This is probably shooting fish in a barrel, but I saw a particularly egregious example this past weekend.
I was in DC for some work, and was exposed to the Washington Post. I've never respected this publication primarily due to its editor, Fred Hiatt, but browsed through it since I was there (and it was free).
After seeing this Counterpunch article - everything became clear...
http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/06/...shington-post/
What did I see? Included in that edition of the Washington Post was a 'special advertising supplement' which was 4 pages of the China Daily. For those who don't know, the China Daily is essentially the Taiwan newspaper - it even says Republic of China (vs. the mainland's People's Republic of China).
I was in DC for some work, and was exposed to the Washington Post. I've never respected this publication primarily due to its editor, Fred Hiatt, but browsed through it since I was there (and it was free).
After seeing this Counterpunch article - everything became clear...
http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/06/...shington-post/
Fred Hiatt wrote a column for The Washington Post titled “Will Xi Jinping’s ‘Chinese dream’ include the rule of law?” Irony is officially dead.
Hiatt, for those who don’t know, is the editorial page editor at the Post, and someone who lives and breathes for war. Not in the sense that he has ever volunteered to go fight in one, of course. That’s for Other People to do. Hiatt prefers to fight the good fight from his comfortable D.C. office. There’s much more money and prestige in doing it that way.
Hiatt, for those who don’t know, is the editorial page editor at the Post, and someone who lives and breathes for war. Not in the sense that he has ever volunteered to go fight in one, of course. That’s for Other People to do. Hiatt prefers to fight the good fight from his comfortable D.C. office. There’s much more money and prestige in doing it that way.
Comment