Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The End Of Car Ownership

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The End Of Car Ownership

    HENRY FORD WAS A smart guy but he never did the math when he decided to put every American household on wheels.

    A century after the Model T, the world has a problem with cars. The U.S. and China will consume about 40 million light vehicles in 2015, according to IHS. Globally, we’re on track to hit 100 million vehicles in 2020.

    That’s not a lot of cars. That’s an ocean of cars, an inundation, wave after wave breaking on the shores of the industrialized world. And yet policy makers and common folk alike have been powerless against the siren song of the automobile. Even in the most car-blighted burg in the world, the toxic parking lot they call Beijing, the appetite for the automobile—as status item, as luxury, as totem of personal mastery in a fragile postcolonial mind-set—is driving millions more into its smoggy embrace, despite limits on ownership and the government’s rising alarm.


    The absurdity of our century-old, ad hoc approach to mobility is captured in one statistic: The utilization rate of automobiles in the U.S. is about 5%. For the remaining 95% of the time (23 hours), our cars just sit there, a slow, awful cash burn, like condos at the beach.

    But what if, like condos, automobiles could be shared? It’s one of life’s first lessons—how to share toys, parents, rooms, feelings. But as little consumers grow into adults, they forget the joys of selflessness. That’s about to change. And I don’t mean the collaborative consumerism we see around us—peer-to-peer transportation like Uber—which is symbolic and transitional, lasting only until automation happens, at which point we can get rid of the wetware. And by wetware, I mean us.

    Within a generation, automobiles will be endowed with what’s known as Level 4 autonomy—full self-driving artificial intelligence for cars—which will not so much change the game as burn down the casino. Autonomy will make it possible for unmanned automobiles to be summoned, via app, to your location. And not just any passing tramp steamer, but exactly the vehicle you need for the occasion, cleaned and fueled, for as little or as long as you need (offers may vary in your state). When you’re done—poof!—it will go away.

    You don’t pay for the car. You pay for the miles. And only the miles. It’s a whole new way to fly. Let’s start small. Need a pickup for three weekends a year but don’t want to pay for the other 49? Autonomy can make that happen easily without a visit to the dreaded U-Haul depot. Need a car to take mom to the doctor’s, or fetch a spouse from the airport? A decade hence, major auto makers and smaller players will be at each others’ throats for the privilege of sending consumers vehicles a la carte, for a one-way trip, an afternoon, a weekend, a month. These transactions will move through the glowing bowels of your monthly credit accounts, and you won’t even feel them.

    ‘The utilization rate of automobiles in the U.S. is 5%. The rest of the time, they just sit there like condos at the beach.’


    Americans will look back on pre-autonomy like the age of Casio calculators and DOS prompts. Remember cab drivers? Remember traffic jams? Remember when parents lived in dread that their children would die in a car accident? Death and major injury from traffic accidents will drop drastically. The automobile’s other costs—decreased productivity, fuel burned in uncoordinated traffic—will be swept away. “Beyond the practical benefits, autonomous cars could contribute $1.3 trillion in annual savings to the U.S. economy alone,” wrote Ravi Shanker, a Morgan Stanley analyst covering the U.S. auto business. Global savings? Somewhere in the neighborhood of $5.6 trillion.

    How self-driving cars will get their smarts

    Danny Shapiro was walking around the Frankfurt auto show with a bomb in his valise. The senior director of automotive at Nvidia in Silicon Valley showed it to me: a bristly motherboard about the size of an iPad, known as the Drive PX, that will upend the auto industry. It’s built around two central processors, each as powerful as the fastest supercomputer of a few years ago. According to Shapiro, some version of this technology will give cars Level IV autonomy—the ability to operate independently of humans.
    The Drive PX interprets sensory data and builds a three-dimensional model of everything that’s going on around the car, allowing it to distinguish between, say, an ambulance and a FedEx truck, and respond appropriately.

    “It can read street signs,” Shapiro says, “and detect lane markings, and anticipate when a pedestrian is going to come out onto the road. And when it sees something it doesn’t recognize, it can record that image, and then transmit it to the data center so it can get added to the next software update.”

