Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

G20 Showdown?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • G20 Showdown?

    26 MARCH 2014

    Currency Wars: The Plot Thickens
    "International discord over Ukraine does not bode well for the settlement of differences over the IMF’s future. Though the G7 is excluding Russia from its number, in retaliation for its action in Crimea, this does not amount to isolating Russia. There has been no suggestion that Russia be excluded from the G20.

    The USA and its allies have suspected that several other G20 members would not stand for it. This suspicion was confirmed yesterday when the BRICS foreign ministers, assembled at the international conference in The Hague, issued a statement condemning ‘the escalation of hostile language, sanctions and counter-sanctions’. They affirmed that the custodianship of the G20 belongs to all member-states equally and no one member-state can unilaterally determine its nature and character. In short, their statement read like a manifesto for a pluralist world in which no one nation, bloc or set of values would predominate...

    It now seems unlikely that the USA will complete (or, indeed, begin) legislative action on the IMF reform by the 10 April deadline the BRICS have set. The odds are moving in favour of a showdown at the G20 finance ministers’ and central bank governors’ meeting due in Washington on that date...

    Beijing leaders have long dreamt of displacing, or at least dethroning, the US dollar from its reserve currency role. US dominance of the IMF is one of several effective bars to the achievement of such a goal. The kind of action Russia is advocating, the BRICS wresting control of the IMF in despite of US veto power, might have some appeal.

    That would mark the end of the unified global monetary system that has developed since the IMF was founded in 1945, to be replaced by a bloc of fiat currencies in the developed countries and a system in the emerging sector where currencies were linked to drawing rights in some new international fund, possibly with some material backing. (gold, silver, and possibly commodities - Jesse)

    It seems unlikely that convertibility between these monetary systems could be maintained for long. Consequently, the 10 April meeting is shaping up as a potentially critical juncture in world economic history."

    Paul Mylchreest, A Critical Juncture

    Paul Mylchreest published this essay over at ZeroHedge this evening, and it is worth a read, as Paul is connecting some fairly important dots for us. I doubt that many traders will really understand the implications of what he is saying, without even having read the comments. Good traders often take a highly focused, very detailed, but narrow and short term view of things, and this is both their strength and their weakness. It deserves a broader stage, but it is unlikely to get it when the major media remains willfully blind.

    I had not thought of a dual system previously, in which the Anglo-Americans and their allied states decide to go in one direction, maintaining their hegemony around the dollar and the euro, and the rest of the world going in another. It would be inherently unstable, and throw the global credit and forex markets into a somewhat chaotic state. But then again, who could have predicted the folly of a loosely associated set of nations adopting a single currency without the rigor of monetary transfers and fiscal union with which to balance the system.

    This is not likely to be a singular event, but part of an evolutionary change in the makeup of the international monetary system that has been developing for years. At some point things will begin moving more quickly, and change may come in an avalanche of events that will leave most analysts gaping in disbelief.

    When do you think the American Revolution began, on 4 July 1776? Such great turns in human events happen over long periods of time. But, in retrospect, there are always critical junctures in the process of change, with hard positions taken, and opportunities for peaceful evolution lost.


    "All successful revolutions are the kicking in of a rotten door."

    John Kenneth Galbraith


    And since the grand failure of the Soviet state, nothing has grown more corrupt and self-serving than the ring of corporations and crony capitalists that have become the post Bretton Woods banking cartel. It has begun to consume itself, and to kill its own. The economic hitmen have finally come home.

    But predicting 'when' is difficult in matters such as this. What starts the avalanche, what sound triggers the slide, which snowflake proves to be too much? When is enough wealth and power— enough?

    Certainly the events in the Ukraine are difficult to understand without a broader geo-political and economic context, except in the most facile and jingoist of caricatures of different perspectives. They are barbarians, and hate us for our freedom, the wonders of our financial engineering, and the beauty of our culture. We are the liberators. We bring loans and economic progress. We come in peace. Look on our works, ye mighty, and despair.


