Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

RE: Serf's Up

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • RE: Serf's Up

    I think it is safe to say that investor activity in the housing market has changed the face of real estate buying. Back when the crisis hit in 2007, some analysts were cheerleading the hedge fund crowd as a tiny blip in the market. It is hard to call it a blip when 30 to 40 percent of all purchases are going to investors for close to half a decade. A recent analysis from RealtyTrac found that the estimated monthly home payment for a regular three bedroom home (costs include mortgage, insurance, taxes, maintenance, and subtracting the income tax benefit) rose an average of 21 percent from a year ago in 325 US counties. What about household incomes? That is another story. So it is no surprise that we are largely becoming a nation of renters. It is also no shocker that young households are largely unable to begin household formation via buying a home. Many are living with parents well into “young” adulthood. For the first time in history, we had a six year stretch where we added more renter households than that of actual homeowners.


    Renter nation


    Many large hedge funds and investors have already securitized large pools of single family homes and have created a monthly payout structure based on monthly rents. Returns so far are not looking fantastic since being a landlord is a slow churn business. The Wall Street crowd is accustomed to big wins via Google, Tesla, or Twitter and not a drip-drip leak that is provided from monthly rental payments. Keep in mind that with rentals, you have expenses via repairs, vacancies, and you are essentially capped on how much you can jack up rents by how much households actually earn since people pay rents out of monthly incomes, not heavily subsidized mortgage payments.


    You would think that with rates still being low we would have been adding large numbers of households to the ownership column. The opposite has occurred:



    Source: Wells Fargo


    This is not your baby boomer housing market which many are accustomed to. In fact, you’ll notice that the period between 2006 to the present is very much an anomaly. We’ve been adding a boatload of renter households for six full years while the over 5,000,000+ foreclosed owners have shifted ownership back into the hands of the banking system. This is the first time a trend like this has occurred going back to data from 1966.


    What is important to remember based on economic metrics is that the recession officially ended in the summer of 2009. We’ve been nearly half a decade in recovery and all we can muster is net adds of renter households? Is owning a home no longer part of the American dream? Not when you can’t afford to buy because you are being outbid by hedge funds leveraging cheap digital debt or your income is simply unable to swing the payment.


    Purchase applications


    The first chart should highlight the dramatic shift of adding renter households since 2006. It is also interesting to note that this trend started in 2006, not 2008 when the market went into full meltdown mode. Why? Because households were already broke going back prior to the official meltdown. The nucleus of the meltdown was households and banks using money they didn’t have to leverage into speculation. Households are paying the price while banks have mastered the churn business and are leveraging low rates for their own gain. You begin to scratch your head regarding the massive run-up in prices last year when you look at purchase applications:



    Where is this demand to cause prices to go up? The demand is coming from controlled supply, banking demand for homes, and massive speculation. It certainly isn’t coming from households buying in mass. The chart above shows that purchase applications are essentially back to where they were 20 years ago. The difference? We’ve added 54,000,000 people since then.
    Homeownership


    The homeownership rate peaked in 2006. This logically coincides with the jump in renter households starting around this period:



    The current homeownership rate is the same as it was 20 years ago. We’ve done a good job cutting out young households from buying. Unfortunately there seems to be a myopic disregard of younger generations in the current economy. Rarely will someone admit it but the younger households of today are unlikely to have it as good as did the baby boomers. The data backs this up. A common rebuttal to this revolves around all the goodies added by technological advancement. Sure, we all benefit from this, young and old. But you can’t live in an iPad or pay the grocery bill with your Facebook posts. Aside from a handful that can leverage technological gains, many others are left in the financial dust.


    The middle class is simply shrinking in the US. This is a challenging reality. The “American Dream” of everyone owning a home may have been a baby boomer mantra but doesn’t seem to be the case since the early 2000s. Even the bubble of the 2000s was a delusional boom built on easy debt papering over lost wages and a shrinking standard of living. In addition, not everyone should own but why subsidize big banks in purchasing single family homes by crushing real interest rates? There is absolutely nothing wrong with renting. In fact, this may make more sense for millions of households. Yet there is a massive propaganda machine for homeownership around the country that slowly nudges people into buying based on age and emotions rather than subtle personal economic circumstances.