    The process, called “deep-learning,” is modeled on the human brain. “Think of it as a child learning the vocabulary of a foreign language,” Shapiro says. “As you put more information into the system, it’s going to keep getting smarter and smarter.” –D.N.


    You may be wondering, back here in 2015, if the auto industry is worried about shared mobility. Doesn’t it spell declining sales? It could. But in a mature market like the U.S. turnover will remain fairly stable. What would change is the number of passengers that passed through every vehicle—including a vast untapped market that doesn’t drive today. “Level 4 AV technology, when the vehicle does not require a human driver, would enable transportation for the blind, disabled or those too young to drive,” says the Rand Corporation in a report on the subject. “The benefits for these groups would include independence, reduction in social isolation, and access to essential services.”

    These same benefits would return mobility to millions on the margins, including the elderly, the working poor and those who have lost their driving privileges due to a criminal record. (It’s not hard to see the throughline between autonomy and the hobbling economic effects of mass incarceration.)

    In August 2015, Morgan Stanley nearly doubled its price target for Tesla, to $465 per share, based on an analysis of Tesla’s so-far secret shared-mobility plan. “We view this as a business opportunity,” wrote Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas, “[that could] more than triple the company’s potential revenues by 2029.”
    And, far from funneling consumers into fleets of lustless electric drones, autonomy could have the opposite effect. Immersive-connected consumers will be able to draw from a vast and constantly replenished motor pool of shared vehicles—dune buggies, pickup trucks, German luxury sedans—with little or no notice, a cast of automotive avatars.
    At this point a fair reader might wonder if I have ever been to America. The notion that we as consumers will forgo the awesome pleasures of the automobile—the privilege, the mobility, the identity—to share vehicles is, I grant, unfamiliar.

    But America’s much-sung-about love affair with the automobile has grown cold. Rates of motor-vehicle licensure are already plummeting among young Americans. The obligations and costs of transportation—an average 17% of household budgets—are driving them out of automobility altogether. And enthusiasm for automotive culture is waning too, as the empty seats at Nascar events attest.

    Personal-vehicle ownership isn’t going away. Some people will own and cherish cars. But those people and their cars will be considered classics. Rates of ownership will decline, an artifact of an era of hyperprosperity and reckless glut. Twenty-five years from now, the only people still owning cars will be hobbyists, hot-rodders and flat-earth dissenters. Everyone else will be happy to share.

    http://www.wsj.com/articles/could-se...hip-1448986572

  • #2
    Re: The End Of Car Ownership

    Originally posted by vt View Post
    The absurdity of our century-old, ad hoc approach to mobility is captured in one statistic: The utilization rate of automobiles in the U.S. is about 5%. For the remaining 95% of the time (23 hours), our cars just sit there, a slow, awful cash burn, like condos at the beach.
    This sentence is the real absurdity. It lacks all common sense, learned over a century of car usage. There's not a car on earth you could run 24/7/365 that would last a year. We're talking 200,000mi or so per year on the low end at 24/7 usage. You'd need a weekly oil change, monthly tune-up and break jobs, quarterly new tires, new struts/springs/bearings/plugs/coil/timing belt/water pump/starter/catalytic converter/etc every 6 months, and a new car at the end of the year when the transmission or the engine or whatever gives out.

    Cars don't just sit there like a slow, awful cash burn. They are only good for a couple hundred thousand miles. And that's only recently. Before that, you'd only get six months on the imaginary 24/7 plan with a much tighter maintenance schedule. That's not to mention the fact that there are rush hours. Not that many people are using cars at 3:30am. But at 3:30pm the roads are jammed. This means that no matter how efficient you think 24/7/365 car operation would be, most cars will still sit in driveways off for most of the day, unless we magically become a more nocturnal species over night.

    I mean, how deeply detached from reality and common sense does one have to be to write an article like this with a straight face? This is exactly the type of "new journalism" that makes me roll my eyes. I'm sure Morgan Stanley's desperate to get people on some newfangled rentier program of monthly payments for access to transit. Hell, they'd privatize the NYC subway and charge $1,000 per month to ride if we let them. And maybe we will let them.

