Re: Walmart holds Food Drive for its Own Employees
yo dc!
again sir, you've outdone yerself...
+1
and loaded is an understatement, big guy....
;)
esp since it never occurred to me that i was a 'leftie' (altho as i understand it, the terms 'rightwing' and 'leftwing' descended from the english house of commons(?) where the right side of the hall was filled with pols who rep'd the owners/aristocracy POV and the left side of the hall was filled with reps of the peasant/working classes' POV ??) - altho i will admit - being a self-employed type - that while my politix generally sides with the business-oriented POV, that i do strongly believe that business, particularly BIG BIZ's corporatocracy/kleptocracy - owes the working class more than WE, The People are getting - and its BIG GOV that is catering to the corporate interests, at the expense of us SMALL BIZ/working stiffs
and this all (above) seemed - to me, a typical J6P - to simplify 'definitions' - right up til the 'old philosophy' definitions of 'liberalism' and 'socialism' gets to be - to me - kinda far-out into.... uhhhh.... left field (pardon the pun, i'm still reeling from the 'sox pullin another one out the hat ;)
which also seems to me, to be where things get overly complicated, as it pertains to 'modern' US politix - and IMHO, is why the use of these labels, esp here in The New World, itself still a mere child of evolution _away_ from the constraints of 'traditions' of the old world (namely the aristocracy, particularly the monarchies of old europe, which are still in power there today - and we now have (some in) the political class attempting to re-create exactly that which that not even 200 years after the founders threw-off that whole twistedly corrupt system, risked EVERYTHING and paid the ultimate price to succeed - only to have events beginning exactly 100years ago that have put us directly on the track to accomplish precisely what they warned us about - namely Jefferson's warning about the banks, the 'national' bank, in particular)
at least thats how my limited educational background is able to parse it all - and, again - i SINCERELY APPRECIATE you taking the time to expand on all this stuff (never mind the effort in typing it all, since either you likely think/type _much_ faster than i can, or are at least as good as i am with CTRL-A, CTRL-C, CTRL-V ;)
+1 to that too.
methinks most of us DO actually agree more on a lot of this stuff than we seem to disagree on - at least when it comes to
'where we are' - it seems to me that its 'how we got here' is where the disagreement develops?
and having had the benefit of being a (former) new englander, growing up/ coming of age and a commuter tween 2 of the most glaringly different states' M.O.'s in The US (that would be MA & NH, with ME to the right and... umm... VT to the.... uhhhh... left ;) - i happen to think i have some pretty credible POV on this kinda stuff (never mind after having lived in FL, CA & HI)
and i have to agree with a lot of, maybe even most of what VT is getting at - while perhaps not as eloquent as either he or yourself is at explaining - what it gets down to for me is that one side of the aisle in particular (with no allegience to either, seeing as too many are RINO/DINO's and NONE seem to have any more conviction beyond what the latest lib-dominated media-driven opinion polls are bullhorning this week)
the REAL PROBLEM?
is defined - IMHO - by emergence of The Political Aristocracy, that has - mostly - developed since the days of the 'camelot' bunch in the 60's
and the elevation of political 'science' within the halls of academia to that which garners the .edu-industrial complex along with the social-welfare-industrial complex more power today than even the .mil-industrial complex has?
coupled with the near total take-over of the .gov by the legal-industrial complex - which gets their strings pulled from lower manhattan - witnessed/evidenced by the actions - or more precisely - the LACK of action by the dept of 'justice' with its absolute _failure_ to address some of the most aggregious economic harm that has ever been foisted upon WE, The People - while the party in power continues to shower BILLIONS IN FAVORS to the pet constituencies
(not withstanding the TRILLIONS already bestowed upon their biggest contributors)
its still my position that LIMITING THE .GOV'S ABILITY TO TAX AND SPEND IS OUR ONLY 'hope for change'
as the political class shows no intention whatsover of changing a GD thing - no matter _what_ side of the aisle they're sitting on (this year/election cycle) - and the benefit of this can STILL be seen, near 400years later, in the state with the now somewhat quaint moto of:
The Live Free or Die State
despite the 'best efforts' of some of the newcomers to 'fix things'
and thus i remain, a 'small-r' type (who appreciates you - and woody's - taking the time to educate us 'rightwingers' )
but - still waiting on an answer to one question -
seeing as the topic here is wally-world - on which i have a(nother long boring story i'd like to share with y'all)
and that was the question that Mr J asked, on the last sentence of his post above:
in this 'big game of jeopardy' we find ourselves in?
i'll take "famous quotes for $200, alex (EJ)..."
who was it that said - of a certain 'free trade' deal - that if it passes, the only thing we'll hear is
THAT GIANT SUCKING SOUND
as the productive capacity of what was once the mightiest productive economy/country/people that ever existed on earth gets offshored - in the name of 'comparative advantage' and 'profits' ?
AND NOW THE LIB-LEFT-DEMS WANT TO BLAME ALL THIS ON WALMART?
next joke - i say of the big-boxification of america - of which wally world is merely one of the best competitors?
this is AN EFFECT of the political economy
and we can blame _that_ on the proponents of BIG GOV as well.
yo dc!
again sir, you've outdone yerself...
Originally posted by dcarrigg
View Post
and loaded is an understatement, big guy....
