I reviewed a Fed briefing this evening and it reminded me that at this point it is not even information, it’s simply a truism; technology is changing the world faster now than at any previous time and that rate of change continues to increase. In the US, with regard to non-manual employment, those who are unwilling or unable to upgrade their skillset are left behind.
From this report, it seems clear to me that age is not the deciding factor.
This Fed briefing compared the ratio of short term unemployment to long term unemployment in the 2006-2007 period with the same ratio in the latest available period, 2012-2013. We’ve all heard media reports on the hardships felt in the US by the 50+ age group but this breakdown by age does not bear that out. What it shows is that the 65+ group is getting crushed but the 50-64 group is managing the transition better than any other cohort.
The chart with my notes is here:
The report can be found here:
https://research.stlouisfed.org/publ...eat-recession/
For reference, here’s the unemployment broken down by level of education. Clearly education matters.
From this report, it seems clear to me that age is not the deciding factor.
This Fed briefing compared the ratio of short term unemployment to long term unemployment in the 2006-2007 period with the same ratio in the latest available period, 2012-2013. We’ve all heard media reports on the hardships felt in the US by the 50+ age group but this breakdown by age does not bear that out. What it shows is that the 65+ group is getting crushed but the 50-64 group is managing the transition better than any other cohort.
The chart with my notes is here:
The report can be found here:
https://research.stlouisfed.org/publ...eat-recession/
For reference, here’s the unemployment broken down by level of education. Clearly education matters.
Comment