    New home sales still extremely weak


    Another major divergence we are seeing is with new home sales. New home sales were always a big part of the “newly formed” household movement. Yet you need a steady tide of households to actually afford new homes that carry a premium in price. There has been a massive disconnect here going back to 2006 again:



    New home sales remain incredibly weak. Investors are looking for lower priced deals for better cap rates. You don’t make solid money by purchasing a $250,000 new home and renting it out for $1,500.


    First time buyers shutout


    Finally, the bread and butter of any healthy housing market is the first-time buyer. First-time buyers make up a remarkably small portion of the existing home sale market:

    First-time buyers are typically young Americans. With $1.2 trillion in student debt and lower paying jobs, do you think the rise in home prices is a plus for this group? Ironically, government backed student debt is hovering around 6.8 percent while mortgages are cheaper at around 4.5 percent! Since the government owns both of these manipulated debt markets, they are essentially favoring housing over educating future generations which ultimately is a bigger asset to our nation. Instead, we rather finance a crappy World War II shack in Southern California with manipulated debt for up to $700,000 and allow others to lock in golden real estate handcuffs. These charts, if you looked at them without knowing the inside game of the Fed and banks, would lead you to believe that home values were falling or at best, stagnant. You wouldn’t expect to see one of the best annual increases in prices on record.


    A few years ago when I mentioned that our economy was becoming more feudal in nature some readers felt this was farfetched. Those comments have slowly disappeared. Why? Because many people over these years have faced the repercussions of the massive number of big bank investor buyers either through being outbid, seeing prices re-inflate, or through a lack of inventory controlled by banks. What is certain is that we now have mega-landlords in this country and this trend continues as the overall homeownership rate dips. The fact that foreclosures recently surged tells you that something else is going on here. Given the above figures it is understandable why we’ve slowly shifted to a renter nation.

  • #2
    Re: Serf's Up

    hmm, another commentator getting all in a twist over the current RE bubble (original link don?)

    I just see all of this as a dead cat bounce in the RE market. The Fed funneled cheap money to institutional investors. The Institutional's, being totally detached from the reality of a landlord, have pumped the money into another unsustainable housing bubble. The banks seeing an break on their negative equity Repos are flooding the market. (I wonder how many people have managed to live without paying their mortgage since 08?)

    All of this is total folly and the housing market will resume it's downward trend until homes are affordable to the average person. The only question remains is how painful will the recession get for the average Joe and what rabbits will Govs and CBs pull out of their hats to try and "save" things?

    It'll be a rocky ride, but I think the big boys have really over extended themselves this time.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Serf's Up

      Originally posted by Fox View Post
      hmm, another commentator getting all in a twist over the current RE bubble (original link don?)
      The article is from Doctor Housing Bubble. He's been writing about the housing bubble since the early days and being in Southern California, I believe, he's seen a full reflation of the housing bubble in the decent locations.

      Originally posted by Fox View Post
      It'll be a rocky ride, but I think the big boys have really over extended themselves this time.
      That's what we all thought last time (and it was true.) What remains to be seen is if they'll be forced to take their medicine this time. This bubble has gone on far longer than I ever imagined.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Serf's Up

        RBS, son of MBS, will never be as potent for several reasons, one being that rabbits been pulled out of the hat too many times. Another is the reality check from a renters' pool is so much shorter than from a ninja mortgage loan pool, which as we know, can stretch out for years (and years and years . . .)

        Hey, I wonder if renters who fail to pay get a free ride, as their mortgage non-paying brethren do, if they have a RBS membership card. They may be more valuable appearing occupied, until the RBS can be dumped on a pension or two.

        Government subsidy note: Across from our development supposedly Luxury Rentals are going to be built, with government assistance supplementing firefighters and police rent payments. This resulted from a confluence of what?

