Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mega sez sorry to EJ....again..

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mega sez sorry to EJ....again..

    Becoming a bit of a habbit.

    2 years ago, i asked EJ if he like Jim Rickards thought Britan was about to "crash & burn". To my surpise (& diss-a-point-ment) he repiled "No". Then he went on to explain that i had failed to understand the impact that money from overseas was flowing into "the City" (London).

    He pointed to 2 sources, middle-eastern cash & more importantly....cash from Russia. He said i should look at Russian source clos-ely............
    ......"Bollocks!"..............I thought, on the scale of things its bugger all!

    Er, no he was right:-

    London’s Laundry Business

    By BEN JUDAH
    Inside


    Continue reading the main story
    Continue reading the main story





    Continue reading the main story Share This Page
    Continue reading the main story

    LONDON — THE city has changed. The buses are still dirty, the people are still passive-aggressive, but something about London has changed. You can see signs of it everywhere. The townhouses in the capital’s poshest districts are empty; they have been sold to Russian oligarchs and Qatari princes.

    England’s establishment is not what it was; the old imperial elite has become crude and mercenary. On Monday, a British civil servant was photographed arriving in Downing Street for a national security council meeting with an open document in his hand.

    We could read for ourselves lines from a confidential report on how Prime Minister David Cameron’s government should respond to the Crimea crisis. It recommended that Britain should “not support, for now, trade sanctions,” nor should it “close London’s financial center to Russians.”
    The White House has imposed visa restrictions on some Russian officials, and President Obama has issued an executive order enabling further sanctions. But Britain has already undermined any unified action by putting profit first.

    It boils down to this: Britain is ready to betray the United States to protect the City of London’s hold on dirty Russian money. And forget about Ukraine.

    Britain, open for business, no longer has a “mission.” Any moralizing remnant of the British Empire is gone; it has turned back to the pirate England of Sir Walter Raleigh. Britain’s ruling class has decayed to the point where its first priority is protecting its cut of Russian money — even as Russian armored personnel carriers rumble around the streets of Sevastopol. But the establishment understands that, in the 21st century, what matters are banks, not tanks.

    The Russians also understand this. They know that London is a center of Russian corruption, that their loot plunges into Britain’s empire of tax havens — from Gibraltar to Jersey, from the Cayman Islands to the British Virgin Islands — on which the sun never sets.

    British residency is up for sale. “Investor visas” can be purchased, starting at £1 million ($1.6 million). London lawyers in the Commercial Court now get 60 percent of their work from Russian and Eastern European clients. More than 50 Russia-based companies swell the trade at London’s Stock Exchange. The planning regulations have been scrapped, and along the Thames, up go spires of steel and glass for the hedge-funding class.

    Britain’s bright young things now become consultants, art dealers, private banker and hedge funders. Or, to put it another way, the oligarchs’ valets.

    Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin, gets it: you pay them, you own them. Mr. Putin was absolutely certain that Britain’s managers — shuttling through the revolving door between cabinet posts and financial boards — would never give up their fees and commissions from the oligarchs’ billions. He was right.

    In the austerity years of zero growth that followed the 2008 financial crash, this new source of vast wealth could not be resisted. Tony Blair is the latter-day embodiment of pirate Britain’s Sir Walter Raleigh.

    The former prime minister now advises the Kazakh ruler Nursultan Nazarbayev on his image in the West. Mr. Blair is handsomely paid to tutor his patron on how to be evasive about the crackdowns and the mine shootings that are facts of life in Kazakhstan.

    This is Britain’s growth business today: laundering oligarchs’ dirty billions, laundering their dirty reputations.

    It could be otherwise. Banking sanctions could turn off the financial pipelines through which corrupt officials channel Russian money. Visa restrictions could cut Kremlin ministers off from their mansions. The tax havens that rob the national budget of billions could be forced to be accountable. Britain has the power to bankrupt the Putin clique.

    But London has changed. And the Shard — the Qatari-owned, 72-floor skyscraper above the grotty Southwark riverside — is a symbol of that change.

    The Shard encapsulates the new hierarchy of the city. On the top floors, “ultra high net worth individuals” entertain escorts in luxury apartments. By day, on floors below, investment bankers trade incomprehensible derivatives.

    Come nightfall, the elevators are full of African cleaners, paid next to nothing and treated as nonexistent. The acres of glass windows are scrubbed by Polish laborers, who sleep four to a room in bedsit slums. And near the Shard are the immigrants from Lithuania and Romania, who broke their backs on construction sites, but are now destitute and whiling away their hours along the banks of the Thames.

    The Shard is London, a symbol of a city where oligarchs are celebrated and migrants are exploited but that pretends to be a multicultural utopia. Here, in their capital city, the English are no longer calling the shots. They are hirelings.

  • #2
    Re: Mega sez sorry to EJ....again..

    There does not seem to be much difference between owners and owned...both appear to be getting what they want. Somehow, though, it appears that British-ness has disappeared from some parts of London, and no doubt other cities as well, and that is what is aggravating.

    No one apparently minded having Owners when they were British in style, and language. It's all that brash, gaudy, heavy handed Russian-ness that is the problem. And they do not politely smile.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Mega sez sorry to EJ....again..

      Originally posted by Forrest View Post
      And they do not politely smile.
      Just a culture thing.

      The first time I visited Russia after 8 years in Canada, I thought that Russians in Russia must be very depressed. The reason I thought this is because they do not smile at strangers – on the streets, in the metro, in the store or anywhere else. However, this does not mean they are unhappy.

      The reason Russians don’t smile at each other on the streets is because smiling is generally considered to be something to be shared with a friend. Smiling at a stranger is considered to be an “Americanism” and is assumed to be insincere. Even Russian waiters and store clerks will usually not smile at you. Don’t be afraid – and don’t walk around grinning at everybody, either.http://gorussia.about.com/od/practic...-In-Russia.htm
      "Don't smile. Be direct. Put on a decent suit and do something about that awful haircut, man!" That's how you behave in Russia. Like in an old Quaker Monthly Meeting, only better looking.

      Comment

      Working...
      X