Light Bulbs To Be Made Illegal
Is it just me, or does anyone else see the irony? This is the same US government that is spending countless billions and thousands of human lives to "bring freedom" to far-flung corners of the globe. But its own citizens will not be free to buy or sell an ordinary incandescent light bulb.
The United States of America, the Land of the Free. R.I.P.
Supposedly, this will save energy. But even that conclusion is flawed. It is based on the premise that an incandescent light bulb is only a few percent efficient. Other lighting sources turn more of the energy that goes into them into light. Therefore, the pseude-scientific bureaucratic reasoning goes, we can use lower wattage bulbs and save energy. But that’s only true if you look just at light output. Because no matter what kind of light you’re using, 100% of that energy is turned into heat. That’s right, during the heating season every watt-hour that goes into your light bulbs offsets an equivalent number of BTUs of heat from your furnace. For this reason, I prefer using incandescents in the winter. Since much electricity is produced from domestic coal, hydropower, or nuclear, that reduces dependence on imported oil and other hydrocarbon fuels.
But our politicians, in their infinite stupidity, are determined to take away my freedom to make a choice. If it were really so important to them to reduce reliance on imported energy, why not tax it more and let the markets sort out the best way to economize?
Oh, no … that would be against the principle of "free trade" …
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...d=aPxA08AwZUfk
Light Bulbs, Gas Changing as U.S. Energy Bill Passes
(Update1)
By Daniel Whitten
Dec. 18 (Bloomberg) -- The light bulbs in almost every U.S. home and the gasoline in many cars will be altered by energy legislation that the U.S. House of Representatives passed today. President George W. Bush plans to sign the bill tomorrow.
…
Companies such as Amsterdam-based Royal Philips Electronics NV, the world's largest light-bulb maker, and GE, seeing the determination by Democrats to act on energy legislation, helped Congress develop the lighting standards that will end the sale of incandescent light bulbs within a decade.
…
Light Bulbs, Gas Changing as U.S. Energy Bill Passes
(Update1)
By Daniel Whitten
Dec. 18 (Bloomberg) -- The light bulbs in almost every U.S. home and the gasoline in many cars will be altered by energy legislation that the U.S. House of Representatives passed today. President George W. Bush plans to sign the bill tomorrow.
…
Companies such as Amsterdam-based Royal Philips Electronics NV, the world's largest light-bulb maker, and GE, seeing the determination by Democrats to act on energy legislation, helped Congress develop the lighting standards that will end the sale of incandescent light bulbs within a decade.
…
Is it just me, or does anyone else see the irony? This is the same US government that is spending countless billions and thousands of human lives to "bring freedom" to far-flung corners of the globe. But its own citizens will not be free to buy or sell an ordinary incandescent light bulb.
The United States of America, the Land of the Free. R.I.P.
Supposedly, this will save energy. But even that conclusion is flawed. It is based on the premise that an incandescent light bulb is only a few percent efficient. Other lighting sources turn more of the energy that goes into them into light. Therefore, the pseude-scientific bureaucratic reasoning goes, we can use lower wattage bulbs and save energy. But that’s only true if you look just at light output. Because no matter what kind of light you’re using, 100% of that energy is turned into heat. That’s right, during the heating season every watt-hour that goes into your light bulbs offsets an equivalent number of BTUs of heat from your furnace. For this reason, I prefer using incandescents in the winter. Since much electricity is produced from domestic coal, hydropower, or nuclear, that reduces dependence on imported oil and other hydrocarbon fuels.
But our politicians, in their infinite stupidity, are determined to take away my freedom to make a choice. If it were really so important to them to reduce reliance on imported energy, why not tax it more and let the markets sort out the best way to economize?
Oh, no … that would be against the principle of "free trade" …
Comment