Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The East is Black

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The East is Black



    At an oil-drilling site in Sudan in 2008, a Chinese employee teaches Sudanese workers to read Chinese characters for “Hello China, we are friends.” CreditHu Qingming/Imaginechina,

    On a trip to Lusaka, Zambia, last year, I kept chasing an energetic and jittery Chinese man, the only staff member of a Chinese mining company willing to talk to me after his firm had been involved in several scandals in which both Chinese and Zambian employees were either killed or injured on the job. Zambia, with its abundant copper ore deposits, is one of the most important investment destinations for China. His English was excellent, and he liked to talk — and talk. After telling me about how much he loved the country and its people, he sometimes went into a rant about how Zambian miners liked drinking and money too much, and did not like to work hard. It was that mentality, he continued, that had caused his company all its troubles (not the workplace-safety and low-pay grievances of which it was accused). But even though the Zambian government had repossessed his company’s mines, this man wasn’t leaving. He was now working as an interpreter for the government.

    I wondered about his family back home, and what they thought of this young man forging his life thousands of miles away. In his extraordinary new book “China’s Second Continent,” Howard W. French delves into the lives of some of the one million-plus Chinese migrants he says are now building careers in Africa. For all the debate about China’s intentions (imperialist or not?) and business practices (corrupt or not?) on the continent, the key piece of the discussion, French argues, has been ignored: the actual lives of those Chinese who have uprooted themselves to settle and work in Africa. Even as China has become the world’s fastest-growing large economy, 10 of the 20 fastest-growing economies between 2013 and 2017 are projected to be in Africa. As French writes, “Bit by bit, these facts have become closely intertwined.”

    The recent Chinese immigrants are the glue holding them together. And the stories French tells are fascinating.

    French’s characters range from the mundane to the outrageous. In Mozambique he spends time with Hao Shengli, a brash agricultural entrepreneur from Henan province whom he calls the Chinese version of the “ugly American.” French, a former New York Times foreign chief in Africa and China, speaks Chinese, pleasantly surprising his subjects with his fluency, and they often allowed him into their homes, businesses and even wedding celebrations. Hao, for instance, is startlingly blunt. The skin of the Mozambicans was so “black” that it made him uncomfortable at first. He tells French: “I didn’t think they were so clever, not so intelligent, and I was looking for an opportunity based on my own capabilities. Can you imagine if I had gone to America or Germany first? The people in those . . . places are too smart.” He went on, “So we had to find backward countries, poor countries that we can lead, places where we can do business, where we can manage things successfully.”

    Still, Hao is not a stand-in for his countrymen across the continent; his story is unique. He distrusts other Chinese businessmen in Mozambique, and so he camped out alone in the countryside, where he bought a swath of land from a local government (angering native residents) to grow lucrative crops, and schemed to hold on to his budding wealth. Hao’s grand plan is to marry off his sons to local women and then put his land in the women’s names for safekeeping from government seizure, creating a miniature Chinese-Mozambican economic dynasty. He moved his two sons from China, and the older one has acquired a live-in girlfriend who cooks and cleans for the men. Hao is one of a number of Chinese farmers targeting empty expanses on the continent; Africa may hold up to 60 percent of the world’s uncultivated arable land.

    Like several of the book’s subjects, Hao subscribes to the idea of chi ku, a Cultural Revolution-era expression that translates to “eat bitter,” or endure hardship. From trailers in the deserts of Mali to outposts on the Namibia-Angola border, Africa’s Chinese frontiersmen and women are setting up homes. They are unafraid of loneliness, boredom, power blackouts and other inconveniences as they try to make their fortunes — with an encouraging push from the Chinese government, which is happy to help with financing. All of those hardships are better, they say, than the rigidity, stiff competition and corruption back home.

