Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Scary Side of Synbio Glowing Plants

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Scary Side of Synbio Glowing Plants

    This sounds like fun. I want to engineer a cat that cuddles up to people (except for the ones we don't like), kills and eats the neighborhood dogs, and brings home deer for us to eat.


    The Scary Side of Synbio Glowing Plants


    . . .

    What could possibly go wrong? Well, I don't know much about the science of creating living lamps. But I do think it's important to think out the broader implications of synbio—as the novel technology is known—and ask questions about how its release from the lab into the world is regulated. Which is evidently pretty lightly—this consortium is casually promising to distribute glowing seeds to hundreds of people.

    I can't think of a better source for examining the promise and perils of synbio than this much-cited 2007 essay by the eminent physicist—and climate change skeptic—Freeman Dyson. In it, he laid out a rosy vision for what he called the "domestication of biotechnology." Here's Dyson:

    There will be do-it-yourself kits for gardeners who will use genetic engineering to breed new varieties of roses and orchids. Also kits for lovers of pigeons and parrots and lizards and snakes to breed new varieties of pets. Breeders of dogs and cats will have their kits too. Domesticated biotechnology, once it gets into the hands of housewives and children, will give us an explosion of diversity of new living creatures, rather than the monoculture crops that the big corporations prefer.


    . . .


    Justice is the cornerstone of the world

  • #2
    Re: The Scary Side of Synbio Glowing Plants

    How long before someone designs plants that grow drugs? Imagine a pea plant where the peas in the pod were full of cocaine or heroin. Why do synthetic chemistry to make methamphetamine when you can get a plant to do it for you? Many synthesizes start from plant derived ingredients already. Once you have the genes needed to do this they could probably be inserted into pretty much any plant you wanted.

    How would the police police this?

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: The Scary Side of Synbio Glowing Plants

      Originally posted by bungee View Post
      How long before someone designs plants that grow drugs? Imagine a pea plant where the peas in the pod were full of cocaine or heroin. Why do synthetic chemistry to make methamphetamine when you can get a plant to do it for you? Many synthesizes start from plant derived ingredients already. Once you have the genes needed to do this they could probably be inserted into pretty much any plant you wanted.

      How would the police police this?
      By watching all of the citizens through the X-boxes they have in every room of their house of course.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: The Scary Side of Synbio Glowing Plants

        Originally posted by cobben View Post
        This sounds like fun. I want to engineer a cat that cuddles up to people (except for the ones we don't like), kills and eats the neighborhood dogs, and brings home deer for us to eat.


        The Scary Side of Synbio Glowing Plants


        . . .

        What could possibly go wrong? Well, I don't know much about the science of creating living lamps. But I do think it's important to think out the broader implications of synbio—as the novel technology is known—and ask questions about how its release from the lab into the world is regulated. Which is evidently pretty lightly—this consortium is casually promising to distribute glowing seeds to hundreds of people.

        I can't think of a better source for examining the promise and perils of synbio than this much-cited 2007 essay by the eminent physicist—and climate change skeptic—Freeman Dyson. In it, he laid out a rosy vision for what he called the "domestication of biotechnology." Here's Dyson:

        There will be do-it-yourself kits for gardeners who will use genetic engineering to breed new varieties of roses and orchids. Also kits for lovers of pigeons and parrots and lizards and snakes to breed new varieties of pets. Breeders of dogs and cats will have their kits too. Domesticated biotechnology, once it gets into the hands of housewives and children, will give us an explosion of diversity of new living creatures, rather than the monoculture crops that the big corporations prefer.


        . . .


        once it gets into the hands of housewives and children

        If it was only left to the men of the house, then home bio engineering would be dandy.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: The Scary Side of Synbio Glowing Plants

          Surely the very best reason is to prevent the capability of being able to bio-engineer deadly viruses? I always remember the Australian scientists who had set out to find a disease to reduce the mouse population. They bio-engineered Mouse Pox, luckily in a lab that was secure as they created such a virulent disease, they lost every mouse in the lab, including the controls. It is simply a matter of time before someone that does not have the best interests of humanity in mind, finds out how to do similar things to any disease that can be used to reduce the human population.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: The Scary Side of Synbio Glowing Plants

            Originally posted by Chris Coles
            Surely the very best reason is to prevent the capability of being able to bio-engineer deadly viruses?
            Well, for one thing, it ain't that easy to engineer anything.

            Built a car recently from scratch? A computer?

            Bio-engineering is 2 or 3 orders of magnitude worse.

            Comment

            Working...
            X