Tweet
Several events occurred since 2017, after the above debate came to a close. The first was when I had ordered my first order of 15 copies for PR purposes, (you need to understand that this debate was set into motion while I was finalising the final book PDF file), and those 15 copies arrived in the Philadelphia UPS depot . . . and promptly disappeared. Someone removed them and the only "someone" that could do that would have been the US government. Again, as I hold deep concerns regarding The Defense Trade Cooperation Treaty, that I believe made the United Kingdom a colony of the United States since 2012, (when I discovered it's existence), I sent another 8 copies to the White House and offered a deal to President Trump; that includes tearing up that treaty, copied that letter to Mrs May then the UK Prime Minister, who kindly posted a letter back to me to acknowledge my concerns. Part of my proposal being the creation of two gravity and energy research institutes, one in the US the other here in the UK. As a part of my deal I removed my book from sale.
The second was a BBC science program about the origins of the universe. One of my proofs regarding the debate I had created was that two lines of force in opposite directions across such as this planet, create a point of equilibrium of the forces at the centre of the planet where the two forces meet, which brings into the debate Newton's third Law, regarding where a force is applied requires an equal and opposite force at that exact point of the application of the original. Where, at that point of equilibrium at the centre of the planet, we have two forces meeting that require an equal and opposite force to counter each force application; at the central point of the meeting of the opposed forces. What I had done was show that a simple demonstration can be delivered using strips of elastic; where if we mark such a strip at that central point, and add equal points either side of the central point, we can observe the elastic stretches away from the central point in both directions towards the point of application of the two forces, the ends of the elastic. Which demonstration shows that gravity at the centre of any such mass object, is towards the surface at the centre while at one and the same time, the origins of the force of gravity at the surface is towards the centre. Additionally, that such a force structure has to also include points, between the surface and the centre, where the forces must again meet to cancel themselves out. I will attache the original paper delivered to the Royal Society. What the BBC program included was a young woman stepping out of the shadows holding a wider strip of elastic with gold stars on the elastic, which she stretched and relaxed a couple of times, and then stepped back into the shadows. That was the BBC giving the clear impression that my paper was stupid, while kindly acknowledging it's existence.
So I then set out to create a better demonstration using a steel spring driving a gear mechanism driving five separate dials; which in turn adds to Hooke's Law, Robert Hooke being the originator which was the origins of the use of a spring as a means to regulate the movement of a timepiece. (I suggest everyone read; The Man Who Knew Too Much). Again this was also sent to the Royal Society. (Indeed, all my drafts of the book since 2003 were deposited there). This again clearly demonstrates that two forces along the same line, cannot pass the point where they meet to form a point of equilibrium of the forces. That these demonstrations show, without doubt, that if gravity at the centre of a mass object is towards the surface at the centre of the mass and towards the centre of a mass at the surface, with additional points where those forces meet within any such mass object between the surface and the centre, then the mass must also have a shell of balanced force within the mass, between the surface and the centre. I calculated the combined forces at the centre of this planet is 197,359,446 G
Very recently the BBC interviewed the Astronomer Royal at 80, where half the interview is all about the 1950 -1960's debate about a steady state universe. https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episod...l-at-80?page=1 where you will discover that the BBC has removed the 59 minute interview and that all other access shows the interview as only 30 minutes long. The BBC has received two copies of my book.
Just over a year ago I repeated my offer to create two gravity and energy research institutes, two weeks later CERN added me to their listing to receive their bi-monthly journal CERN Courier. (I had quoted two of their most senior scientists in my book).
There is reason to believe that my work is being considered for an award of some sort. It remains my belief that I have fully satisfied all requirements for a detailed description of a steady state universe. Then again, my work will completely destroy many scientific careers built upon big bang theory, and thus there is great incentive to never acknowledge it in any way.
Visual Proof of balanced forces in equilbrium.pdf Balanced Force Demonstration 21 10 2019.pdf
The second was a BBC science program about the origins of the universe. One of my proofs regarding the debate I had created was that two lines of force in opposite directions across such as this planet, create a point of equilibrium of the forces at the centre of the planet where the two forces meet, which brings into the debate Newton's third Law, regarding where a force is applied requires an equal and opposite force at that exact point of the application of the original. Where, at that point of equilibrium at the centre of the planet, we have two forces meeting that require an equal and opposite force to counter each force application; at the central point of the meeting of the opposed forces. What I had done was show that a simple demonstration can be delivered using strips of elastic; where if we mark such a strip at that central point, and add equal points either side of the central point, we can observe the elastic stretches away from the central point in both directions towards the point of application of the two forces, the ends of the elastic. Which demonstration shows that gravity at the centre of any such mass object, is towards the surface at the centre while at one and the same time, the origins of the force of gravity at the surface is towards the centre. Additionally, that such a force structure has to also include points, between the surface and the centre, where the forces must again meet to cancel themselves out. I will attache the original paper delivered to the Royal Society. What the BBC program included was a young woman stepping out of the shadows holding a wider strip of elastic with gold stars on the elastic, which she stretched and relaxed a couple of times, and then stepped back into the shadows. That was the BBC giving the clear impression that my paper was stupid, while kindly acknowledging it's existence.
So I then set out to create a better demonstration using a steel spring driving a gear mechanism driving five separate dials; which in turn adds to Hooke's Law, Robert Hooke being the originator which was the origins of the use of a spring as a means to regulate the movement of a timepiece. (I suggest everyone read; The Man Who Knew Too Much). Again this was also sent to the Royal Society. (Indeed, all my drafts of the book since 2003 were deposited there). This again clearly demonstrates that two forces along the same line, cannot pass the point where they meet to form a point of equilibrium of the forces. That these demonstrations show, without doubt, that if gravity at the centre of a mass object is towards the surface at the centre of the mass and towards the centre of a mass at the surface, with additional points where those forces meet within any such mass object between the surface and the centre, then the mass must also have a shell of balanced force within the mass, between the surface and the centre. I calculated the combined forces at the centre of this planet is 197,359,446 G
Very recently the BBC interviewed the Astronomer Royal at 80, where half the interview is all about the 1950 -1960's debate about a steady state universe. https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episod...l-at-80?page=1 where you will discover that the BBC has removed the 59 minute interview and that all other access shows the interview as only 30 minutes long. The BBC has received two copies of my book.
Just over a year ago I repeated my offer to create two gravity and energy research institutes, two weeks later CERN added me to their listing to receive their bi-monthly journal CERN Courier. (I had quoted two of their most senior scientists in my book).
There is reason to believe that my work is being considered for an award of some sort. It remains my belief that I have fully satisfied all requirements for a detailed description of a steady state universe. Then again, my work will completely destroy many scientific careers built upon big bang theory, and thus there is great incentive to never acknowledge it in any way.
Visual Proof of balanced forces in equilbrium.pdf Balanced Force Demonstration 21 10 2019.pdf
Comment