    In Senegal’s seaside capital, Dakar, French finds a 26-year-old businesswoman who ended up in West Africa probably as a prostitute (he never asks outright), yet worked her way up into owning a karaoke bar and massage parlor. “Dakar in those early days was really boring. Pretty much everything was lacking here, and I thought even a county seat somewhere in China must be more interesting,” she says. “But when I got back home, there wasn’t much for me to do, so I changed my mind.” When characters like these tell their stories in their own words, “China’s Second Continent” shines. The book’s pace can drag at times, but French is a clear, thoughtful storyteller.

    China is now Africa’s largest trading partner, and it offers loans, grants and development deals without the anticorruption strings favored by the United States and Europe. Yet in most of the countries French travels to, Africans complain about inferior Chinese goods and shoddy infrastructure, like the new roads the Chinese have built. I recently hired a Senegalese carpenter to change the lock of an apartment I was renting in Dakar. He explained the different kinds of locks available at the hardware store. “There are Chinese locks,” he told me. “But I think you should pay more for the best ones.”

    In later chapters, Africans — from government, civil society and ancestral communities — speak about how public officials, engaged in what French calls “gangster capitalism,” are failing to hold Chinese investors accountable. A pervasive lack of transparency has allowed businessmen to export valuable resources like timber illegally, and to bring in an uncapped number of Chinese immigrants (“There are too many of them in their own country, and they are doing this to decongest China,” a Zambian politician complains). Meanwhile, investors are seizing land at bargain prices and extracting minerals. China says its relationship with Africa is “win-win.” The problem is, most African leaders, more interested in profiting from their countries’ resources, haven’t committed to letting their people win, too.

    When I was in Zambia, the government was passing legislation to tax the earnings of its foreign mining investors more efficiently. Whether current officials will be more responsible with that revenue than their predecessors, some of whom allegedly accepted kickbacks worth millions of dollars from Chinese investors, remains to be seen.

    French concludes that Chinese migration to the continent falls within a wider tradition of foreign powers establishing spheres of economic influence in Africa, and he doesn’t doubt that China’s political demands on Africa will grow. This is probably true. But if Africa fails to capitalize on its wealth to the benefit of future generations, it won’t be entirely China’s fault.


    CHINA’S SECOND CONTINENT
    How a Million Migrants Are Building a New Empire in Africa
    By Howard W. French
    285 pp. Alfred A. Knopf. $27.95.


  • #2
    Re: The East is Black

    One fact some may not be aware of is China's very longstanding ties to Africa.

    Chinese ties with Zambia and Tanzania reach back to the 1960's.

    The supposed white versus black war for Rhodesia/Zimbabwe was really a 3 way war amongst the disinterested west(Rhodesian government), the Soviet Union( support for Nkomo's ZIPRA), and China (support for Mugabe's ZANLA).

    Mugabe's ZANLA won.....therefore China won(and the West/Soviet Union lost).....and it is China that has provided the support since 1980 to keep Mugabe in power.

    I've seen the flight boards in Nairobi airport, which helps provide perspective, showing the majority of departures heading to China and majority of arrival coming from China(maybe it was a fluky couple of days, but I doubt it).

    In some respects, I think China's focus on Africa is a "Go West, young man" Horace Greeley/Manifest Destiny for the 21st century with Chinese and Bladerunner-esque characteristics.

    Personally, I think colonialism with Chinese characteristics in Africa...a continent with irrational national boundaries created by European colonial powers....is just going to act as a powerful catalyst for future irregular war and genocide on the African continent as the centres of gravity in African "nations" fight over China's table scraps.

    What will be interesting to see is WHEN China deploys troops on operations in Africa.

    I've seen with my own eyes(in the last decade) a Chinese community burned to the ground by indigenous peoples in the Southwest Pacific, as well as Chinese interests clear cutting teak forests and strip mining fisheries in the same region.

    I've heard recent stories of small numbers of Chinese soldiers actively patrolling around Chinese interests in Zimbabwe.

