Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Taibbi-Police in America

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Taibbi-Police in America

    http://www.rollingstone.com/politics...imate-20141205

    The psychic impact of these policies on the massive pool of everyone else in the target neighborhoods is a rising sense of being seriously pissed off. They're tired of being manhandled and searched once a week or more for riding bikes the wrong way down the sidewalk (about 25,000 summonses a year here in New York), smoking in the wrong spot, selling loosies, or just "obstructing pedestrian traffic," a.k.a. walking while black.

    This is exactly what you hear Eric Garner complaining about in the last moments of his life. "Every time you see me, you want to mess with me," he says. "It stops today!"

    This is the part white Middle American news audiences aren't hearing about these stories. News commentators like the New York Post's Bob McManus ("Blame Only the Man Who Tragically Decided to Resist"), predictably in full-on blame-the-victim mode, are telling readers that the mistake made by Eric Garner was resisting the police in a single moment of obstinacy over what admittedly was not a major offense, but a crime nonetheless. McManus writes:

    He was on the street July 17, selling untaxed cigarettes one at a time — which, as inconsequential as it seems, happens to be a crime.

    The press and the people who don't live in these places want you to focus only on the incidents in question. It was technically a crime! Annoying, but he should have complied! His fault for dying – and he was a fat guy with asthma besides!

    But the real issue is almost always the hundreds of police interactions that take place before that single spotlight moment, the countless aggravations large and small that pump up the rage gland over time.

    Over the last three years, while working on a book about the criminal justice gap that ended up being called The Divide, I spent a lot of time with people like Eric Garner. There's a shabby little courthouse at 346 Broadway in lower Manhattan that's set up as the place you go to be sentenced and fined for the kind of ticket Staten Island cops were probably planning on giving Garner.

    I sat in that courtroom over and over again for weeks and listened to the stories. I met one guy, named Andre Finley, who kept showing up to court in an attempt to talk his way into jail as a way out of the $100 fine he'd got for riding a bike on a sidewalk in Bedford-Stuyvesant. He couldn't afford the hundred bucks. It took a year and multiple all-day court visits to clear up.

    I met a woman who had to hire a sitter so she could spend all day in court waiting to be fined for drinking wine on her own front porch. And in the case of a Bed-Stuy bus driver named Andrew Brown, it was that old "obstructing traffic" saw: the same "offense" that first flagged Ferguson police to stop Michael Brown.

    In Andrew's case, police thought the sight of two black men standing in front of a project tower at 1 a.m. was suspicious and stopped them. In reality, Andrew was listening to music on headphones with a friend on his way home after a long shift driving a casino shuttle. When he balked at being stopped, just like Garner balked, cops wrote him up for "obstructing" a street completely empty of pedestrians, and the court demanded 50 bucks for his crime.

  • #2
    Re: Taibbi-Police in America

    Major obstacles stand in the way of meaningful reform.

    Divide and Conquer. The wedge of race has been perfected and proven highly flexible to any legislated 'corrections'. If a fraction of 1% hold all the meaningful power, they have to keep us pre-occupied with something. The Other is a powerful trump card, useful abroad as well.

    The Thin Blue Line. The police are the first line of defense for the above's administrators. Think they want to lose their loyalty? I wouldn't if I had their job, when and if the shit hits the fan.

    Norman Rockwell's American vision, albeit a fantasy, compared to our present reality isn't easy to take.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Taibbi-Police in America

      after finally seeing the exchange tween garner and the cops, must say that was the single most outrageous un-provoked act of excessive force eye have ever...

      the very fact that garner expressed his RIGHT to NOT be assaulted, IMHO should be the grounds for a complete examination of the use of force rules by the cop shops nationwide

      and i'm not typically the sort to say stuff like this - but after watching that confrontation?

      the whole law n order paradigm is severely outa whack (and mostly a function of beltway hogtroff sloppin)

      that said, we wont even get into the beltway/manhattan axis of evil that the lamerstream media is running blocking cover for - by using this event - along with fergusson - as the typical distraction (which is most likely advance work to setup the inner city vote for a white woman: expect the hil'n'bill show to pipe up any day now...)

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Taibbi-Police in America

        My first experience with the excessive militarization of American police came on my first visit to NYC post 9/11.

        What turned out to be Hercules Teams I found to be quite shocking and ridiculous. Here's a stock photo of a nearly identical scene I witnessed:

        https://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2467/3...84e20e289c.jpg

        Prior to 9/11, key points in NYC such as Times Square had considerable police presence and CCTV cameras that made perfect sense for such a high profile high traffic location.

        My first visit post 9/11 and some subtle but quite important changes occurred. The worst of which I could see was the use of these Hercules Teams.

        If you can see the linked photo, I can tell you with absolute fact that even from a far higher immediate threat military SASO(security and stability operations) perspective, the police in the photo are "doing it wrong".

        The threat environment does not call for a kevlar helmet, nor does it call for the wear of a plate carrier rig, unless you are conducting a high risk entry.

        1)Wearing a helmet when interacting with the public is a big no-no as it presents an intimidating barrier between the officer and the public they serve.

        2)Carriage of a rifle/carbine to the front, instead of to the side/rear(unless the threat dictates) is a big no-no presents an intimidating barrier between the officer and the public they serve.

        3)Wearing sunglasses when interacting with the public is a big no-no as it's intimidating for the public they serve and dehumanizes the officer.

        I can completely understand the need(real and perceived) for Police to have the tools they need to do their job. You can still carry your carbine, but it's HOW you carry it.

        You can still carry Kevlar, but you don't have to WEAR it unless needed.

        You can still wear sunglasses, but not when in close proximity with the public you serve.

        If I was their commander/supervisor, I would kick their ass.

        They are not Seal Team 6, they are Police.

        All these things add up to build barriers between the Police and the public they serve.

        -----

        In terms of the Michael Brown saga.....wrong place, wrong time, wrong person, wrong attitude, wrong actions. I have no sympathy for Michael Brown. I believe karma caught up with him.

        -----

        The case of Eric Garner is a tragic one. I don't know what happened before the incident off camera, but I really wonder what's happened to people skills.

        Yup, Eric Garner was a rather big unit and clearly requires caution and care in handling if things cook off. But I think a bit more Zig Zigler and a bit less UFC ground fighting would go a long way.

        Transformational instead of transactional.

        Maybe Eric Garner's cardio health was already such that he was in a very self inflicted vulnerable state. But that's no excuse to put hands on him unless absolutely necessary and justified.

        -----

        I think the odds are exceptionally low right now for the US to have an event that cascades into truly widescale public protest...at least compared to many other countries.

        But you could make some very basic comparisons between Eric Garner and Mohamed Bouazizi in Tunisia that sparked the Tunisian Revolution and Arab Spring.

        From their perspective, they were both frustrated and disenfranchised street vendors who died after interactions with local law enforcement, leading to different levels of public awareness and action.

        The US "forest" isn't as dry as the Tunisian one, but a big enough spark in the right location could certainly cascade into something bigger.

        Comment

        Working...
        X