    "Although U.S. Navy and Marine forces generally operate on a regular cycle of deployments to European waters, they rely on a network of permanent bases in the region, especially in the Mediterranean. These should be retained, and consideration given to establishing a more robust presence in the Black Sea. As NATO expands and the pattern of U.S. military operations in Europe continues to shift to the south and east, U.S. naval presence in the Black Sea is sure to increase." Project For the New American Century, 2000


    We are not the makers of history. We are not gods. We are not even the sovereigns of our own passions and delusions and fears.

    We who forget history are its victims.

    http://jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com/2014/03/currency-wars-plot-thickens.html




  • #2
    Re: G20 Showdown?

    The BRICS, all of them including the Big "C", have bigger problems than to get into a bun fight with a developed nation bloc. For a variety of reasons the fundamental model that drove each of their economies for the past decade or more is falling apart. Bernanke won.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: G20 Showdown?

      Will the barbarians wait again?

      Is that the question?

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: G20 Showdown?

        On the Western side we have a collapsing petrodollar, fiat world reserve currency which is dragging down all connected fiat currencies with it. On the Eastern side we have the BRICS and others who have tasted the forbidden fiat fruit of the West and discovered it is rotten to the core. Both sides are suffering from tremors and delirium. The West has long embraced warish preparations in place of a genuine domestic manufacturing economy, while the East has gleefully profited from the West's self inflicted de-industrialization. In the past decade we have seen a rising incidence of non-kinectic war being waged between these two sparring partners. Are the gloves about to come off? Will the blood begin to flow soon? Who cares? Its March Madness!
        "I love a dog, he does nothing for political reasons." --Will Rogers

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: G20 Showdown?

          Originally posted by photon555 View Post
          On the Western side we have a collapsing petrodollar, fiat world reserve currency which is dragging down all connected fiat currencies with it...
          A "collapsing petrodollar"? Are you sure? US$ index might be a bit volatile over time but the $DXY looks today about the same place it was in the early 1990s against other currencies...hardly a "collapse"...and probably about right for an economy still trying to grow after the financial crisis.


          Originally posted by photon555 View Post
          On the Eastern side we have the BRICS and others who have tasted the forbidden fiat fruit of the West and discovered it is rotten to the core. Both sides are suffering from tremors and delirium...
          The BRICS LOVE fiat fruit...next best thing to stealing IP, cigarettes and jailing dissidents.

          EJ calls this China's "Great Wall of Money".


          The others are similar:








          Originally posted by photon555 View Post
          The West has long embraced warish preparations in place of a genuine domestic manufacturing economy, while the East has gleefully profited from the West's self inflicted de-industrialization. In the past decade we have seen a rising incidence of non-kinectic war being waged between these two sparring partners. Are the gloves about to come off? Will the blood begin to flow soon? Who cares? Its March Madness!
          The self-inflicted de-industrialization is in large part a FIRE economy artifact. Despite the near-universal and increasingly desperate efforts to revive FIRE over the past 6 years it appears to be succumbing slowly but surely to its own cancerous cells...
          Last edited by GRG55; March 28, 2014, 09:42 PM.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: G20 Showdown?

            more russky propaganda?

            4 April 2014, 14:34


            Russia prepares to attack the petrodollar

            The existence of “petrodollars” is one of the pillars of America's economic might because it creates a significant external demand for American currency, allowing the US to accumulate enormous debts without defaulting. If a Japanese buyer want to buy a barrel of Saudi oil, he has to pay in dollars even if no American oil company ever touches the said barrel. Dollar has held a dominant position in global trading for such a long time that even Gazprom's natural gas contracts for Europe are priced and paid for in US dollars. Until recently, a significant part of EU-China trade had been priced in dollars.

            Lately, China has led the BRICS efforts to dislodge the dollar from its position as the main global currency, but the “sanctions war” between Washington and Moscow gave an impetus to the long-awaited scheme to launch the petroruble and switch all Russian energy exports away from the US currency .

            The main supporters of this plan are Sergey Glaziev, the economic aide of the Russian President and Igor Sechin, the CEO of Rosneft, the biggest Russian oil company and a close ally of Vladimir Putin. Both have been very vocal in their quest to replace the dollar with the Russian ruble. Now, several top Russian officials are pushing the plan forward.

