Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Culture Friday: Elysium

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Culture Friday: Elysium



    The Worst Is Yet to Come

    By MANOHLA DARGIS

    Not since Charlton Heston struggled to save humanity from itself have movies looked this grimly, resolutely fatalistic. The man who was Moses began fighting the fantasy good fight in 1968, battling damn dirty apes in “Planet of the Apes,” before going on to face zombie hordes in “Omega Man” and an overpopulated nightmare in “Soylent Green.” (Psst: It’s people!) Heston may be gone, but the zombie hordes have kept coming, along with other new and unusual annihilating threats, and now it’s back to the dystopian future with “Elysium,” a cautionary shocker from the director Neill Blomkamp about a Hobbesian war of all against all from which only Matt Damon can save us.

    Mr. Damon plays Max, an Everyman living, though often just struggling, in 2154 amid the devastation known as Earth. Mr. Blomkamp knows how to set the stage and, as cameras race over the wreckage like vengeful or fleeing angels, taking in the digitally rendered horrors and real locations, some introductory text explains the basics. Disease, poverty and overpopulation — and, from the churning dust, presumably ecological ruin — have transformed the planet into a global ghetto.




    While the multicultural many crawl through the terrestrial dirt, the privileged few live in the ultimate gated community, a wheel-shaped space habitat, Elysium, that brings to mind an orbital Mercedes-Benz logo. Up close, it looks like one of the costlier coastal swatches of Southern California.






    Mr. Blomkamp, who made a splash with his 2009 feature debut, “District 9,” has a talent for making the old and familiar seem excitingly new. As he has before, he again uses real locations to suggest the impending worst, with areas in Mexico City here standing in for 2154 Los Angeles. (Parts of Vancouver double for Elysium.) Pauline Kael once called Los Angeles the fantasy-brothel, “you can live any way you want (except the urban way),” but for years, the city has also served as a reliable nightmare, more roach motel than brothel: Sure, you can get in, but good luck getting out. That this tends to say more about how some filmmakers see the movie industry should go without saying.

    For his part, the 33-year-old Mr. Blomkamp hasn’t been around long enough to bite the hand feeding him. And while he has a talent for visualizing the worst (apparently a big-studio directorial prerequisite these days), he brings a light touch and jokes to the ugliest proceedings. Even Max’s ghetto doesn’t seem especially awful. He may live in a home that’s a dump by haute Hollywood standards, but it looks far better than the cardboard and corrugated-metal houses crowding the poorer regions of so many of the real world’s megalopolises. The mob of children who swarm him on his way to work greet him with giggles not desperation, while his friend, Julio (a sweet Diego Luna in fetching braids), offers camaraderie and some back story when he asks for Max’s help with a robbery.

    A reformed thief with tattoos riding up his neck, Max now labors in a factory that manufactures the robots that police the masses and, shades of “The Jetsons” and Philip K. Dick, serve the Elysium elite. That the robots appear to have it easier than the humans stuck on Earth is one of the bitter truths that Mr. Blomkamp deploys as he begins filling in the story. He’s better with some big-picture details: On Earth, folks speak English and Spanish (Max switches between both), while on Elysium, the well-heeled drop a little French in between exchanging pleasantries and exercising their privilege. The apotheosis of their Elysium entitlement, and a crucial emblem of the divide between the haves and the have-nots, are home-wellness machines that, by rescrambling atoms, eradicate disease almost instantaneously.

    The movie gets going after Max receives a lethal dose of radiation, sending him on a mission of self-preservation. “I don’t want to die,” he says, voicing the fear of extinction behind all dystopian fiction. His mission grows exponentially weightier when, in an effort to cure himself, he joins up with a smuggler, Spider (Wagner Moura, fantastic). A high-tech coyote, if one still using a notebook computer, Spider agrees to send Max to Elysium illegally on the condition that he steal information from the head, literally, of an industrialist (the dependably good William Fichtner in full slither mode). The would-be brain-jacking goes wrong, sending Max deeper into trouble, pushed one way by a love interest (Alice Braga) and pulled another by Elysium villains (Jodie Foster and Sharlto Copley).

