Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Spur economy with public spending? Many say yes

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Spur economy with public spending? Many say yes

    The politicians and the media are even using Old, New Deal phrases to describe the projects in the New, New Deal.

    By Lisa Lambert - Fri. Jan. 25, 2008

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A plan to revive the gasping economy that was unveiled by the White House and lawmakers on Thursday is unlikely to stem mounting pressure for the federal government to immediately increase infrastructure spending.

    While economists warn that efforts to spur the economy with a big dose of public spending may not kick in fast enough to help, state and local officials -- and some influential members of U.S. Congress -- argue it could be one of the best ways to stave off recession.

    "I believe, and I know a lot of mayors agree, that the best way to pump money into the economy in the short-term and get something out of it in the long-term is to finance immediate infrastructure projects that cities and states can't afford," New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg told the U.S. Conference of Mayors on Wednesday.

    Bloomberg said that he and California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and Pennsylvania Governor Edward Rendell had formed a coalition to push for "a new national commitment to infrastructure."

    There are infrastructure projects that could be started by next month, if only the federal government would provide the funds, according to Douglas Palmer, the mayor of Trenton, New Jersey, and president of the mayors' group.

    In a study of possible stimulus tactics released last week, the Congressional Budget Office said infrastructure projects typically take such large amounts of time to put in place that they are not effective as a quick means to stimulate the economy.

    Outside of road resurfacing, there are few projects where money could be spent in three months, CBO Director Peter Orszag told a congressional hearing on Tuesday. Choosing which projects to fund would eat up time, as well, he said.

    Former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin told the mayors' annual meeting on Wednesday that even projects which can be started soon might not be much help to the economy in the near term since infrastructure undertakings often face delays.

    Still, at the meeting the buzz word was "WPA," or the Work Projects Administration that employed Americans to maintain the country's roads and other infrastructure during the Great Depression.

    With city and state budgets stretched from the housing market downturn and the federal government also in economic pain, it will be hard to find money to employ people in a similar manner, Palmer said.

    "We can't borrow our way out of this," he said, adding that private-public partnerships could generate some backing.

    While infrastructure spending was not included in the stimulus package announced by President George W. Bush and House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Thursday, a number of federal legislators have pointed to pending legislation that could quickly propel new spending.

    Sen. Christopher Dodd, a Democrat from Connecticut, and Sen. Chuck Hagel, a Republican from Nebraska, introduced legislation to establish a national infrastructure bank last summer after an interstate highway bridge in Minnesota collapsed in August.

    While that legislative effort had largely stalled, Dodd, chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, said on Wednesday that the legislation was now a priority for Congress.

    At the hearing on Tuesday, Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon said a separate bipartisan bill to issue $50 billion worth of Build America Bonds for transit improvement funding, which he introduced last fall, could be helpful.

    Wyden argued that tax rebates, such as those included in Bush and Pelosi's plan, may take a long time to enter the country's cash flow, as well. The U.S. Treasury has said rebate checks could be mailed within three months of congressional approval of stimulus legislation.
    Lawmakers Urge Spending on Infrastructure, Housing

    Bloomberg, Jan. 23, 2008

    U.S. lawmakers are proposing 1930s- style investments to boost the economy, including public works projects and reviving a New Deal agency to stop housing foreclosures.

    Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Nevada Democrat, today called for a long-term stimulus plan to build roads, utilities, schools and housing. Representative Mark Kirk, an Illinois Republican, and Senator Christopher Dodd, a Connecticut Democrat, urged re-creating a federal agency to help homeowners refinance.

    The proposals are reminiscent of the approach President Franklin Delano Roosevelt took to get the nation through the Great Depression.

    House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer said both parties agree that any item in the stimulus measure must be fast-acting. ``Whatever we do is going to have a 12-month shelf life,'' he said.

    Reid and New York Democratic Senator Charles Schumer said they want to look ahead to the longer term.

    ``We really need a one-two punch to deal with this economy,'' Schumer said.
    and in Canada, Alberta plots C$120 bln in infrastructure spending

    Alberta's government laid out a C$120 billion ($120 billion) plan on Tuesday to build up highways, railways, hospitals, schools and low-income housing to cope with a booming economy and population growth in Canada's biggest oil-producing province.

    Under its 20-year "strategic capital plan," the government of Conservative Premier Ed Stelmach aims to beef up infrastructure in the province of 3.3 million people at an estimated cost of C$6 billion a year.

    [..]

    The infrastructure strategy includes plans to construct new roads and expand heavily used highways such as the one from Edmonton to the oil sands hub of Fort McMurray.

