Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Crowdfunding and some sunshine for: pricinghealthcare ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Crowdfunding and some sunshine for: pricinghealthcare ?

    this is an interesting development (esp in a place where small business leaders - 75 percent - don't like or are ambivalent about the aca)

    and some are willing to put their money/time/effort where their mouth is
    (very refreshing attitude, btw, and a real 'change we can believe in'...)

    Utahn vows website will 'bust open' health care prices

    His website’s aim is to lower prices by distributing hard-to-find information.

    By Kirsten stewart | The Salt Lake Tribune

    A Utah entrepreneur hopes to cash in on American outrage over the high price of health care with an online tool that will allow consumers to share billing data and shop for the best deals on procedures, from MRIs to joint replacements.

    Randy Cox, founder and CEO of the American Fork start-up pricinghealthcare.com, said the idea was born from personal frustration. "My wife had been taking immuno-therapy for years and had a sudden jump in one of her bills of 25 percent. I started making some phone calls to find out what the price was based on and how it compared to those at other facilities and got nowhere. It’s virtually impossible."

    It’s not as if Cox didn’t know the right people or questions to ask. The Brigham Young University computer science graduate has worked as a software developer in the medical field for companies such as US Medical IT, Allscripts Healthcare Solutions and Misys Healthcare.

    But hospital prices have long been a closely held secret. When insurance companies sign on with provider networks, they generally agree not to disclose their contracted prices.

    The veil is slowly being lifted as consumers demand more transparency, but only enough to show tantalizing bits of information — never the whole picture, said Cox. "Our product is something that doesn’t exist anywhere else, and it has the potential to bust the health-care pricing market wide open, saving a lot people hundreds of thousands on medical bills."

    Earlier this year, the Obama administration published data revealing what hospitals across the country charge for common procedures. The data showed huge variation in prices across the country, even within states and cities.
    Experts questioned the value of the information, arguing the charges are largely fictitious list prices or the starting point for public and private insurers to negotiate discounts. Only the uninsured and under-insured, such as those with high deductibles, are charged these rates.

    Pricing Healthcare, on the other hand, hopes to allow you to search for a procedure and see which hospitals in your area have the lowest cash rate, insurance rate and list price — at least, when it’s fully functional.

    The website’s strength — its crowd-sourcing method for collecting data — could also be its downfall.

    Before you’re allowed to shop the site, you have to contribute to it by entering data from one of your own medical bills or insurer-provided "explanation of benefits." And until a critical mass of people upload their information, the website isn’t of much use.

    You can test-drive a beta version launched earlier this month and register to enter data. But the only price comparisons you’re able to see now are from hospitals in San Francisco, which are required by law to disclose their prices.

    "It gives you a good feel for how it works," said an early user, Brent Bennett, an insurance broker in Provo who added that he heard about the site from a client. He uploaded his information hoping to "help the next guy" who visits the site.

    Privacy concerns can make people wary about sharing health information. But Cox said Pricing Healthcare encrypts all of its data and shares no personal information, only aggregate billing data. It will verify the accuracy of data by watching for bills that seem to be outliers, he said, not by checking out individual bills.

    He is enticing early adopters with the promise of free access. Consumers eventually will be charged an annual subscription fee of about $10 to $40.

    He’ll also sell subscriptions to insurers, insurance agents and hospitals. "Hospitals will pay a pretty penny to find out their competitors’ prices," he said.

    The company isn’t without competition.

    Healthcarebluebook.com publishes "fair" prices for virtually any procedure imaginable. "But they don’t tell you where they’re getting their data from," said Bennett.


    Most major insurance companies, including Utah’s SelectHealth, Regence BlueCross BlueShield and Arches Health Plan, have searchable databases where policyholders can calculate their out-of-pocket costs for procedure X at hospital Y.

    But the information is for policyholders’ eyes only and these insurers don’t post their proprietary contracted amounts or what they pay.

    "So if you have a high deductible plan or you’re out of town, outside your plan’s coverage area, or you need something like genetic testing that’s not covered by your insurance, you have no way of knowing what you’ll be charged," said Bennett.

    Times are changing, however. North Carolina recently passed a law requiring hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers to disclose what they’re paid for 140 medical procedures and services.