    Putting the world in Mr. Damon’s hands is as smart as making him the star of a big special-effects fantasia. At once preternaturally boyish and middle aged (he’s 42), Mr. Damon has become the greatest utility player in movies: No one can better vault across rooftops and in and out of genres and make you care greatly if he falls. He’s so homespun that he could have sprung wholly formed from a corn silo (he shares James Stewart’s extraordinary likability if not his later-life, postwar neurotic edge). But it’s the ease and sincerity with which Mr. Damon conveys moral decency — so that it feels as if it originates from deep within rather than from, say, God or country — that helps make him a strikingly contemporary ideal of what used to be regularly called the American character.

    That character is crucial to making “Elysium” work as well as it does for the simple reason that Mr. Damon’s performance helps keep the movie from sinking under the weight of its artfully constructed horrors. Much as he did in “District 9,” a wobbly political allegory about crustaceanlike E.T.’s subjected to apartheid abuse in South Africa, Mr. Blomkamp builds on real catastrophes to create an admonitory tale. This is one of the axiomatic constructs of science fiction, which makes the familiar strange and the strange familiar, whether it’s the dark, rainy Los Angeles of Ridley Scott’s “Blade Runner” or a Europe that foreshadows that of World War II in H. G. Wells’s 1933 novel, “The Shape of Things to Come” (which three years later became the film “Things to Come”).

    “Elysium” owes something to “The Shape of Things to Come,” in which Wells, writing amid a worldwide depression, envisions a disastrously fallen Earth saved by “an intelligent minority” that abolishes warring sovereign nations in favor of a world government. However disquieting his technocratic remedy for what ailed his times, Wells meets the imaginative worst with a speculative resolution. In other words, he suggests an answer, something that has become scarce in the ravaged landscapes of many science-fiction movies. Mr. Blomkamp’s rendering of Elysium as a McMansion-studded suburb is amusing (it owes much to a space haven designed in 1975 by NASA and Stanford University), but its banality is further evidence of how difficult Utopian visions, even caricatures like this one, have become for filmmakers to imagine.

    Like many others working the industrial genre beat, Mr. Blomkamp turns out to be much better at blowing things up than putting the shattered pieces together, though this may also be a matter of box-office calculation. The beginning of “Elysium” comes on like gangbusters, and at first it’s fun to be swept up in a movie like this, riding shotgun with the swooping camera moves and feeling the dread creep in with each of the score’s brassy blares (harbingers of doom like those in “Inception”). As the weapons start firing and the blood begins running, it’s hard not to wonder, though, if it’s Mr. Blomkamp who couldn’t find a genuinely fresh exit strategy or whether, as this summer’s screen conflagrations suggest, it’s the big studios that have given up on Utopia.

    “Elysium” is rated R (Under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian). Apocalyptic violence.
    Elysium

    Opens on Friday.

    Written and directed by Neill Blomkamp; director of photography, Trent Opaloch; edited by Julian Clarke and Lee Smith; music by Ryan Amon; production design by Philip Ivey; visual effects supervisor, Peter Muyzers; costumes by April Ferry; produced by Bill Block, Mr. Blomkamp and Simon Kinberg; released by TriStar Pictures. Running time: 1 hour 42 minutes.
    WITH: Matt Damon (Max), Jodie Foster (Delacourt), Sharlto Copley (Kruger), Alice Braga (Frey), Diego Luna (Julio), Wagner Moura (Spider) and William Fichtner (John Carlyle).

  • #2
    Re: Culture Friday: Elysium

    i really enjoyed "district 9," with its not so subtle allusion to apartheid.

    now this movie shows that the growing-inequality meme has gone mainstream, moving from ows to hollywood.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Culture Friday: Elysium

      "Mr. Blomkamp turns out to be much better at blowing things up than putting the shattered pieces together"

      A perfect analogy to what socialism does to nations. See Detroit for example.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Culture Friday: Elysium

        Originally posted by vt
        A perfect analogy to what socialism does to nations. See Detroit for example.
        Are you saying socialism is responsible for destroying Detroit?

