Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

BIS:-Get your smegging rates up!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BIS:-Get your smegging rates up!

    BIS: ultra low interest rates could make global economy permanently unstable

    Bank for International Settlements warns "persistent easing bias" by fiscal, monetary and prudential policymakers has lulled governments "into a false sense of security"

    Mr Borio said policies were needed to "tame the financial cycle" and lean against financial booms rather than just "ease aggressively and persistently during busts" Photo: Alamy






    British Gas Homecare®‎ Enjoy Peace of Mind with 10% off our Homecare range. Rated 4.5/5
    Advertisement





    By Szu Ping Chan

    11:30AM BST 29 Jun 2014

    149 Comments


    Ultra low interest rates and the failure of policy to "lean against" the build-up of financial imbalances are in danger of making the global economy permanently unstable, the Bank for International Settlements has warned.


    In its annual report, the Swiss-based "bank of central banks" spelled out the risks of relying too heavily on monetary policy to stimulate the economy. The BIS warned that central banks including the Bank of England and US Federal Reserve could keep monetary policy loose for too long, with potentially damaging consequences.


    "The prospects for a bumpy exit together with other factors suggest that the predominant risk is that central banks will find themselves behind the curve, exiting too late or too slowly," the BIS said on Sunday.


    It added that a "persistent easing bias" by fiscal, monetary and prudential policymakers had lulled governments "into a false sense of security" that delayed needed consolidation and created a risk that instability could "entrench itself" in the system. "Policy does not lean against the booms but eases aggressively and persistently during busts," the BIS said. "This induces a downward bias in interest rates and an upward bias in debt levels, which in turn makes it hard to raise rates without damaging the economy – a debt trap.


    "Systemic financial crises do not become less frequent or intense, private and public debts continue to grow, the economy fails to climb onto a stronger sustainable path, and monetary and fiscal policies run out of ammunition. Over time, policies lose their effectiveness and may end up fostering the very conditions they seek to prevent."

    Related Articles



    Claudio Borio, the head of the BIS's monetary and economic department, warned that the onset of another financial crisis could trigger a retreat towards protectionism that would "spell the end to the current open global economic order" as we know it. "Focusing our attention on the shorter-term output fluctuations is akin to staring at the ripples on the ocean and losing sight of the more threatening underlying waves" he said.

    The BIS noted that Britain's property market had been "unusually buoyant" and described the recent growth spurts in the UK and US as "somewhat unsettling" and akin to those observed just before financial crashes.

    Mr Borio said policies were needed to "tame the financial cycle" and lean against financial booms rather than just "ease aggressively and persistently during busts".

    The BIS highlighted the importance of clear communication as central banks moved towards tightening monetary policy. Bank of England Governor Mark Carney has said that interest rate increases will be "gradual and limited", and are likely to settle at around 2.5pc.

    However, the BIS report noted that "Taylor Rule" implied rates in the UK showed interest rates should already be around 1.5 percentage points higher than their current level of 0.5pc.

    John Taylor, Stanford economist and namesake of the rule, which presents a straightforward guideline as to how central banks should move interest rates in response to inflation, told the Telegraph that a shift away from "rules-based" policies at the beginning of the 21st century had made policymaking more opaque. He urged central banks to "lay the groundwork" for their return.

    "If the [ interest rate] policy had been different for quite a while I think the economy would be stronger and you wouldn't think about anything but higher interest rates," he said. "Where it is now, you just have to go more slowly.

    "I would not say interest rates should rise this week or this month, but policymakers should get back to a rules based policy, and one where people can see [where] interest rates should be given the economic conditions so they understand how policy works better.

    "If you move gradually to a [higher] interest rate, money markets would work more like markets ... These low rates cause a search for yield and risk-taking which is an imbalance and that could cause some problems down the road."

  • #2
    Re: BIS:-Get your smegging rates up!

    84th BIS Annual Report, 2013/2014
    29 June 2014

    http://www.bis.org/publ/arpdf/ar2014e.htm


    Is there any other group that releases their big annual report over the weekend, knowing full well it will be big topic in the financial media over the course of the next week, beginning on Sunday? The BIS are good at this. There were a slew of articles about 'things the BIS said' written today.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: BIS:-Get your smegging rates up!

      I wish they would raise rates. Savers and retirees should be able to get a decent return without high risk.

      Be kinder than necessary because everyone you meet is fighting some kind of battle.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: BIS:-Get your smegging rates up!

        Originally posted by shiny! View Post
        I wish they would raise rates. Savers and retirees should be able to get a decent return without high risk.
        Why should savers and retirees be entitled to a return on any savings vehicle?
        I think that very premise is suspect.


        Personally, the inflation has cut my "savings" in half. However, wise people throughout history have warned against demanding interest from others. By keeping cash in interest bearing accounts, am I culpable? If I am going to yell FIRE, can I really still hold my own free-lunch expectations?

        Related: The government for the people by the people, etc... gave savers" and "retirees" the opportunity to not only protect, but actually increase their savings by purchasing safe-as-gold-government-bonds for the past 30 years. We have all been paying taxes directly or through inflation for that opportunity.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: BIS:-Get your smegging rates up!

          Originally posted by aaron View Post
          Why should savers and retirees be entitled to a return on any savings vehicle?
          I think that very premise is suspect.