    And Utah’s Public Employee Health Plan (PEHP) covering state workers has started publishing its contracted prices, which could be a game-changer, said Rep. Jim Dunnigan, R-Taylorsville, an insurance broker. Unlike other private insurers, PEHP contracts with every major hospital in Utah.

    "Now they just have to get the consumer engaged. We’re hearing it’s been modestly used, so far," said Dunnigan. "If you are on the hook for a portion of the bill, it will get your attention. If not, maybe you won’t care."
    considering how ENRAGED most (of us individual plan buyers) are about this topic, that shouldnt be all that difficult...

  • #2
    Re: Crowdfunding and some sunshine for: pricinghealthcare ?

    It is a good idea - but unfortunately doomed to fail.

    For one thing - if the doctors and health care customers don't know what the pricing is, I fail to see how this can be communicated effectively to other people.

    For example: you have Health Care Insurance company policy A, but someone else has Health Care Insurance company policy B. The price you pay vs. someone else is different. The list prices in fact can be different - much less the co-pay and out-of-pocket.

    Add in multiple Health Insurance Companies, Medicare, ObamaCare, Medicaid, etc - and you get a morass of unusable information.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Crowdfunding and some sunshine for: pricinghealthcare ?

      you have Health Care Insurance company policy A, but someone else has Health Care Insurance company policy B. The price you pay vs. someone else is different. The list prices in fact can be different - much less the co-pay and out-of-pocket.

      Add in multiple Health Insurance Companies, Medicare, ObamaCare, Medicaid, etc - and you get . . .

      crowd billing . . .

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Crowdfunding and some sunshine for: pricinghealthcare ?

        Originally posted by don View Post
        you have Health Care Insurance company policy A, but someone else has Health Care Insurance company policy B. The price you pay vs. someone else is different. The list prices in fact can be different - much less the co-pay and out-of-pocket.

        Add in multiple Health Insurance Companies, Medicare, ObamaCare, Medicaid, etc - and you get . . .

        crowd billing . . .

        Doesn't Medicare/Medicaid disclose what they pay for procedures? If so, seems like that would be a good starting point for setting prices and having pricing transparency.

        Auto mechanics have a flat-rate book that says how long any repair should take on average. The mechanic sets their hourly rate, then bills according to their hourly rate X billable hours in the flat-rate book.

        Why can't medical billing be similar? Use the Medicare/Medicaid compensations as a base, then let providers and/or insurance companies tack on higher rates if they wish, like "rate + 15%", "rate + 20%", etc...

        Doctors and clinics could lower their fees significantly if they could contract with patients directly and not pay so much overhead to deal with the insurance company middle-men.

        Be kinder than necessary because everyone you meet is fighting some kind of battle.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Crowdfunding and some sunshine for: pricinghealthcare ?

          Originally posted by shiny
          Doesn't Medicare/Medicaid disclose what they pay for procedures? If so, seems like that would be a good starting point for setting prices and having pricing transparency.

          Auto mechanics have a flat-rate book that says how long any repair should take on average. The mechanic sets their hourly rate, then bills according to their hourly rate X billable hours in the flat-rate book.

          Why can't medical billing be similar? Use the Medicare/Medicaid compensations as a base, then let providers and/or insurance companies tack on higher rates if they wish, like "rate + 15%", "rate + 20%", etc...

          Doctors and clinics could lower their fees significantly if they could contract with patients directly and not pay so much overhead to deal with the insurance company middle-men.
          Medicare has a standard set of prices, but no one who isn't on Medicare can get those prices.

          And for everyone else - there is no standardization.

          There isn't even standardization for people paying cash.

          Your comment above assumes that insurance companies etc desire transparency, when they do not.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Crowdfunding and some sunshine for: pricinghealthcare ?

            Originally posted by c1ue View Post
            Medicare has a standard set of prices, but no one who isn't on Medicare can get those prices.

            And for everyone else - there is no standardization.

            There isn't even standardization for people paying cash.

            Your comment above assumes that insurance companies etc desire transparency, when they do not.
            I know they do not want price transparency. They will fight tooth and nail to prevent price transparency. I'm saying we should force price transparency. We should be able to compare every provider's prices, and every insurer's compensation against a base price, and I think since Medicare has a price list we should use it for the base price.