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Culture Friday: Elysium

          Thanks for posting this. I enjoyed "District 9" and it was far more engaging than Ms. Dargis believes it to be. I have an easy day of it today and will end up back in the theater to see this. Has to be 18 months or more since my last visit, what with Netflix and such. Just not much of a movie guy.

          Young Mr. Blomkamp is a talented storyteller. As I recall of "Distict 9", his clever use of sci-fi enabled him to tell a story his audience might not want to hear. I thought Blomkamp demonstrated a keen mastery of allegorical narrative for such a young filmmaker, as he redirected the audience's attention with tentacle-faced creatures and mile-wide space hulks hovering over Joburg before hitting them with the themes he wanted to communicate; racism, poverty, inequality, militarism, fascism, propaganda.


          And all this done with a PC and digital video on the cheap. He's a producer's dream.

          Maybe that sort of talent is lost on the East Village film critic set, but I can't recall the last time any one of them made a work of art that moved me to look.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Culture Friday: Elysium

            Originally posted by c1ue View Post
            Are you saying socialism is responsible for destroying Detroit?
            c1ue, you know that Obama is our first truly socialist president, right.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Culture Friday: Elysium

              Originally posted by don View Post
              c1ue, you know that Obama is our first truly socialist president, right.
              Are you serious? Obama isn't even remotely socialist.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Culture Friday: Elysium

                Not exactly, but the move for more government control of institutions leads to creeping socialism which is evident in many large cities. We see bloated bureaucracies with way too many employees and pension systems that are unsubstantial. One article had a quote from a city employee about to retire at 50 with pension and health care for life.

                I recognize the decline in industry has left many out of work and that government has provided jobs for some, but the tax base can no longer support the cost.
                Instead of pointing of the problems of failed cities we should study successful cities to see how they avoid decline and how their governments work effectively.

                Failed communities have elements of crony capitalism as well as crony socialism. We need to stop corruption on both sides of the political spectrum.

                As for socialism in America, see the articles below:

                http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/USAsocialist.htm

                http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/0...roved-America#

                Many of these 75 examples could be done far more efficiently and with lower cost through private sources.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Culture Friday: Elysium

                  Originally posted by vt
                  Not exactly, but the move for more government control of institutions leads to creeping socialism which is evident in many large cities. We see bloated bureaucracies with way too many employees and pension systems that are unsubstantial. One article had a quote from a city employee about to retire at 50 with pension and health care for life.
                  I understand where you're coming from - but I would point out that an overly generous and unrealistic pension scheme isn't socialism. Too many employees isn't exclusively a socialist issue either.

                  Originally posted by vt
                  Failed communities have elements of crony capitalism as well as crony socialism. We need to stop corruption on both sides of the political spectrum.
                  Fair enough. The issue, however, seems to be the crony aspect - not the economic system per se.

                  And if the problem is the crony aspect, I fail to see why private institutions will be any better. Cronyism exists everywhere.

                  Not very credible given that all of the mentions of Socialism refer to people and events in the World War I time frame. I don't think the political situation in the early 1900s is in any way relevant to what we have today, and certainly I am extremely unconvinced that the US is a socialist society, much less a socialist government.

                  I'm curious as to which of these examples you are referring to.

                  Social Security? Defense? Public Parks?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Culture Friday: Elysium

                    Originally posted by c1ue View Post
                    I understand where you're coming from - but I would point out that an overly generous and unrealistic pension scheme isn't socialism. Too many employees isn't exclusively a socialist issue either....
                    ...
                    and certainly I am extremely unconvinced that the US is a socialist society, much less a socialist government.

                    I'm curious as to which of these examples you are referring to.

                    Social Security? Defense? Public Parks?
                    me too - but he does have a good point and that it certainly would appear that we headed in that direction?

