Re: Is Tesla TOAST ?
Even if they do it once, it's choppy. Seems to me like there's a bump in key months, then production sags back down.
Chart looks a lot like they're letting some inventory build up on the lot, a couple hand-steps from finished, then using those to spike the numbers around key dates. I mean, they hit 2,700 the second week in April, dropped down to 1,700 the first week in May after the earnings call, bounced back to 3,500 the next week, the then dropped to 1,400 two weeks later, and now in the first week of June they're back up to 2,600 before the annual shareholder's meeting. Could be wrong and it's all just random chance of the chaos on the line. But it sure is choppy either way...
Frankly, the leeway tech companies get now-a-days already crossed the line into irrational exuberance in my mind. And the fact that any business that markets itself as a tech company has that leeway rub off on it is a bad sign. If juciero were held to the same standards as keurig, that catastrophe never would have happened. I mean, both Kleiner-Perkins (Mary Meeker's shop) and Alphabet (the Google) drove insane amounts of VC money into a $700 wifi-enabled countertop black box that literally squeezed a pouch anyone could squeeze with his/her hands. It's now defunct. But these are 'the smartest' VCs in the business. Theranos was another total black box. 3 or 4 year cash deposits in advance for a car that doesn't exist yet at Tesla sounds more like Reagan telling a joke about Soviets than real life to me. What are the odds this is not the tip of a much deeper iceberg?
Originally posted by GRG55
View Post
Chart looks a lot like they're letting some inventory build up on the lot, a couple hand-steps from finished, then using those to spike the numbers around key dates. I mean, they hit 2,700 the second week in April, dropped down to 1,700 the first week in May after the earnings call, bounced back to 3,500 the next week, the then dropped to 1,400 two weeks later, and now in the first week of June they're back up to 2,600 before the annual shareholder's meeting. Could be wrong and it's all just random chance of the chaos on the line. But it sure is choppy either way...
Frankly, the leeway tech companies get now-a-days already crossed the line into irrational exuberance in my mind. And the fact that any business that markets itself as a tech company has that leeway rub off on it is a bad sign. If juciero were held to the same standards as keurig, that catastrophe never would have happened. I mean, both Kleiner-Perkins (Mary Meeker's shop) and Alphabet (the Google) drove insane amounts of VC money into a $700 wifi-enabled countertop black box that literally squeezed a pouch anyone could squeeze with his/her hands. It's now defunct. But these are 'the smartest' VCs in the business. Theranos was another total black box. 3 or 4 year cash deposits in advance for a car that doesn't exist yet at Tesla sounds more like Reagan telling a joke about Soviets than real life to me. What are the odds this is not the tip of a much deeper iceberg?
Comment