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Serf's Up

          Saw something the other day about BlackRock trying to get out of their vast collection of foreclosed single family homes now being rented.
          Seems that they are having trouble keeping occupancy rates high and rent payments current for thousands and thousands of houses scattered across the US.

          I expected these guys to have trouble being real-world landlords.
          Property management is hard, hands-on work, and the landlord needs to get it right or the homes bleed cash money.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Serf's Up

            Originally posted by don View Post
            RBS, son of MBS, will never be as potent for several reasons, one being that rabbits been pulled out of the hat too many times. Another is the reality check from a renters' pool is so much shorter than from a ninja mortgage loan pool, which as we know, can stretch out for years (and years and years . . .)
            Yes I agree. I don't think we won't have to wait long to see this one fall apart. EJ did say that housing markets take a long time to correct, so this looks like a typical stock crash just being played out in slow motion. Is Crammer "yelling buy the dip" yet? XD

            In the end though I'd like to think there will be an affordable housing light at the end of the tunnel.
            However...

            Originally posted by Milton Kuo View Post
            What remains to be seen is if they'll be forced to take their medicine this time. This bubble has gone on far longer than I ever imagined.
            This is the $10 Trillion dollar question. How big of a mess will TPTB make of things trying to help?

            Do they have any bullets left? Can the FED start up QE again without people realizing they are useless? What new concoction will they come up with next?

            Three out of four of the big housing numbers were bad this month. Inventory, Sales, Foreclosures; all of them vastly off of expectations. The only one that was up was prices. hmm, growing inventory, falling affordability, rising prices. Classic bubble.

            but at least what give me some Freudenschade on this is that it's the big boys that will be hit hardest. The general public is only a small part of the housing market now.

            Originally posted by thriftyandboringinohio View Post
            I expected these guys to have trouble being real-world landlords.
            Property management is hard, hands-on work, and the landlord needs to get it right or the homes bleed cash money.
            I couldn't agree more Thrifty' . Do you have a link? I heard Blackrock was having trouble a few months ago. I'd love to see an update.
            (Just combining posts here)
            Last edited by Fox; February 21, 2014, 03:55 PM.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Serf's Up

              Originally posted by don View Post
              RBS, son of MBS, will never be as potent for several reasons, one being that rabbits been pulled out of the hat too many times. Another is the reality check from a renters' pool is so much shorter than from a ninja mortgage loan pool, which as we know, can stretch out for years (and years and years . . .)

              Hey, I wonder if renters who fail to pay get a free ride, as their mortgage non-paying brethren do, if they have a RBS membership card. They may be more valuable appearing occupied, until the RBS can be dumped on a pension or two.

              Government subsidy note: Across from our development supposedly Luxury Rentals are going to be built, with government assistance supplementing firefighters and police rent payments. This resulted from a confluence of what?
              Look at this from another viewpoint; your "friend" in banking has told you that he can offer you, say, a $2.5 billion loan at, say, 3%. He also gives you the full lowdown on some equally friendly supplier of High Speed Trading software guaranteed to bring in, say, a 15% return. So you set up your hedge fund and high speed trading operation and sit down to wait. So what?

              You are sitting there with roughly $300 million income for no outlay whatever and you then decide to follow the trend and buy into housing to rent out. Well now, by this time you have a very nice stash thank you. What happens when the sh one t hits the fan?

              Who, in that situation is going to give a Damn?

              The speculators have nothing to lose.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Serf's Up

                Originally posted by thriftyandboringinohio View Post
                Saw something the other day about BlackRock trying to get out of their vast collection of foreclosed single family homes now being rented.
                Seems that they are having trouble keeping occupancy rates high and rent payments current for thousands and thousands of houses scattered across the US.

                I expected these guys to have trouble being real-world landlords.
                Property management is hard, hands-on work, and the landlord needs to get it right or the homes bleed cash money.
                FIRE thinking: swap some papers, buy some assets, get some cash flow. Work? What work?

                Comment

                Working...
                X