            Be kinder than necessary because everyone you meet is fighting some kind of battle.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Crowdfunding and some sunshine for: pricinghealthcare ?

              Originally posted by shiny
              We should be able to compare every provider's prices, and every insurer's compensation against a base price, and I think since Medicare has a price list we should use it for the base price.
              As I noted previously - one reason why it is impossible to compare prices is because there is no common ground to compare on.

              Sure, some web site could allow people to share what price they paid - but the vastly different insurance plans are such that this information is simply not going to usable by too many people.

              Equally even if a bunch of people had the same plan, the health service providers don't have pricing standardization.

              Then there's the expertise issue.

              If it is already difficult to tell one contractor offering from another for a relatively constrained area like home improvement/repair - how much harder is it for a layman to correctly describe all that was done medically on his/her behalf? To tell if one medication is equivalent, better, worse, or even completely unrelated to the other? To understand if this procedure or that procedure makes more sense to the condition in question?

              The only way that has been shown to work is to have a provider which is not interested in profit and doesn't have payment issues as an always-there alternative. Or in other words, national health care.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Crowdfunding and some sunshine for: pricinghealthcare ?

                Originally posted by c1ue View Post
                As I noted previously - one reason why it is impossible to compare prices is because there is no common ground to compare on.

                Sure, some web site could allow people to share what price they paid - but the vastly different insurance plans are such that this information is simply not going to usable by too many people.

                Equally even if a bunch of people had the same plan, the health service providers don't have pricing standardization.
                You keep missing my point. Perhaps I'm not being clear.

                I KNOW there's currently no common ground for comparison. I KNOW the health service providers don't have pricing standardization, and neither do the insurers when it comes to premiums and compensation to providers. I KNOW that insurers are opaque and want to stay that way.

                I'm saying we need to CHANGE THE SYSTEM BY FORCE OF LAW because the insurers are not acting in the best interests of the public. I don't care what the insurance companies want. Insurance companies are driving up costs and driving people into bankruptcy. I hate them with a fiery vengeance! I'm at the point where I want them abolished. Revoke their corporate charters and go to single payer. Countries much poorer than ours do better than we do because they don't have insurance middlemen driving up costs.

                Make our system more like Thailand's or Japan's. Establish set prices for procedures using Medicare pricing as the standard base price. Allow doctors, clinics and hospitals to charge whatever percentage they like above that base price. They can charge whatever they think their service is worth and whatever the public will bear. Let the consumer clearly see that Hospital A charges base price + 5% for a colonoscopy, while Hospital B charges base price + 30% for the same procedure. That's a free market.

                Then there's the expertise issue.

                If it is already difficult to tell one contractor offering from another for a relatively constrained area like home improvement/repair - how much harder is it for a layman to correctly describe all that was done medically on his/her behalf? To tell if one medication is equivalent, better, worse, or even completely unrelated to the other? To understand if this procedure or that procedure makes more sense to the condition in question?
                What is so complicated about being told by your doctor that you need a colonoscopy, a stent or a knee replacement, then comparison shopping for the best price in your area? You should also have clear disclosure about each facility's track record with the procedure in question. If one hospital charges more for a heart procedure but they have a much higher percentage of successful outcomes, you might consider the higher price justified. Or if your doctor says you need a certain medication, you shop around for the best price?

                The only way that has been shown to work is to have a provider which is not interested in profit and doesn't have payment issues as an always-there alternative. Or in other words, national health care.
                Not true. For example, there are Cash Payment MRI clinics that don't accept insurance. They will do an MRI for $300-$400 that would cost thousands if billed through insurance. They're able to offer low prices and full price transparency because they aren't having to deal with insurance billing.

                More and more doctors are dropping contracts with health insurers and switching to a concierge medicine business model. See here and here and here. Their relationship is strictly between them and their patients with no insurance middleman. They have transparent pricing, provide better care and their prices are much, much lower because they don't have all the overhead required for insurance billing.

                Break the monopoly insurance companies have over health care. There are many options better than the mess we have now: Concierge medicine, cash-only providers, even single-payer/nationalized medicine... I wouldn't even be considering that last option if the I of FIRE hadn't pushed me beyond the limit of my patience.