    I think "gangster capitalism" is a good descriptor. I would also add locust capitalism.

    I would love to see Italian author Roberto Saviano who wrote the book Gomorrah about the organized crime strangehold on Italy write a book about Chinese history and doctrine in Africa.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: The East is Black

      Originally posted by lakedaemonian View Post
      In some respects, I think China's focus on Africa is a "Go West, young man" Horace Greeley/Manifest Destiny for the 21st century with Chinese and Bladerunner-esque characteristics.
      I believe that is exactly China's plan. I wish I could find the link for it but some years ago there was an article in one of the newspapers of note that talked about China's efforts in Africa. The Chinese evidently have the belief that to become a powerful nation, a nation must have a lot of natural resources. The nation lacking natural resources and yet aspiring to imperial power must acquire colonies rich in natural resources. The final line in the news article was a quote from a Chinese person in Africa and I remember it going something along these lines: "We must succeed in Africa. It is our last hope."

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: The East is Black

        Originally posted by Milton Kuo View Post
        I believe that is exactly China's plan. I wish I could find the link for it but some years ago there was an article in one of the newspapers of note that talked about China's efforts in Africa. The Chinese evidently have the belief that to become a powerful nation, a nation must have a lot of natural resources. The nation lacking natural resources and yet aspiring to imperial power must acquire colonies rich in natural resources. The final line in the news article was a quote from a Chinese person in Africa and I remember it going something along these lines: "We must succeed in Africa. It is our last hope."
        Unfortunately, China's ambitions(in particular led by their doctrine of trading/supporting anyone in control of the resources regardless of human rights violations) will likely act as a catalyst to further disrupt Africa's artificial and unstable Colonialism 1.0 national constructs.

        I've read enough by enough people with broad and deep experience in Africa who believe it is inevitable that Africa will face the same turmoil that faced the US, Europe, and Asia on the long journey towards some form of stability….which will likely include a bunch more genocides, civil wars, inter-state wars, etc.

        It has been posited here on this forum that US and EU policy has been one of fomenting instability while claiming the promotion of stability.

        I would think China may be even more likely to promote a similar doctrine.

        Would a stable, secure, and prosperous Africa result in more commodities indigenous to Africa in excess to African continental needs available for export? Or less?

        When it comes to racism, it will be interesting to see how racism at the individual/collective levels could impact on China's foreign policy in Africa.

        Are Chinese less progressive in terms of ethnic equality or is their "inside voice" regarding race simply lost in translation.

        Because the candour in which many Chinese seem to speak regarding race is "interesting".

        Africa is going to be an exciting place in the coming decades.


        *Exploding population
        *encroachment on native species and ecosystems
        *desertification from scorched earth forestry practices
        *Two biggest and most powerful nations(South Africa and Nigeria) are cannibalising themselves in epic nepotism)
        *Colonial boundary instability
        *Nile River conflict potential

        And add the external influences of crony capitalism competing with gangster/locust capitalism

        ----------

        A couple of stats I would like to know is:

        How many Westerners are fluent in African languages and are culturally capable?
        How many Chinese are fluent in African languages and are culturally capable?

        How many of each intend on learning African languages and culture?

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: The East is Black

          then there's the Fashoda factor to consider . . .

          France was clearly expanding in a west to east direction, from French West Africa to French Somaliland, while Britain had expanded in a north-south direction, from Egypt to the Cape. The point where the two axes crossed was the Sudan. Here a small French expedition, under Major Marchand, reached Fashoda, on the Upper Nile, in 1898. This was followed, only two months later, by a much bigger British force under Lord Kitchener. The two leaders did not know whether to sit down and have a drink together or fight. Both claimed Fashoda and the Sudan for their own countries.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: The East is Black

            Originally posted by lakedaemonian View Post
            Unfortunately, China's ambitions(in particular led by their doctrine of trading/supporting anyone in control of the resources regardless of human rights violations) will likely act as a catalyst to further disrupt Africa's artificial and unstable Colonialism 1.0 national constructs.
            You mean to say the Chinese will support any third world tinpot dictator no matter how he craps on his people just to get their mitts on their resources?

