knew the government would backstop FNM & FRE.

                The article is suggesting that if the government and private parties inject ~40bn of capital, that should be enough to cover reasonably expected further writedowns. Of course, many iTulipers may anticipate that FNM & FRE will burn right through a capital injection of that size.
                I don't see how the national debt "doubles" as Jim Rogers and others contend. Is it expected that the default rate on $5.3T of mortgages outstanding will be 100%? Even in these perilous times that would be an absurd assumption.

                $40B may be enough new capital if those that provide it are FOHs (Friends of Hank). You can be absolutely certain that any new private capital injection will be on terms that is secured ahead of current equity and bond holders of Fannie and Freddie. They will want to control the assets with the least capital exposure. And Treasury and the Fed are so damned frightened they will make that happen. So my cynical conclusion is that whoever puts up a small amount of capital now has an excellent shot at walking away with the whole Kahuna...once the bond and equity owner initiated lawsuits have been lost because the judge [correctly] rules that there was nothing in the "contract" to protect existing investors.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: US faces global funding crisis

                  GRG,

                  Sometimes it is the case that a business is both undercapitalized and undervalued.

                  While the GSEs certainly are undercapitalized, are they really undervalued?

                  I agree that there are certainly positive assets in them; the question I would have is how would a controlling entity separate out the 'good' mortgages from the 'bad' mortgages?

                  Sure, one line might be the subprime+Alt-A+Option ARM vs. all the rest, but I think it is still a little too early to be able to push the Alt-A/Option ARM takeover down the public's throat.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: US faces global funding crisis

                    Originally posted by GRG55 View Post
                    I don't see how the national debt "doubles" as Jim Rogers and others contend. Is it expected that the default rate on $5.3T of mortgages outstanding will be 100%? Even in these perilous times that would be an absurd assumption.
                    Those saying the debt doubles simply aren't mentioning the asset side - i.e., that the government would get all of FNE/FRE's assets. So adding 5.3Tn of debt doesn't cost the taxpayers 5.3Tn.

                    IIRC, the actual debt of FNM/FRE is ~1.5Tn, the rest are contingent liabilities - i.e., the guarantees they provided on mortgages.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X