            First, it was the Minister of Economy, Alexei Ulyukaev who told Russia 24 news channel that the Russian energy companies must should ditch the dollar. They must be braver in signing contracts in rubles and the currencies of partner-countries, he said.

            Then, on March 2, Andrei Kostin, the CEO of state-owned VTB bank, told the press that Gazprom, Rosneft and Rosoboronexport, state company specialized in weapon exports, can start trading in rubles. “ I've spoken to Gazprom, to Rosneft and Rosoboronexport management and they don't mind switching their exports to rubles. They only need a mechanism to do that ”, Kostin told the attendees of the annual Russian Bank Association meeting.

            Judging by the statement made at the same meeting by Valentina Matviyenko, the speaker of Russia's upper house of parliament, it is safe to assume that no resources will be spared to create such a mechanism. “ Some ‘hot headed' decision-makers have already forgotten that the global economic crisis of 2008 - which is still taking its toll on the world - started with a collapse of certain credit institutions in the US, Great Britain and other countries. This is why we believe that any hostile financial actions are a double-edged sword and even the slightest error will send the boomerang back to the aborigines,” she said.

            It seems that Moscow has decided who will be in charge of the “boomerang”. Igor Sechin, the CEO of Rosneft, has been nominated to chair the board of directors of Saint-Petersburg Commodity Exchange, a specialized commodity exchange. In October 2013, speaking at the World Energy Congress in Korea, Sechin called for a "global mechanism to trade natural gas" and went on suggesting that " it was advisable to create an international exchange for the participating countries, where transactions could be registered with the use of regional currencies ". Now, one of the most influential leaders of the global energy trading community has the perfect instrument to make this plan a reality. A Russian commodity exchange where reference prices for Russian oil and natural gas will be set in rubles instead of dollars will be a strong blow to the petrodollar.

            Rosneft has recently signed a series of big contracts for oil exports to China and is close to signing a “jumbo deal” with Indian companies. In both deals, there are no US dollars involved. Reuters reports, that Russia is close to entering a goods-for-oil swap transaction with Iran that will give Rosneft around 500,000 barrels of Iranian oil per day to sell in the global market. The White House and the russophobes in the Senate are livid and are trying to block the transaction because it opens up some very serious and nasty scenarios for the petrodollar. If Sechin decides to sell this Iranian oil for rubles, through a Russian exchange, such move will boost the chances of the “petroruble” and will hurt the petrodollar.

            It can be said that the US sanctions have opened a Pandora's box of troubles for the American currency. The Russian retaliation will surely be unpleasant for Washington, but what happens if other oil producers and consumers decide to follow the example set by Russia? During the last month, China opened two centers to process yuan-denominated trade flows, one in London and one in Frankfurt. Are the Chinese preparing a similar move against the greenback? We'll soon find out.

            http://voiceofrussia.com/2014_04_04/...rodollar-2335/



            Iran, Russia working to seal $20 bln oil-for-goods deal - sources


            (Reuters) - Iran and Russia have made progress towards an oil-for-goods deal sources said would be worth up to $20 billion, which would enable Tehran to boost vital energy exports in defiance of Western sanctions, people familiar with the negotiations told Reuters.

            In January Reuters reported Moscow and Tehran were discussing a barter deal that would see Moscow buy up to 500,000 barrels a day of Iranian oil in exchange for Russian equipment and goods.

            The White House has said such a deal would raise "serious concerns" and would be inconsistent with the nuclear talks between world powers and Iran.

            A Russian source said Moscow had "prepared all documents from its side", adding that completion of a deal was awaiting agreement on what oil price to lock in.

            The source said the two sides were looking at a barter arrangement that would see Iranian oil being exchanged for industrial goods including metals and food, but said there was no military equipment involved. The source added that the deal was expected to reach $15 to $20 billion in total and would be done in stages with an initial $6 billion to $8 billion tranche.

            The Iranian and Russian governments declined to comment.


            Comment

            Working...
            X