            I've read enough by enough people with broad and deep experience in Africa who believe it is inevitable that Africa will face the same turmoil that faced the US, Europe, and Asia on the long journey towards some form of stability….which will likely include a bunch more genocides, civil wars, inter-state wars, etc.
            It better. We're sure investing the coin to make sure it happens.

            It has been posited here on this forum that US and EU policy has been one of fomenting instability while claiming the promotion of stability.
            Uh huh. Just a theory.

            I would think China may be even more likely to promote a similar doctrine.
            In a get there first'est with the most'est, can't beat 'em join 'em sorta way. Still, most of the bombs dropped on people in a given year aren't made by the Chinese, so they still have a ways to go before they can play in the big leagues.

            Would a stable, secure, and prosperous Africa result in more commodities indigenous to Africa in excess to African continental needs available for export? Or less?
            I don't know. There's hasn't been a stable and secure and prosperous Africa since Europeans arrived, so it's really hard to say. They were holding their own for a while.

            "At about 3300 BC, the historical record opens in Northern Africa with the rise of literacy in the Pharaonic civilization of Ancient Egypt. One of the world's earliest and longest-lasting civilizations, the Egyptian state continued, with varying levels of influence over other areas, until 343 BC. Egyptian influence reached deep into modern-day Libya, north to Crete and Canaan, and south to the kingdoms of Aksum and Nubia."
            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Africa#Early_civilizations
            But that was a long time ago. Maybe if you give an example?

            When it comes to racism, it will be interesting to see how racism at the individual/collective levels could impact on China's foreign policy in Africa.
            Yes, they are very racist (and the Koreans I know are incorrigible!). Almost as bad as Englishmen and Americans, but in their defense they haven't traveled as widely until recently and so had fewer options in terms of people available to hate.

            Are Chinese less progressive in terms of ethnic equality or is their "inside voice" regarding race simply lost in translation.
            Hard to say. I wonder, though, would a Chinese person have a better experience of the racist's gaze than a white Englishman or American?

            My guess that in terms of garden variety xenophobia, the average Chinese person is probably on par with the average American southerner or English equivalent of comparable education and socio-economics. Probably about as ugly as as the stuff the Irish and Italian guys used to dish out when I was a kid. Then again, they gave as good as they got.

            In terms of supremacism, it's a mixed bag. The Chinese do seem to have an inferiority complex and that usually comes along with racism, no? Individually, people do the best they can and the best thing you can say for racists and bigots, they tend to keep to themselves. As far as their global hard and soft power, we'll need to give the Chinese and Asian people generally several hundred years of global supremacy. The Europeans and Americans had all that time to put white supremacy to work, after all.

            But like someone posted, their favorite color is green. Europeans and Americans would rather die than give up white supremacy. And they damned sure don't mind going broke for it.

            Because the candour in which many Chinese seem to speak regarding race is "interesting".
            Not like in America or Britain. We've learned to use code.

            Africa is going to be an exciting place in the coming decades.
            Careers are depending on it!

            *Exploding population
            *encroachment on native species and ecosystems
            *desertification from scorched earth forestry practices
            *Two biggest and most powerful nations(South Africa and Nigeria) are cannibalising themselves in epic nepotism)
            *Colonial boundary instability
            *Nile River conflict potential

            And add the external influences of crony capitalism competing with gangster/locust capitalism
            Is this all just the dumb luck, got nothing to do with anything except happenstance, hate it for you dudes, of Africa and Africans? No connection to the ruling paradigm? Nothing to do with how resources are allocated, generally, and the political & economic interests of elites, since say 1500?

            ----------
            A couple of stats I would like to know is:

            How many Westerners are fluent in African languages and are culturally capable?
            Does that include French? Because that's going to skew the numbers.