                    Originally posted by vt View Post
                    .....the decline in industry has left many out of work and that government has provided jobs for some, but the tax base can no longer support the cost.
                    Instead of pointing of the problems of failed cities we should study successful cities to see how they avoid decline and how their governments work effectively.
                    ...
                    there are 2 that come to (my) mind immediately (if only because i spend so much time in both); and for the purpose of this topic, i'll focus on just one facet of .gov functions that can make or break a metro area/state

                    1: an example of what works (for the benefit of The Public at large) and how it manages to do so in a (reasonably) cost-effective manner, in a place where the transportation system has been well developed and functions very well

                    2: a how-to of what NOT to do with Proponents POV
                    and a classic example of crony-class propaganda promoting it;
                    vs the Opponents POV - which keeps the discussion grounded in reality, in a place where the Dept of Trafficjams seems to exist only to extract as many federal dollars as it can, while accomplishing as little as possible.

                    in short, a purrrfect example of the diff tween 'blue states' and 'red states' and how the 2 operate.
                    Last edited by lektrode; August 10, 2013, 01:58 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Culture Friday: Elysium

                      i'm with c1ue in questioning the definition of socialism here. i think our country has become increasingly statist under both democratic and republican administrations, at the same time many of the organs of the state have been captured by private interests and bent to their own ends. meanwhile, other state organs have been paralyzed to allow private interests to take advantage of regulatory lacunae created by the inability of a paralyzed gov't to update its supervisory and enforcement mechanisms.

                      ps re socialism- see the image that i've adopted as a signature, below.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Culture Friday: Elysium

                        Which raises the point, is State Corporatism Socialism? Will Larry Summers be seen as a socialist heading the Fed? Does China's CP State Capitalism muddy the definition waters? Can socialism exist without a working class?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Culture Friday: Elysium

                          I think the problem here is a question of definition.

                          The traditional definition of an organization which is primarily interested in expanding its own scope isn't socialism - it is bureaucracy.

                          The traditional definition of a government which acts primarily on behalf of corporations is fascism.

                          The greatest trick the Devil ever made was to have everyone think he doesn't exist; the greatest trick of the fascist bureaucrats is to make everything think what's happening is socialism.

                          Originally posted by don
                          Which raises the point, is State Corporatism Socialism?
                          No, see above

                          Originally posted by don
                          Will Larry Summers be seen as a socialist heading the Fed?
                          Larry Summers is a bankster fascist seeking to head a large non-governmental bureaucracy.

                          Originally posted by don
                          Does China's CP State Capitalism muddy the definition waters? Can socialism exist without a working class?
                          Whatever you might criticise the CCP for - it isn't corporatism. In China, the corporations are clearly under the heel of the government, not the other way around. The CCP does exhibit many of the characteristics of bureaucracy, however, but it also still seems to operate under the charter of socialism - which is the government undertaking actions for the general betterment of the public.

                          The question right now is if the bureaucratic tendencies are overwhelming the socialist charter. That's what happened in Russia.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Culture Friday: Elysium

                            Originally posted by c1ue View Post
                            I think the problem here is a question of definition.

                            The traditional definition of an organization which is primarily interested in expanding its own scope isn't socialism - it is bureaucracy.

                            The traditional definition of a government which acts primarily on behalf of corporations is fascism.

                            The greatest trick the Devil ever made was to have everyone think he doesn't exist; the greatest trick of the fascist bureaucrats is to make everything think what's happening is socialism.



                            No, see above



                            Larry Summers is a bankster fascist seeking to head a large non-governmental bureaucracy.



                            Whatever you might criticise the CCP for - it isn't corporatism. In China, the corporations are clearly under the heel of the government, not the other way around. The CCP does exhibit many of the characteristics of bureaucracy, however, but it also still seems to operate under the charter of socialism - which is the government undertaking actions for the general betterment of the public.

                            The question right now is if the bureaucratic tendencies are overwhelming the socialist charter. That's what happened in Russia.
                            +1

                            Nicely done, proving once again c1ue doesn't stand for clueless.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Culture Friday: Elysium

                              Bono on Capitalism:

                              http://blog.independent.org/2013/08/...erty-than-aid/

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X