    But there's nothing "more efficient" about it. That's not to mention all the freedom you'd give up in this scam. If they ever get to take away your car and force you onto a monthly payment program for access to the driverless short bus, you lose a lot. No more strapping your skis to the top, or smoking your cigarettes in traffic, or taking your dog down the unmarked dirt roads to the sand lot he likes to run around in, or driving up the beach to a bonfire spot, or hauling mulch and wood and whatever around your property, or towing a camper or trailer, or eating take-out, or drinking coffee, or sex in the back seat, or whatever while you drive.

    Now you must subscribe to Google®Uber™Tesla® monthly payment plans for hundreds of dollars per month to ride in a sterile bubble where there's no eating or talking or drinking or smoking or dogs or cats or garbage bags or manure or firewood or anything like that allowed. This is a sterile environment. You must share it with strangers. No talking too loud. No playing music you want. Rules just like the bus. Yuppies. Yuppies everywhere. And these things I suppose they expect to be running 24/7 and dying in about a year?

    Why would anyone pay for this if they had a choice not to? If you really hate driving for your commute, there's probably at least a bus option that's subsidized and cheaper. Are there really that many people who need to be doing things they don't want to drive themselves to at 3am? Hardcore drunks who hold a deep philosophical hated for taxis, maybe?

    This self-driving car stuff really still seems like a very expensive solution begging for a problem to me.

    It's really not that hard or unpleasant to turn a steering wheel, especially since the advent of power steering. And I can already turn on cruise control and set the automatic transmission to drive in a base-model Civic if I'm too lazy to use my feet.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: The End Of Car Ownership

      Originally posted by dcarrigg View Post
      It's really not that hard or unpleasant to turn a steering wheel...
      I sometimes wonder if I'll live to see the end of car culture. As I've admitted before I love cars and appreciate driving any well designed vehicle. I have a mostly electric car, a sports car, a very old temperamental sports car, a camper van and an old muscle car. Only one makes any sense to own but life is not a spreadsheet. As you said, it's not unpleasant to turn a steering wheel.

      Our youngest daughter has in the last year been pursuing English and Western riding. At first I thought, horses? Really? But it didn't take long for me to realize they're sports cars with four legs. As I watch her ride I get the similarities to my love of car culture. As our culture of efficiency moves forward, I think our human need for physical and emotional connection will reach back.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: The End Of Car Ownership

        Self driving and Uber valuations are financial illusions. Why does AVIS pe= 13 and a market cap of only $3.5 Billion? Meanwhile Uber (the unicorn) has a value of how many Billions.....while they own ZERO cars. When the average UBER driver finally figures out that they aren't charging enough to cover replacement of the vehicle (especially if one of those dreaded recession appears). A recession would put the bulk of Uber driver out of business....just my theory and I'm often wrong.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: The End Of Car Ownership

          Originally posted by dcarrigg View Post
          This sentence is the real absurdity. It lacks all common sense.... how deeply detached from reality and common sense does one have to be to write an article like this with a straight face? This is exactly the type of "new journalism" that makes me roll my eyes.....
          +1

          But there's nothing "more efficient" about it. That's not to mention all the freedom you'd give up in this scam. If they ever get to take away your car and force you onto a monthly payment program for access to the driverless short bus, you lose a lot. No more strapping your skis to the top, or smoking your cigarettes in traffic, or taking your dog down the unmarked dirt roads to the sand lot he likes to run around in, or driving up the beach to a bonfire spot, or hauling mulch and wood and whatever around your property, or towing a camper or trailer, or eating take-out, or drinking coffee, or sex in the back seat, or whatever while you drive....
          heh... the ULTIMATE ABSURDITY (s)

          how DO these morons... uhh... i mean... 'big thinker-intellectuals' come up with these 'grand plans' (usually aimed at everybody BUT them, just like the political class)

          Comment

          Working...
          X