Michael Hudson
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Hudson: Too Big To Jail
Collapse
X
-
Re: Hudson: Too Big To Jail
Interesting.
While much of what he says will be familiar to iTulipers, I enjoyed his brief tangent differentiating the banking models of mercantile England and socialist Germany (touching on China's as well).
Thanks for posting!
-
Re: Hudson: Too Big To Jail
Me too. Often Hudson elaborates with some new insightful tidbits.Originally posted by astonas View PostInteresting.
While much of what he says will be familiar to iTulipers, I enjoyed his brief tangent differentiating the banking models of mercantile England and socialist Germany (touching on China's as well).
Thanks for posting!
Comment
-
Re: Hudson: Too Big To Jail
Hudson's solution is for government to take over the Big Banks.
That won't work.
Why? Because there is no incentive for politicians to gut the banks. Their banker golfing buddies give them campaign contributions so they can get re-elected. It's naive to expect politicians to bite the hand that feeds them . . . as we can see from the dearth of bankster prosecutions.
The People -- us -- are the ones that have a stake in getting rid of the big banks, not the politicians. So I suggest that the People do it themselves.
There's a bank on almost every corner . . . plenty of competition.
If the People simply stopped using the big banks, and started using the little banks, they could Starve the Beasts. In other words, Boycott the Big Banks, as I have been advocating in my iTulip signature for the last 5 years.
How difficult is it to open up a new bank account, and write a check transferring funds? Not very.
It's an idea whose time has come.
It needs is to go viral.
People must understand that the big banks are the villains . . . and that shouldn't be so hard to accomplish in the age of the Internet.Last edited by raja; April 01, 2013, 08:45 AM.raja
Boycott Big Banks • Vote Out Incumbents
Comment
-
Re: Hudson: Too Big To Jail
Private individuals should certainly move their money to community banks and credit unions (I did years ago), but businesses that exist in more than one location usually need all their banking done at the same bank. Small community banks can't offer that convenience.
I tried to convince my company to switch to a local bank or credit union, but we couldn't find one that could service our eight offices in four different cities. I suspect that's a big reason why businesses, even small businesses like ours, stay with the big banks.
Be kinder than necessary because everyone you meet is fighting some kind of battle.
Comment
-
Re: Hudson: Too Big To Jail
Businesses yes, individuals no. I kept my independent (been around a century) bank in Cali when I moved to Florida. Everything is working beautifully.Originally posted by shiny! View PostPrivate individuals should certainly move their money to community banks and credit unions (I did years ago), but businesses that exist in more than one location usually need all their banking done at the same bank. Small community banks can't offer that convenience.
I tried to convince my company to switch to a local bank or credit union, but we couldn't find one that could service our eight offices in four different cities. I suspect that's a big reason why businesses, even small businesses like ours, stay with the big banks.
Comment
-
Re: Hudson: Too Big To Jail
The big question I have: how much do the big banks even need individual depositors anymore?Originally posted by raja View PostHudson's solution is for government to take over the Big Banks.
That won't work.
Why? Because there is no incentive for politicians to gut the banks. Their banker golfing buddies give them campaign contributions so they can get re-elected. It's naive to expect politicians to bite the hand that feeds them . . . as we can see from the dearth of bankster prosecutions.
The People -- us -- are the ones that have a stake in getting rid of the big banks, not the politicians. So I suggest that the People do it themselves.
There's a bank on almost every corner . . . plenty of competition.
If the People simply stopped using the big banks, and started using the little banks, they could Starve the Beasts. In other words, Boycott the Big Banks, as I have been advocating in my iTulip signature for the last 5 years.
How difficult is it to open up a new bank account, and write a check transferring funds? Not very.
It's an idea whose time has come.
It needs is to go viral.
People must understand that the big banks are the villains . . . and that shouldn't be so hard to accomplish in the age of the Internet.
Comment
-
-
I'm in on the boycott.
I closed almost all my accounts at big banks one year ago. I cannot refinance at this time, so BofA still has my mortgage.Originally posted by raja View PostIn other words, Boycott the Big Banks, as I have been advocating in my iTulip signature for the last 5 years.
.
Occupy has expressed intereset in BBB, but most occupy participants do not have enough money saved to make a difference.
Comment
-
Re: Hudson: Too Big To Jail
Last I saw for BoA was about a year ago. If I recall correctly, $1.1 trillion was sitting in deposits, $550 billion of which were retail deposits. I think JP Morgan's about 2/3 that size. Even if Americans aren't saving much, there are 300+ million of us. If there's an average of 5,000 in the bank for individuals and families (average, not median), that fits the bill about right. I think there's about $7 trillion totally sitting in deposits. The ratio's probably 50/50, individual/business. At least twice that is floating around as retail credit. Again, I'm working off memory. So take it with a grain of salt. But I think if you poke around, you'll find these numbers are in the ballpark.Originally posted by RebbePete View PostThe big question I have: how much do the big banks even need individual depositors anymore?
It matters. Even now.
Comment
Comment