'The Chart Du jour' ?

[lektrode]

this one is particularly enlightening, eh?

Chart Of The Day: Wall Street Vs. Main Street——Thanks, Fed!

by David Stockman • September 18, 2015

of particular interest is the dates of certain events - which just might make one think....
Hmmmmmm....

like...
notice when 'main street peaked' - in the late 90's/2000 ?
and why this seemed to work out so well, for certain businesses on a different street?
and how this 'co-incided' with a certain wildly cushy 'retirement benefits package'
and just where that certain .gov retiree, whom, along with his wife 'retired+relocated' to?
(hint: it sure as hell wasnt back to 'the ranch' in some dusty mid/western state, like most before them)
and just whom their friends happen to be and where they worked ?
and how all this has worked out - for some better than others?
like... esp for their friends?

and how in the aftermath of the 2008 elections, where the most inexperienced+unqualified occupant of the whitehouse in US history was put into office by the least inquisitive pre-election media focus in history?

where the media soft-gloved nearly every opportunity to ask WHY this all happened?

and despite voluminously documented evidence that confirms abundant - not to mention criminal - problems with whats occurred since then ??

little or nothing has changed or been 'fixed' ?

and how the revolving door of '.gov service' REALLY works?

hmmmmm....

guess its all just mere co-incidence then - right?

riiiiiiight...

[Woodsman]

Re: 'The Chart Du jour' ?

...guess its all just mere co-incidence then - right?

I love it. The Obama Unified Field Theory. Ever see Wayne Madsen's version?

So who do you think is running him, Lek? The Company? Moscow Centre?

iTuilp, we hardly knew ye.

[vt]

Re: 'The Chart Du jour' ?

10 to the 10th power Lex! A masterpiece

DemPubs are all the same! They just change the actors every four to eight years. One party Govment bot and paid (handsomely) for.

[don]

Re: 'The Chart Du jour' ?

I love it. The Obama Unified Field Theory. Ever see Wayne Madsen's version?

So who do you think is running him, Lek? The Company? Moscow Centre?

iTuilp, we hardly knew ye.

Yea, but brilliantly done, Woody. Has the Agency gone back to hiring Liberal Art Majors? Trotskyists? This harkens back to the good old daze of Abstract Expressionism. Bring on Nabokov! That's what makes Hilary the 'woman' of choice. So divisive, at least initially, maybe now not so much. Trump can't suck up all the oxygen left after her vaporization. I suppose a letdown is inevitable after the brilliance of the 21st century step-and-fetch-it.

[vt]

Re: 'The Chart Du jour' ?

Citing Alex Jones to try to change the subject? That far right nut case

News for the Dem apologists, the CIA has nothing to do with the bizarre foreign policy of your team:





BOTH The Dems and the Pubs are corrupt! Left and right are both crooks Wake up and smell the coffee.

[Woodsman]

Re: 'The Chart Du jour' ?

...Wake up and smell the coffee.

Obviously, you're not a golfer.

[photon555]

Re: 'The Chart Du jour' ?

Citing Alex Jones to try to change the subject? That far right nut case

News for the Dem apologists, the CIA has nothing to do with the bizarre foreign policy of your team:






BOTH The Dems and the Pubs are corrupt! Left and right are both crooks Wake up and smell the coffee.

Please, please, how 'bout some warning if you're going to splash something like that on the screen. Luckily, I already ate, but now I can't find my bottle of eye bleach.

[photon555]

Re: 'The Chart Du jour' ?

Obviously, you're not a golfer.

"Only a sucker gives the sheeple a real choice." some lobbyist somewhere.

[vt]

Re: 'The Chart Du jour' ?

So sorry

The thread starts with a well link supported analysis of corruption, which I simply pointed out was on both sides.

Then outa left field we have paleolithic right wing Alex Jones conspiracy theory with nothing to do with the subject. Strange.

[Woodsman]

Re: 'The Chart Du jour' ?

... nothing to do with the subject. Strange.

Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

[dcarrigg]

Re: 'The Chart Du jour' ?

So sorry

The thread starts with a well link supported analysis of corruption, which I simply pointed out was on both sides.

Then outa left field we have paleolithic right wing Alex Jones conspiracy theory with nothing to do with the subject. Strange.