            How many Chinese are fluent in African languages and are culturally capable?
            I hope it's better than their English, for goodness sake.

            How many of each intend on learning African languages and culture?
            Do they have to learn all 3000 or can they pick a couple? And does that include French?

            Speaking of chaos in Africa, that reminds me of a great book:

            "On February 13 1961, United Nations Ambassador Adlai Stevenson came on the phone. I was alone with the President; his hand went to his head in utter despair, "On, no," I heard him groan. The Ambassador was informing the President of the assassination of Patrice Lumumba of the Congo, an African leader considered a trouble-maker and a leftist by many Americans. But Kennedy's attitude towards black Africa was that many who were considered leftists were in fact nationalists and patriots, anti-West because of years of colonialization, and lured to the siren call of Communism against their will. He felt that Africa presented an opportunity for the West, and, speaking as an American, unhindered by a colonial heritage, he had made friends in Africa and would succeed in gaining the trust of a great many African leaders. The call therefore left him heartbroken, for he knew that the murder would be a prelude to chaos in the mineral-rich and important African country, it was a poignant moment."

            Jacques Lowe, personal photographer to JFK in his "A Time Remembered."
            An easy read and good place to start if you want to learn how one man tried to understand Africa on its own terms and put that into practice is Richard D Mahoney's "JFK: Ordeal in Africa."



            Orwell and JFK, two of my favorite people. In "1984" Orwell wrote that once Ingsoc and Big Brother took control of the world they divided it into three Super-States and the Disputed Territories, over which the Super-States waged continuous war. The people of the Disputed Territories, which includes equatorial Africa, "were expended like so much coal or oil". Their nations were gutted for their "valuable minerals and important vegetable products". Except for the vegetables, Orwell was spot on about the fate of Africa. Its nations have never had a chance to survive on their own without interference.

            And Jack Kennedy was spot on about Africa. Had he been permitted to live and enact his policies for Africa, that continent could have been a competitor to Europe and America. During his fourteen years in Congress - as a Representative and a Senator - JFK developed an African policy that supported individual African nations winning their freedom from colonial powers like Britain, France, Belgium and Portugal. He believed that with American financial and technical support they would be able to eventually stand on their own two feet and repel any future aggressor.

            JFK spoke in Congress opposing even his own party when it came to freedom for Algeria from France and he had a strong desire to see the Congo gain its independence from Belgium. Even in the busy year leading up to his presidency JFK tried to help African movements for independence. When 250 African students had managed to fund-raise enough money to pay their tuitions at American universities, JFK and his family personally and anonymously put up $100,000 to pay their air-fares to America. The USA government had refused to give the students aid.

            But the closest African nation to JFK's heart was the Congo. JFK admired the popular, charismatic prime minister, Patrice Lumumba. But as it would happen to JFK three years later - Lumumba was assassinated. But instead of exploding cigars, they first tried the hit with anthrax in his toothpaste. When that didn't work they fell back on plain old fashion thuggery. Lumumba was kidnapped, imprisoned and brutally beaten first. JFK wasn't even told about Lumumba's death on January 17, 1961 (three days before his inauguration - great timing) until almost a month later, at which time he reacted with total despair. That's the picture used for Mahoney's book, Jack getting the news.
            Last edited by Woodsman; July 14, 2014, 04:31 PM.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: The East is Black

              +1 Woods.

              Chinese in America that weren't virtual slave labor on the railroads (and the wine cellars of Napa) were restricted to laundry - a business that castrated their manhood. No tickee, no washee!

              (Being more a real politics guy than Woodsman, the Chinese, incapable for the foreseeable future of projecting military power, are vulnerable to a resource grab in the Dark Continent - think AFROCOM - so it's always been, so it will always be . . . .)
              Last edited by don; July 15, 2014, 06:24 AM.

              Comment

              Working...
              X