Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

chart of the week

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • chart of the week





    http://wallstreetexaminer.com/blogs/...1652#more-1652

  • #2
    Re: chart of the week

    Great chart, thanks. Nice "recovery" since 2000, isn't it.
    Ed.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: chart of the week

      Originally posted by FRED View Post
      Great chart, thanks. Nice "recovery" since 2000, isn't it.
      It's just "monetary units" running around looking for a home. Nothing special happening here... :rolleyes:

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: chart of the week

        Oil has outpaced gold by a wide margin in the past 12 months. The expansion of monetary units may be the primary reason all commodities are able to rise, but it's perceived "needs" and "wants" that determine which sectors (now commodities), and which items within a sector, all that money flows through at any given moment.

        I also wonder if the marked difference between wheat and corn is indeed an indication of the ethanol fuel distortion?


        Oil (Blue)

        Gold Spot (Orange)

        Corn Spot (Yellow)

        Wheat Spot (Red)

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: chart of the week

          Another chart or two to make you want to go hmmm...






          http://www.NowAndTheFuture.com

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: chart of the week

            it's worth pondering the fact that the graph shows a mean value, hidden behind which is a distribution representing the whole population. each point of increase must correspond to some part of the population maxing out their income and going into negative cash flow.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: chart of the week

              Gentlemen,

              What do you think about one of Mauldin's latest arguments - that there is a sector rotation going on which is leading to commodity prices increasing?

              I think that's a load of bull, but still an interesting concept.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: chart of the week

                Originally posted by c1ue View Post
                Gentlemen,

                What do you think about one of Mauldin's latest arguments - that there is a sector rotation going on which is leading to commodity prices increasing?

                I think that's a load of bull, but still an interesting concept.
                Disagree. This image was created for next week's commentary to provide a context for our explanation of what we think is happening.



                As inflation risk increased 2001 to 2006 due to post bubble reflation, money flowed into commodities. When the debt deflation cycle (aka "credit crunch") started Q2 2007, even more money into commodities poured out of high risk debt to hedge the additional inflation risk created by central bank bailouts. Money also poured into sovereign bonds to escape default risk in corporate and agency.

                As the debt deflation progresses, investors will be increasingly challenged to hide from inflation and default risk. If, as we expect, the policy of dollar depreciation is followed to counter the disinflationary monetary impact of debt deflation, the result will continue to be net inflationary.

                We ask, which raft do we want to be in? Full report next week.
                Ed.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: chart of the week

                  i think you need another raft for currencies to do the full analysis.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: chart of the week

                    Originally posted by jk View Post
                    i think you need another raft for currencies to do the full analysis.
                    But currencies are not an asset class.
                    Ed.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: chart of the week

                      Originally posted by FRED View Post
                      But currencies are not an asset class.
                      i thought gold was the 4th currency. and if the 4th currency is an asset worthy of analysis, why aren't the 2nd and 3rd and 5th?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: chart of the week

                        Originally posted by jk View Post
                        i thought gold was the 4th currency. and if the 4th currency is an asset worthy of analysis, why aren't the 2nd and 3rd and 5th?
                        A bond is a fixed income instrument (until the Wall Street magicians tried to turn some of them into stocks... good luck!) and a stock is a stock; wheat is a perishable commodity and nickel is not.

                        Gold is unique in that it is at once a commodity, a store of value, and a means of exchange.
                        "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world. Fiat money in extremis is accepted by nobody. Gold is always accepted."

                        - Alan Greenspan - May 20, 1999


                        Actually, oil is the ultimate form of payment, but it's hard to keep in a safe box.
                        Ed.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: chart of the week

                          Originally posted by FRED View Post
                          Actually, oil is the ultimate form of payment, but it's hard to keep in a safe box.


                          For those that may not know, there's a crude oil mini contract on NYMEX with a 500 barrel quantity (the full contract is 1000 barrels), and contracts go out into 2013 currently.

                          Using no leverage or margin, that's about $63k bonars to buy right now.
                          http://www.NowAndTheFuture.com

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: chart of the week

                            Originally posted by c1ue View Post
                            Gentlemen,

                            What do you think about one of Mauldin's latest arguments - that there is a sector rotation going on which is leading to commodity prices increasing?

                            I think that's a load of bull, but still an interesting concept.
                            Actually that is the crux of one of my long running sparring matches with our beloved Finster, Esq. I do not at all disagree with his point that excess monetary units (bonars or otherwise) are a necessary condition for inflation. But at any given point in time that inflation by no means has to manifest itself as price increases in the commodity complex, and for much of history it has not.

                            For example, from the point that Volcker decided that two recessions was plenty enough on his watch, we had about 15 years of steady US monetary unit inflation with steadily declining nominal commodity prices. The holders of the excess monetary units (surplus to personal or national "basic necessities", as applicable) chose to flow their excess funds through just about any other asset class than commodities - bonds, Japanese equities and real estate, US and European commercial real estate, tech stocks, sovereign debt, and finally global housing [especially in the financial centres].

                            During the decade of the 1990's [long before the property bubble was really evident] buyers of US rental property, as one example, were making a decision to "flee dollars" in favour of an asset that, in their minds, only "went up" with time. That was their observation and, conscious or not, it was a move to protect themselves against the historical depreciation of their monetary unit.

                            Now that inflation and the Fed's famous "inflation expectations" are ratcheting up people are "fleeing dollars" into the so-called "hard(er)" asset classes for perceived additional protection from the ravages of a more rapidly depreciating monetary unit. Sounds like a [secular] sector rotation to me.

                            Originally posted by FRED View Post
                            Actually, oil is the ultimate form of payment, but it's hard to keep in a safe box.
                            Tried that argument on our Shadow Fed Chairman too. Still recovering from the skin grafts after being shot down in flames...

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X