VT, I think you're misreading Woody. Or maybe I am. But from what it looked like to me, he wasn't going after Lek, just this link, which is completely bogus, and which he related to the infowars conspiracy, because that's how bad that particular link is.

Seriously, read it if you haven't, and tell me it's not awful. Even if you're inclined to believe the absolute worst most sinister and juicy indiscretions color Obama's entire life, the sheer number of factual errors should bring this nonsense into question. (Judges issue warrants, not AGs, for the tamest example).

I mean, that blog post has Obama as a Harvard educated, gay, druggy, communist, Kenyan, black-nationalist, FBI plant, terrorist, Marxist, capitalist, corrupt corporate board member, socialist, anti-semite, anti-american, slum lord, banker shill, architect of the mortgage crisis, criminal conspirator, mafioso, Muslim, anti-British, Iraqi, biotech insider, husband and father of 2, real estate scammer, corrupt lawyer, state senator, operating a long-con to bring Sharia Law to Kenya, city machine politician, passport forger, "Muslim socialist," "black-power communist," birth-certificate forger, corporate outsourcer and raider, US Senator, murderer, etc. etc.

It's just as insane as the Alex Jones bit.

[Woodsman]

Re: 'The Chart Du jour' ?

VT, I think you're misreading Woody...It's just as insane as the Alex Jones bit.

Mark it, Dude!

[lektrode]

Re: 'The Chart Du jour' ?

...

So who do you think is running him, Lek? The Company? Moscow Centre?

....

how in hell would i know woody?
i just find em, i dont vet em.
and you're the guy who was 'on the inside' (and changed teams)

VT, I think you're misreading Woody. Or maybe I am. But from what it looked like to me, he wasn't going after Lek, just this link, which is completely bogus, and which he related to the infowars conspiracy, because that's how bad that particular link is......

but dc - according to his wiki, he did go to harvard - did he not?

and as i've mentioned before, re that link - i stumbled across it one day and 'just happened' to read it - me being the sort who believes in them old saws like: 'where theres smoke, theres usually a fire' and thot to myself how could a 'published author' get away with publishing stuff like this - and i'd agree, it is quite an 'insane' collection of very unflattering stuff - but its also been on his blog since oct2012 - nearly 3 full years now - more than enough time for it to be examined and picked apart by the admin's cheerleaders and apologists - wouldnt you think?

and my observation of the politcal class over the decades has been that the more outlandish, or 'insane' the unflattering stuff is, the more likely theres at least some truth behind it - esp since most of the lamerstream media has shown little interest in focusing on anything other than The Most Flattering stuff they can spin in his favor - if they cant, they simply ignore it (as they have for the most wretchedly obvious corrupt if not purposely inept AG / 'justice' dept in my lifetime - and thats only my obs of the voluminously documented FACTS compiled by org's like PBS, NPR and writers like Matt Taibbi, as interviewed/evidenced by the democracy now piece and its somewhat all-of-sudden focus on the topic - somewhat surprisingly, since it wasnt a bunch of 'bush+rightwing Repubs' that she so typically castigates)

so i have to ask/wonder - how is it a PUBLISHED AUTHOR (even if he's obviously a 'conservative crusader' blogger, according to his facebook tags) can get away with publishing all those 'just-so-happened coincidences' - IF ANY OF IT isnt at least somwhat true - and not have his ass sued off for slander+libel?

i mean at the very least one would or should suspect there likely is more to quite a few of those 'coincidences' than simply the rantings of a 'conservative crusader' - but more importanly - why is it the lamerstream media never seems inclined to dig into any of that very unflattering stuff? (esp since they - esp ms goodman - never seemed to run out of energy to fling mud at bush,cheney+co)

like i said above - it just kinda makes a guy like me (and likely 10's of millions more) say:
Hmmmmmmm, all them 'coincidences' ?
and there's no questions?

and as its been said: 'the appearance of corruption is just as damaging as corruption itself'

never mind when its been VOLUMINOUSLY documented

[Woodsman]

Re: 'The Chart Du jour' ?

how in hell would i know woody?...

It's all a goddamn fake. Like Lenin said, look for the person who will benefit. And you will, uh, you know, you'll, uh, you know what I'm trying to say.

[llanlad2]

Re: 'The Chart Du jour' ?

"Only a sucker gives the sheeple a real choice." some lobbyist somewhere.

“If voting made any difference they wouldn't let us do it.”

― Mark Twain