                Be kinder than necessary because everyone you meet is fighting some kind of battle.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Crowdfunding and some sunshine for: pricinghealthcare ?

                  Originally posted by shiny
                  You keep missing my point. Perhaps I'm not being clear.

                  I KNOW there's currently no common ground for comparison. I KNOW the health service providers don't have pricing standardization, and neither do the insurers when it comes to premiums and compensation to providers. I KNOW that insurers are opaque and want to stay that way.

                  I'm saying we need to CHANGE THE SYSTEM BY FORCE OF LAW because the insurers are not acting in the best interests of the public. I don't care what the insurance companies want. Insurance companies are driving up costs and driving people into bankruptcy. I hate them with a fiery vengeance! I'm at the point where I want them abolished. Revoke their corporate charters and go to single payer. Countries much poorer than ours do better than we do because they don't have insurance middlemen driving up costs.

                  Make our system more like Thailand's or Japan's. Establish set prices for procedures using Medicare pricing as the standard base price. Allow doctors, clinics and hospitals to charge whatever percentage they like above that base price. They can charge whatever they think their service is worth and whatever the public will bear. Let the consumer clearly see that Hospital A charges base price + 5% for a colonoscopy, while Hospital B charges base price + 30% for the same procedure. That's a free market.
                  I agree with your sentiment - but if we're going to force standardization, I'd personally prefer a national health care system rather than an enforced pricing regimen.

                  I'd also note that there is a 'pricing board' for Medicare - and it is run quite differently than Japan. Among other things, the politics of zero sum is at play there. You might not have seen this article:

                  http://www.itulip.com/forums/showthr...light=medicare

                  Originally posted by shiny
                  What is so complicated about being told by your doctor that you need a colonoscopy, a stent or a knee replacement, then comparison shopping for the best price in your area? You should also have clear disclosure about each facility's track record with the procedure in question. If one hospital charges more for a heart procedure but they have a much higher percentage of successful outcomes, you might consider the higher price justified. Or if your doctor says you need a certain medication, you shop around for the best price?
                  Because people's bodies aren't a pipe under a sink.

                  The stent is one option, but there are quite a number of others.

                  For heart procedures - there are literally dozens if not hundreds, ranging from a simple ablation to open heart quad bypass. Every one of these procedures has a gigantic number of variables ranging from the medications used (which are both a function of the procedure's need and the patient's status) to the number/quality of anesthesia/anesthesiologists, to the operating room (and equipment) etc etc.

                  For knee replacements - it isn't like we have only 1 type of knee replacement nor that all knee replacement parts are identical, or even that the work needed to diagnose/install the knee replacement is identical.

                  As for track records - who judges what? Would a hospital which takes in minimum payment Medicare patients really have the same success rates as the fanciest, most expensive oligarch hospital in Manhattan? As you can probably see from this - there would be a lot of resistance to 'track records' much as was seen with standardized school testing.

                  Originally posted by shiny
                  Not true. For example, there are Cash Payment MRI clinics that don't accept insurance. They will do an MRI for $300-$400 that would cost thousands if billed through insurance. They're able to offer low prices and full price transparency because they aren't having to deal with insurance billing.

                  More and more doctors are dropping contracts with health insurers and switching to a concierge medicine business model. See here and here and here. Their relationship is strictly between them and their patients with no insurance middleman. They have transparent pricing, provide better care and their prices are much, much lower because they don't have all the overhead required for insurance billing.

                  Break the monopoly insurance companies have over health care. There are many options better than the mess we have now: Concierge medicine, cash-only providers, even single-payer/nationalized medicine... I wouldn't even be considering that last option if the I of FIRE hadn't pushed me beyond the limit of my patience.
                  All quite true, but unfortunately all quite marginal.

                  The reality is that the vast majority of health care is obtained via health insurance, which in turn is primarily obtained via employment.

                  Having a price list isn't going to break up that dynamic.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Crowdfunding and some sunshine for: pricinghealthcare ?

                    The reality is that the vast majority of health care is obtained via health insurance, which in turn is primarily obtained via employment.
                    Which is driven entirely by TAX LAWS. Which is completely contrary to "free market", even though the single payer trumpeters keep telling us how badly this "free market" health care is working.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Crowdfunding and some sunshine for: pricinghealthcare ?