    The government also detailed plans to upgrade its rail links to the United States in efforts to aid exporters.

    However, it said little about the much-discussed concept of high-speed passenger rail service between the major cities of Edmonton and Calgary apart from investigating and planning for "passenger rail options that provide commuter-type services."

    The two-decade plan includes major projects at several hospitals and clinics throughout Alberta, where the population has been projected to increase to 5 million by 2028.

    In addition, the strategy includes expansions of universities, colleges, technical schools as well as affordable housing projects.
    The Phillippines too:

    Philippines Sees $50 Billion Infrastructure Spending (Update1)

    By Luzi Ann Javier

    Jan. 27 (Bloomberg) -- The Philippine government forecasts 2.03 trillion pesos ($50 billion) will be spent building infrastructure such as power plants and roads from 2007 to 2010.

    The government will spend 1.26 billion pesos on projects including water filtration plants, the National Economic Development Authority said in a statement e-mailed today. The private sector will make up the rest of the forecast spending, the agency said.
    Last edited by Slimprofits; February 18, 2008, 01:13 AM.

  • #2
    Re: Spur economy with public spending? Many say yes

    Originally posted by babbittd View Post
    The politicians and the media are even using Old, New Deal phrases to describe the projects in the New, New Deal.

    By Lisa Lambert - Fri. Jan. 25, 2008



    Lawmakers Urge Spending on Infrastructure, Housing



    and in Canada, Alberta plots C$120 bln in infrastructure spending



    The Phillippines too:

    Philippines Sees $50 Billion Infrastructure Spending (Update1)

    By Luzi Ann Javier
    They'd better hurry. From our coming Select analysis:

    Ed.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Spur economy with public spending? Many say yes

      Originally posted by babbittd View Post
      The politicians and the media are even using Old, New Deal phrases to describe the projects in the New, New Deal...

      ...and in Canada, Alberta plots C$120 bln in infrastructure spending

      Alberta's government laid out a C$120 billion ($120 billion) plan on Tuesday to build up highways, railways, hospitals, schools and low-income housing to cope with a booming economy and population growth in Canada's biggest oil-producing province.

      Under its 20-year "strategic capital plan," the government of Conservative Premier Ed Stelmach aims to beef up infrastructure in the province of 3.3 million people at an estimated cost of C$6 billion a year.

      [..]

      The infrastructure strategy includes plans to construct new roads and expand heavily used highways such as the one from Edmonton to the oil sands hub of Fort McMurray.

      The government also detailed plans to upgrade its rail links to the United States in efforts to aid exporters.

      However, it said little about the much-discussed concept of high-speed passenger rail service between the major cities of Edmonton and Calgary apart from investigating and planning for "passenger rail options that provide commuter-type services."

      The two-decade plan includes major projects at several hospitals and clinics throughout Alberta, where the population has been projected to increase to 5 million by 2028.

      In addition, the strategy includes expansions of universities, colleges, technical schools as well as affordable housing projects.




      Yep, everything old is new again. I lived in Alberta in the late '70's during the last boom and in the latter [and craziest] stages of that one all sorts of money was pissed away by the government on studies for a high speed Edmonton-Calgary rail link. Another fun and games project proposed back then was a coal slurry pipeline to pump the stuff over the Rockies to tidewater and onto ships bound for Japan (the "China" of that time?).

      Oh, and then there was the "hospital in every postal code" program, wherein the government bought bagfuls of votes by sprinkling medical buildings and equipment on every little town and hamlet in the realm. Trouble was they simply couldn't find enough doctors and nurses who wanted to move to these remote communities to staff the facilities, so most of them were underused and many partially mothballed, forcing people to continue to drive into the city to seek treatment.

      The definition of "infrastructure" got so distorted that in the blow off stages of the resource revenue boom the government actually funded the installation of artificial greens on rural golf courses, on the basis that it was good for the local economy because it extended the playing season. My golf-playing oil industry coworkers loved it.

      The Conservative Party of Alberta has been in government continuously since 1971. Sort of a "democratic" version of the House of Saud, eh? Not much original thinking going on in Edmonton.

      Ohhh, to be young again...
      Last edited by GRG55; February 18, 2008, 04:21 PM.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Spur economy with public spending? Many say yes

        New Era Dawns for Rail Building

        Wall Street Journal - 02/13/08

        For decades, railroads spent little on expansion, even tore up surplus track and shrank routes. But since 2000 they've spent $10 billion to expand tracks, build freight yards and buy locomotives, and they have $12 billion more in upgrades planned.

        Comment

        Working...
        X