Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Drugs Grab Spotlight in Broadcom Case

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Drugs Grab Spotlight in Broadcom Case

    Drugs Grab Spotlight in Broadcom Case
    June 6, 2008 (MARK MAREMONT and JUSTIN SCHECK - Wall Street Journal)

    In a separate four-count indictment against Mr. Nicholas alone, prosecutors allege that the former Broadcom chief engaged in a pattern of drug use and abuse over a nearly seven-year period. The charges against him include conspiracy to distribute Ecstasy, cocaine and methamphetamine.

    Among the more sensational charges is that Mr. Nicholas spiked the drinks of Broadcom customers and others with drugs without their knowledge. Although the indictment doesn't identify any such persons by name, it cites an early 2000 incident in New Orleans at which the Broadcom chief allegedly used Ecstasy, also known as MDMA, to spike the drink of a "technology executive."

    Prosecutors also allege that Mr. Nicholas in 2001 directed a Broadcom employee to pay a drug courier between $5,000 and $10,000 in cash in the lobby of Broadcom's headquarters. The same year, they say, marijuana smoke aboard Mr. Nicholas's private plane was so thick during a trip to Las Vegas that the pilot had to put on an oxygen mask.

    In 2002, the indictment alleges, Mr. Nicholas had Broadcom pay $1 million to a former employee and his attorney in a settlement that contractually prevented the former employee from "speaking about defendant Nicholas's unlawful narcotics activities."

    Federal prosecutors began investigating allegations of drug use by Mr. Nicholas last year, after a former personal assistant, Kenji Kato, sued Mr. Nicholas for back wages and accused him of hiring prostitutes and spending large sums on drugs. Mr. Kato's lawyer said Thursday the case is pending. Many of the specific drug-related allegations in the criminal indictment closely mirror charges in Mr. Kato's civil complaint.


    AntiSpin: Here at iTulip we have an occasional 4PM beer or two on Fridays, but no meth, coke, pot, Ecstasy or prostitutes. Sorry.

    The story reminds us that during bubble boom times people get carried away, but that in the bust times that follow they can get carried away further.



    Drug use that starts off at the bubble peak as party fuel continues as pain relief during the bust. Will the drug habits of the Mortgage Monsters picked up during the mortgage lending party days could similarly morph?
    Last edited by FRED; June 07, 2008, 10:37 AM.
    Ed.

  • #2
    Re: Drugs Grab Spotlight in Broadcom Case

    Fred,

    Sorry, but I'm quite familiar with BRCM.

    All of that was happening long before the NASDAQ crash...

    BRCM does definitely make some good stuff, but culturally they are very Enron-esque.

    Think of an engineering company run like a Wall Street trading firm: spend big money hiring the best engineering, work them like dogs, but treat them like kings. The Enron part also comes from their inventive financial strategies...apparently much too inventive.

    I don't think what we're seeing dragged out into full public view is so much different than happened in the go-go junk bond era, etc etc.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Drugs Grab Spotlight in Broadcom Case

      Originally posted by FRED View Post
      AntiSpin: Here at iTulip we have an occasional 4PM beer or two on Fridays...
      Fittingly restrained behaviour from the prime advocates of the [economically] more responsible NND era, I would think...;)

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Drugs Grab Spotlight in Broadcom Case

        Originally posted by FRED View Post




        They're gonna have to invent some new drugs after the financial tsumnami thats coming hits in full force. I'd love to see a graph of that. Crack, Special K and meth are just not going be up to it.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Drugs Grab Spotlight in Broadcom Case

          Originally posted by c1ue View Post
          Fred,

          Sorry, but I'm quite familiar with BRCM.

          All of that was happening long before the NASDAQ crash...

          BRCM does definitely make some good stuff, but culturally they are very Enron-esque.

          Think of an engineering company run like a Wall Street trading firm: spend big money hiring the best engineering, work them like dogs, but treat them like kings. The Enron part also comes from their inventive financial strategies...apparently much too inventive.

          I don't think what we're seeing dragged out into full public view is so much different than happened in the go-go junk bond era, etc etc.
          Point of the graph, perhaps not clear: the drug use starts off during the bubble peak as party fuel continues as pain relief during the bust. The drug habits of the Mortgage Monsters picked up during the mortgage lending party days could similarly morph.
          Ed.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Drugs Grab Spotlight in Broadcom Case

            Originally posted by FRED View Post
            AntiSpin: Here at iTulip we have an occasional 4PM beer or two on Fridays...
            Budweiser?

            What would be the official iTulip response to this [predictable] behaviour? I'm waiting for Lou Dobbs to explain the national security angle for beer companies. The USA is becoming indistinguishable from France in some respects...;)

            Are US lawmakers going to allow any of those foreign held US bonars back into the country to buy anything other than failing US banks?

            Didn't think so. :p
            Lawmakers vow to fight InBev-Anheuser deal

            Wed Jun 18, 2008 9:36pm EDT
            By Rachelle Younglai
            WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Some U.S. lawmakers ramped up their effort to thwart Belgian brewer InBev NV's $46.3 billion offer for Anheuser-Busch Cos, saying on Wednesday that it would lead to U.S. job losses and destroy an American icon.

            After meeting with InBev's chief executive, Sen. Christopher Bond, a Republican, issued a statement saying, "My Missouri constituents say, 'This Bud's not for you'."...

            http://www.reuters.com/article/reute...46024020080619

            Comment

            Working...
            X