;)
esp since it never occurred to me that i was a 'leftie' (altho as i understand it, the terms 'rightwing' and 'leftwing' descended from the english house of commons(?) where the right side of the hall was filled with pols who rep'd the owners/aristocracy POV and the left side of the hall was filled with reps of the peasant/working classes' POV ??) - altho i will admit - being a self-employed type - that while my politix generally sides with the business-oriented POV, that i do strongly believe that business, particularly BIG BIZ's corporatocracy/kleptocracy - owes the working class more than WE, The People are getting - and its BIG GOV that is catering to the corporate interests, at the expense of us SMALL BIZ/working stiffs
and this all (above) seemed - to me, a typical J6P - to simplify 'definitions' - right up til the 'old philosophy' definitions of 'liberalism' and 'socialism' gets to be - to me - kinda far-out into.... uhhhh.... left field (pardon the pun, i'm still reeling from the 'sox pullin another one out the hat ;)
which also seems to me, to be where things get overly complicated, as it pertains to 'modern' US politix - and IMHO, is why the use of these labels, esp here in The New World, itself still a mere child of evolution _away_ from the constraints of 'traditions' of the old world (namely the aristocracy, particularly the monarchies of old europe, which are still in power there today - and we now have (some in) the political class attempting to re-create exactly that which that not even 200 years after the founders threw-off that whole twistedly corrupt system, risked EVERYTHING and paid the ultimate price to succeed - only to have events beginning exactly 100years ago that have put us directly on the track to accomplish precisely what they warned us about - namely Jefferson's warning about the banks, the 'national' bank, in particular)
at least thats how my limited educational background is able to parse it all - and, again - i SINCERELY APPRECIATE you taking the time to expand on all this stuff (never mind the effort in typing it all, since either you likely think/type _much_ faster than i can, or are at least as good as i am with CTRL-A, CTRL-C, CTRL-V ;)
As Sartori said, we are prisoners of the words we pick, we had better pick them well.
And I think we're on much better ground trying to begin from a basis in old philosophy rather than trying to begin by defining things the way the think-tank propaganda machines do.
Otherwise, we cannot even have a meaningful conversation.
And I think we're on much better ground trying to begin from a basis in old philosophy rather than trying to begin by defining things the way the think-tank propaganda machines do.
Otherwise, we cannot even have a meaningful conversation.
+1 to that too.
methinks most of us DO actually agree more on a lot of this stuff than we seem to disagree on - at least when it comes to
'where we are' - it seems to me that its 'how we got here' is where the disagreement develops?
and having had the benefit of being a (former) new englander, growing up/ coming of age and a commuter tween 2 of the most glaringly different states' M.O.'s in The US (that would be MA & NH, with ME to the right and... umm... VT to the.... uhhhh... left ;) - i happen to think i have some pretty credible POV on this kinda stuff (never mind after having lived in FL, CA & HI)
and i have to agree with a lot of, maybe even most of what VT is getting at - while perhaps not as eloquent as either he or yourself is at explaining - what it gets down to for me is that one side of the aisle in particular (with no allegience to either, seeing as too many are RINO/DINO's and NONE seem to have any more conviction beyond what the latest lib-dominated media-driven opinion polls are bullhorning this week)
the REAL PROBLEM?
is defined - IMHO - by emergence of The Political Aristocracy, that has - mostly - developed since the days of the 'camelot' bunch in the 60's
and the elevation of political 'science' within the halls of academia to that which garners the .edu-industrial complex along with the social-welfare-industrial complex more power today than even the .mil-industrial complex has?
coupled with the near total take-over of the .gov by the legal-industrial complex - which gets their strings pulled from lower manhattan - witnessed/evidenced by the actions - or more precisely - the LACK of action by the dept of 'justice' with its absolute _failure_ to address some of the most aggregious economic harm that has ever been foisted upon WE, The People - while the party in power continues to shower BILLIONS IN FAVORS to the pet constituencies
(not withstanding the TRILLIONS already bestowed upon their biggest contributors)
its still my position that LIMITING THE .GOV'S ABILITY TO TAX AND SPEND IS OUR ONLY 'hope for change'
as the political class shows no intention whatsover of changing a GD thing - no matter _what_ side of the aisle they're sitting on (this year/election cycle) - and the benefit of this can STILL be seen, near 400years later, in the state with the now somewhat quaint moto of:
The Live Free or Die State
despite the 'best efforts' of some of the newcomers to 'fix things'
and thus i remain, a 'small-r' type (who appreciates you - and woody's - taking the time to educate us 'rightwingers' )
but - still waiting on an answer to one question -
seeing as the topic here is wally-world - on which i have a(nother long boring story i'd like to share with y'all)
and that was the question that Mr J asked, on the last sentence of his post above:
Originally posted by EJ
View Post
i'll take "famous quotes for $200, alex (EJ)..."
who was it that said - of a certain 'free trade' deal - that if it passes, the only thing we'll hear is
THAT GIANT SUCKING SOUND
as the productive capacity of what was once the mightiest productive economy/country/people that ever existed on earth gets offshored - in the name of 'comparative advantage' and 'profits' ?
AND NOW THE LIB-LEFT-DEMS WANT TO BLAME ALL THIS ON WALMART?
next joke - i say of the big-boxification of america - of which wally world is merely one of the best competitors?
this is AN EFFECT of the political economy
and we can blame _that_ on the proponents of BIG GOV as well.
Comment