                      Originally posted by shiny! View Post
                      ....there are Cash Payment MRI clinics that don't accept insurance. They will do an MRI for $300-$400 that would cost thousands if billed through insurance. They're able to offer low prices and full price transparency because they aren't having to deal with insurance billing....
                      this is ABSOLUTELY TRUE and should be the first thing highlighted - i was quoted a co-pay - a GD CO-PAY!! - of 1500bux for a ct-scan ?? - and an 'abdominal-only' at that - with a 'list price' of 3grand/copay50% - ON TOP OF the 6grand i'm paying for 'insurance' ??? - when eye see ENTIRE BODY ct-scans being advertised in places where there's apparently more of a 'free-market' (hint: in the reddest of the red states ;) for these services - for 800bux?

                      i'd really love/appreciate hearing why that is the case....

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Crowdfunding and some sunshine for: pricinghealthcare ?

                        Originally posted by LorenS
                        Which is driven entirely by TAX LAWS. Which is completely contrary to "free market", even though the single payer trumpeters keep telling us how badly this "free market" health care is working.
                        Actually, I don't completely agree.

                        I do agree that the genesis of the present situation - i.e. that most health care is obtained via employer - is a result of tax law.

                        However, it is highly debatable if the tax 'benefits' of employer provided health care at this point outweigh the fiscal 'penalties'.

                        What we have is essentially a chicken/egg problem: if employers could offload the health care problem without being penalized in the labor competition market, they probably would. If employees could choose alternative means of health insurance without forgoing 'free money' from employer sponsored plans, or having to settle for significantly worse health insurance, they probably would.

                        Theoretically Obamacare should help with this - time will tell.

                        Unfortunately my own view is that the primary effect of Obamacare will be a race to the bottom: Obamacare now provides very clear tiers to which health insurance can serve down to.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Crowdfunding and some sunshine for: pricinghealthcare ?

                          Originally posted by lektrode View Post
                          this is ABSOLUTELY TRUE and should be the first thing highlighted - i was quoted a co-pay - a GD CO-PAY!! - of 1500bux for a ct-scan ?? - and an 'abdominal-only' at that - with a 'list price' of 3grand/copay50% - ON TOP OF the 6grand i'm paying for 'insurance' ??? - when eye see ENTIRE BODY ct-scans being advertised in places where there's apparently more of a 'free-market' (hint: in the reddest of the red states ;) for these services - for 800bux?

                          i'd really love/appreciate hearing why that is the case....
                          And if you go with the inexpensive CT scan you can't apply it towards your insurance decuctible. And the reason you're going the cheap route is because you can't afford your deductible after paying the obscenely expensive monthly premium.

                          I keep hearing politicians say how people like their insurance policies and don't want to lose them. Who are they talking to besides their Insurance company campaign contributors? I don't know anyone who is happy with their insurance (except federal employees and congressmen). Too many people are stuck in jobs they hate in order to keep the insurance they hate, because as much as they hate their insurance they can't afford to lose it. This, IMO, is the main reason why FIRE doesn't want to separate insurance from employment. It serves a function to keep people docile and obedient, just as home ownership does.

                          Be kinder than necessary because everyone you meet is fighting some kind of battle.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Crowdfunding and some sunshine for: pricinghealthcare ?

                            Originally posted by shiny! View Post
                            I keep hearing politicians say how people like their insurance policies and don't want to lose them. Who are they talking to besides their Insurance company campaign contributors? I don't know anyone who is happy with their insurance (except federal employees and congressmen).
                            uh huh - dont git me goin, ms shiny! ;)
                            guess its just mere innocent co-incidence that they EXEMPTED THEMSELVES, huh?
                            or i guess maybe it would've been 'too complicated' and unfair? to put themselves on the same 'program'

                            Too many people are stuck in jobs they hate in order to keep the insurance they hate, because as much as they hate their insurance they can't afford to lose it. This, IMO, is the main reason why FIRE doesn't want to separate insurance from employment. It serves a function to keep people docile and obedient, just as home ownership does.

                            yup and guess that's all 'merely another co-incidence' that the lamestreame media cheerleaders chose to ignore

                            just like they IGNORE all this....

                            again - they wonder why foxnews is number one...

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X