          Personally, the inflation has cut my "savings" in half. However, wise people throughout history have warned against demanding interest from others. By keeping cash in interest bearing accounts, am I culpable? If I am going to yell FIRE, can I really still hold my own free-lunch expectations?

          Related: The government for the people by the people, etc... gave savers" and "retirees" the opportunity to not only protect, but actually increase their savings by purchasing safe-as-gold-government-bonds for the past 30 years. We have all been paying taxes directly or through inflation for that opportunity.
          The real return on savings accounts even in the days before ZIRP was negative. Creating an environment where idle money sitting in a savings account earning a nominal 1% tops is theft, plain and simple, as inflation is purportedly 2.5% but much more likely to be in excess of 5% for the things that are necessities of life: energy, food, and housing. In this mess, I'd be content just to get a rate of return on my cash that matches the rate of inflation: 2.5% per year.

          It would be one thing if rates were low because a large number of people do not want to take risk. It's another thing when rates are as low as they are because an entity is able to indiscriminately buy assets, not caring about the price it pays and using money it does not have to earn, to drive down the rates of return to force people into making a choice of a guaranteed loss of purchasing power, albeit slowly, in government-guaranteed financial products or a potential gain with a relatively high potential rapid loss of purchasing power by playing in a casino that no longer even attempts to hide the fact that not all players are honest and the house, if necessary, will cheat.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: BIS:-Get your smegging rates up!

            Originally posted by aaron View Post
            Originally Posted by shiny! I wish they would raise rates. Savers and retirees should be able to get a decent return without high risk.
            Why should savers and retirees be entitled to a return on any savings vehicle?
            I think that very premise is suspect.


            Personally, the inflation has cut my "savings" in half. However, wise people throughout history have warned against demanding interest from others. By keeping cash in interest bearing accounts, am I culpable? If I am going to yell FIRE, can I really still hold my own free-lunch expectations?

            Related: The government for the people by the people, etc... gave savers" and "retirees" the opportunity to not only protect, but actually increase their savings by purchasing safe-as-gold-government-bonds for the past 30 years. We have all been paying taxes directly or through inflation for that opportunity.
            mr aaron - the expectation of EARNING a return on ones SAVINGS - which is NET-NET income, that has been thru the ringer, tax-wise - at least several times, by the time it actually makes it into the 'savings' column -
            IS NOT A 'FREE LUNCH'

            THE VERY IDEA of that statement makes my blood boil (nuthin personal tho, mr a)

            the banks USED-TO be in the business of accepting deposits that they were allowed by their very own .GOV-granted EXHORBITANT PRIVILEGE - to leverage/lend-out to the CITIZENRY - so that WE, THE PEOPLE might 'bet on' OUR FUTURE prosperity - to do things like BUILD BUSINESSES, buy houses, cars etc that were beyond the immediate means of most peoples net monthly INCOMES -

            but *IF* we worked hard and SAVED - aka: had money left over at the end of the month (vs todays more typical, month-left-over-at-the-end-of-the-money) - that we might PLAN FOR OUR FUTURE - and HAVE A RIGHT and not a 'privilege' - to EXPECT A RETURN-ON (and not just a return-of) OUR CAPITAL

            esp when the banks take our capital, leverage it 10x (or more, never mind 70x), lend it out at 4 to TWENTY-FOUR % and then are given FREE MONEY by the 'federal' reserve to keep otherwise DEAD/non-performing loans on their books as 'ASSets' - while they get away with paying - effectively - BELOW ZEE-ROW rents on OUR CAPITAL

            this is absolutely, as Mr K sez: .gov-sanctioned THEFT OF OUR CAPITAL

            Originally posted by Milton Kuo View Post
            The real return on savings accounts even in the days before ZIRP was negative. Creating an environment where idle money sitting in a savings account earning a nominal 1% tops is theft, plain and simple, as inflation is purportedly 2.5% but much more likely to be in excess of 5% for the things that are necessities of life: energy, food, and housing. In this mess, I'd be content just to get a rate of return on my cash that matches the rate of inflation: 2.5% per year.

            It would be one thing if rates were low because a large number of people do not want to take risk. It's another thing when rates are as low as they are because an entity is able to indiscriminately buy assets, not caring about the price it pays and using money it does not have to earn, to drive down the rates of return to force people into making a choice of a guaranteed loss of purchasing power, albeit slowly, in government-guaranteed financial products or a potential gain with a relatively high potential rapid loss of purchasing power by playing in a casino that no longer even attempts to hide the fact that not all players are honest and the house, if necessary, will cheat.
            +1
            and THE BIGGEST CHEATERS OF THEM ALL are the 535+1 bullshit artists in the beltway.
            who have been 'funded by' their benefactors, and ENABLED by the LAMESTREAM MEDIA
            and have purposely CREATED this 'environment' by not only their flat-out REFUSING to create an HONEST BUDGET, while they 'horsetrade' with each other AS IF they somehow 'own' their offices - as in: you vote for MY states boondoggle and i'll vote for YOUR state's scam (on We, The People, aka The Taxpayers)

            even IF its because... uhhh... well... ummm... one party in particular is so fond of GIVING AWAY THE TREASURY to buy another sliver of the electorate, by PANDERING to ever smaller %'s of the public, in an effort to garner their 1-2% 'margins of victory'
            Last edited by lektrode; July 02, 2014, 12:53 PM. Reason: linked USED-TO be to The Culprits

            Comment

            Working...
            X